Oct 31, 2018

Sharon El-Amin Shines in 30 October 2018 Parent-Led School Board Forum That Could Serve as a Foundation for Mass Movement for Change in the Minneapolis Public Schools

Very possibly a mass movement for change in the Minneapolis Public Schools began on 30 October 2018. 

 
And fortuitously, a candidate once again distinguished herself among four contestants vying for one of two At-Large seats up for election on 6 November 2018, igniting a voluble response from those in attendance and demonstrating that she has the vision to be one of the leaders of this potentially transformative popular activism.
 
The event at which the mass movement likely began was the Parent-Led School Board Candidate Forum, held at the University of Minnesota Urban Research and Outreach Engagement Center in North Minneapolis (2100 Plymouth Avenue, across from the Minneapolis Urban League), and sponsored by the following groups:  KWST Behavioral Development Group, Little Earth of United Tribes, STANDUP, Centro Tyrone Guzman, Latino Youth Development Collaborative, UPLIFT-MN, the Northside Achievement Zone (NAZ), and Voices for Effective Change.
 
This was an event wholly dissimilar to the first event held at South High School and, especially, the second and third events held respectively at Our Saviour’s Lutheran Church (15 October, sponsored by the Isaiah group and others) and at Franklin Middle School (22 October, sponsored by Pollen Midwest in conjunction with the Graves Foundation);  these latter two events were highly controlled affairs that afforded no opportunity for audience participation.
 
How different was the event of 30 October, moderation of which was ably led by a representative of Latino Youth Development Collaborative and by Keary Saffold of KWST Behavioral Development Group.  These two very avidly encouraged participation by members of the audience, who expressed themselves with emoji signs of frowns and smiles, applause, groans, cheers, and questions written down on notecards and posed to the candidates.
 
Salient questions focused on academic achievement levels, school staff insensitivity, and suspension policies for Somali, Latino, Native, and African American students.  Candidates were in their typical modes in addressing these issues:  Rebecca Gagnon (the only incumbent in the race) referred to programs already in place that need more staffing, monetary resources, or emphatic acceleration;  Josh Pauly as a Minneapolis Federation of Teachers (MFT) endorsee and former teacher at Sanford Middle School also emphasized programs already established that need to be more fully implemented, such as training for cultural competency;  Kimberly Caprini (the other MFT endorsee) stressed her experience during a decade of involvement as parent and education activist, now energetically charged to bring the advocacy that she exhibited at site-based councils to policy implementation and creation at the level of the school board.
 
But the night belonged as candidate to Sharon El-Amin. 
 
Clearly, this is a leader who has emotional resonance with many different constituencies in North Minneapolis, the Cedar-Riverside area, and an expanding base throughout the city.  The Somali community was out in force at this gathering, clearly listening intently to each statement from El-Amin.   This was true, too, for the sizable Native, Latino, and African American contingents in the audience.
 
El-Amin answers questions honestly, clearly, and from the heart.  She speaks as a parent of two children who attended and graduated from MPS schools, and another who is currently a student at North High School.   When asked those salient questions concerning academic achievement levels, school staff sensitivity, and suspension policies for Somali, Latino, Native, and African American students, her responses came as one whose children have experienced the indignities of responses from school officials, as one who currently leads the North Polar Parent organization, and who does not shy away from exposing the inadequacy of the academic program, school climate, and behavioral policies at North High specifically and the district in general. 
 
And very significantly, the majority of the audience of 75-100 attendees demonstrated that they also chafe at these deficiencies in the Minneapolis Public Schools and are positioned to make themselves heard.
 
The organizers of the forum on 30 October can be very proud.  They got the word out very effectively and motivated diverse constituencies to attend this event.  They gave those constituencies an opportunity to make themselves heard.  In doing these things they did what great leaders of the overlooked and dispossessed always do, animating response from a seemingly inert population of morally abused people, converting the latent energy of resentment into overt demand for change.
 
The 30 October 2018 Parent-Led School Board Forum could serve as a foundation for a mass movement for change in the Minneapolis Public Schools, shaking current district officials and board members to their own rickety foundations.
 
Sharon El-Amin’s emergence as a leader of wisdom and emotional resonance gives great credence to the possibility of popular agitation for fundamental change in the programs and processes of the Minneapolis Public Schools.
 
And inasmuch as the locally centralized school district must be the focus of the next great advance for social justice in the United States, this forum and this leader may very well have launched a movement of national significance.

Oct 29, 2018

Continuation of Multi-Article Series >>>>> What is Leslie Lewandowski Accomplishing for that $100,000-Plus Salary, Given the Academic Performance of the Contract Alternative Schools for Years Ending in 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018?



The current article is entered on this blog in the spirit of those covering academic performance of conventional schools and others in the Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) that are under the  supervision of associate superintendents Ron Wagner, Carla Steinbach, and Brian Zambreno.  The foci of this article are the contract alternative schools that fall under the supervision of Leslie Lewandowski.

 

Contract alternative schools are those independent alternative schools, either private or public, that contract to provide students with an alternative to conventional MPS schools.

 

Whenever a student is consigned to an alternative school, there is tacit admission by MPS officials that the conventional schools have failed miserably to provide a K-12 education of excellence to students who typically face challenges of psyche, family economy, or familial functionality.  Alternative schools take public education dollars for shuffling students on through to graduation for claiming a diploma that means nothing in terms of knowledge and skill sets acquired and leads nowhere except perpetuation of cyclical poverty and lives of desperation.

 

The academic results of these wretched institutions tell the tale and raise grave questions as to what Leslie Lewandowski does for that salary that well exceeds $100,000 per year.

Consider:


Leslie Lewandowski, Multi-Year Academic Performance for Alternative Schools Supervised

 

Percentage of Students Proficient at Grade Level as Indicated by Performance on the Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments (MCAs)

 

500 West Broadway

 

    2014    2015      2016      2017     2018

 

Math          -----       -----      -----      -----       -----

 

Reading     -----       -----      -----      -----       -----

 

Science      -----      -----      15%      -----       -----

 

American Indian OIC

 

    2014    2015      2016      2017    2018

 

Math          -----       -----      -----      -----       -----

 

Reading      14%    -----      -----       14%       -----

 

Science      -----       -----      19%      -----       -----

 

Center School

 

    2014    2015      2016      2017    2018

 

Math         -----      -----        -----        -----       -----

 

Reading     22%     -----         8%         8%       11%

 

Science      -----      -----        -----        -----       -----

 

Loring Nicollet
 

    2014    2015      2016      2017    2018

 

Math            9%      17%     -----      -----      -----

 

Reading     50%     -----        -----       60%    -----

 

Science      -----      -----       30%         7%      13%

 

Menlo Park

 

    2014    2015      2016      2017       2018

 

Math            6%     -----      -----         -----        -----     

 

Reading     18%     -----       -----        15%       -----

 

Science       -----      -----      -----        -----        -----    

 

Merc


    2014    2015      2016      2017      2018

   

Math      -----      -----      -----       -----         -----    


 

Reading     10%     -----      -----       -----         -----             


Science      -----      -----      -----       -----         -----    

 

Online Learning

 

    2014    2015      2016      2017       2018

 

Math         -----      -----      -----       -----         -----    

 

Reading     71%     -----     -----        -----        -----        

 

Science      -----      -----      -----      -----       -----    

 

PYC Arts and Technology School

 

    2014    2015      2016      2017       2018

 

Math             2%     -----          3%      -----        -----

 

Reading        8%       8%         3%      -----        -----

 

Science         -----      2%         4%      -----          3%

 

Tatanka Academy

 

    2014    2015      2016      2017       2018

 

Math          17%     -----      -----      -----        -----

 

Reading     17%     -----      -----      -----        -----

 

Science       ----      -----      -----      -----        -----

 

Urban League Academy

 

    2014    2015      2016      2017       2018

 

Math          86%      86%       85%      86%        81%

 

Reading     -----       -----       5%         -----         -----       

 

Science      -----       -----       -----        -----         -----

 

VOA (Volunteers of America) High School

 

    2014    2015      2016      2017       2018

 

Math            3%      3%       -----       -----        -----

 

Reading     -----     -----       11%      14%        22%

                   

Science      -----     -----       20%        9%        17%

                   







Oct 26, 2018

Article #6 in a Series >>>>> Academic Performance of Schools Supervised by Associate Superintendent Brian Zambreno, Academic Years Ending in 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018


This article is the sixth in a series focused on multi-year academic performance of all schools in the Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS), categorized according to supervision by the pertinent associate superintendent.  This article presents the academic performance of students at schools supervised by Associate Superintendent Brian Zambreno.

 

Remember that MPS associate superintendents such as Zambreno serve as mentors to site principals and along with those leaders at the school level have responsibility for academic results at the schools under their supervision.  Over the last half decade the number of associate superintendents has gone from eight, to six, to four, and now to three.  During the 2017-2018 academic year the associate superintendents included Laura Cavender, Lucilla Davila, Carla Steinbach, and Ron Wagner;  for the current academic year of 2018-2019, Cavender has been reassigned as principal of Bryn Mawr K-5 elementary school and Davis has been reassigned as principal of Folwell K-8 elementary school.   Steinbach and Wagner remain as associate superintendents, the former with responsibility for all middle schools and high schools, the latter with responsibility for approximately half of all MPS K-5 and K-8 elementary schools;  Brian Zambreno came to the district from Richfield and has responsibility for the remainder of the K-5 and K-8 schools. 

 

The following tabular presentation gives multi-year academic results for the nineteen K-5 and K-8 schools under the supervision of Brian Zambreno. 

 

Brian Zambreno is new to then Minneapolis Public Schools in this academic year 2018-2019.  He bears no responsibility for past academic records, those for academic years ending in 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018;   but he will be responsible for implementation of programmatic initiatives and, along with building principals whom he mentors, for academic proficiency levels attained by students at schools under his supervision for the current  2018-2019 academic year.

 

Consider:

 

Associate Superintendent Brian Zambreno, Multi-Year Academic Performance for Schools Supervised

 

Percentage of Students Proficient at Grade Level as Indicated by Performance on the Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments (MCAs)

 

Armatage Montessori

 

    2014    2015      2016      2017     2018

 

Math          65%      74%       74%      77%        75%

 

Reading     68%      78%       71%      76%        76%

 

Science       64%     70%     66%        72%        70%

 

Bancroft  Academy

 

    2014    2015      2016      2017    2018

 

Math           35%      34%     34%      36%       40%           

 

Reading      21%      20%       27%     29%       35%

 

Science       24%      19%     21%       19%       32%

 

Barton Open

 

    2014    2015      2016      2017    2018

 

Math          66%      61%       62%      56%        51%

 

Reading     74%      68%       63%      64%        58%

 

Science      50%      42%     46%       41%        48%

 

Cityview

 

    2014    2015      2016      2017    2018

 

Math          -----      17%         8%        9%        5%

 

Reading     22%      27%       18%       22%        22%

 

Science      20%      25%      25%        10%        20%

 

Dowling Urban Environmental

 

    2014    2015      2016      2017       2018

 

Math          70%      65%       68%       65%        62%

 

Reading     67%      64%       65%       59%        62%

 

Science       72%      65%      67%         66%       67%

 

Folwell Arts Magnet

 

    2014    2015      2016      2017      2018

 

Math          32%      29%       29%       28%        20%

 

Reading     25%      25%       26%       25%        26%

 

Science      18%      21%       32%       20%        18%

 

Hmong International Academy

 

    2014    2015      2016      2017       2018

 

Math           23%     23%       23%       18%        15%

 

Reading      16%     15%       18%       18%        18%

 

Science        12%       9%       20%       18%          6%

 

Howe

 

    2014    2015      2016      2017       2018

 

Math          59%      61%       64%       67%        74%

 

Reading     50%      62%       66%       71%        75%

 

Science       43%      48%     61%         59%       67%

 

Lake Harriet (Lower)

 

    2014    2015      2016      2017       2018

 

Math          82%      88%       93%      93%        95%

 

Reading     72%      67%       81%      85%        90%

 

Science      -----      -----      -----      -----        -----

 

Lake Harriet (Upper)

 

    2014    2015      2016      2017       2018

 

Math          86%      86%       85%      86%         81%

 

Reading     84%      86%       85%      80%         82%

 

Science      81%      84%     81%       76%         76%

 

Marcy Open

 

    2014    2015      2016      2017       2018

 

Math          57%      50%       51%      47%         45%

 

Reading     47%      49%       51%      51%         48%

 

Science      44%      46%     48%        40%        39%

 

Pillsbury Community School

 

    2014    2015      2016      2017       2018

 

Math          55%      58%       45%      52%         41%

 

Reading     37%      33%       32%      38%         32%

 

Science       37%      30%      23%       31%         21%

 

 

Seward Montessori

 

    2014    2015      2016      2017       2018

 

Math          49%      46%       44%       37%        37%

 

Reading     54%      51%       48%       41%        48%

 

Science       53%     42%       43%        40%        33%

 

Sheridan

 

    2014    2015      2016      2017       2018

 

Math          31%      35%       24%       21%        23%

 

Reading     17%      18%       19%      16%         22%

 

Science        4%      19%     16%       13%           7%

 

Webster

 

    2014    2015      2016      2017       2018

 

Math          -----      -----      -----       42%         46%

 

Reading     -----      -----      -----       33%         38%

 

Science      -----      -----      -----       -----         -----
 

Whittier International

 

    2014    2015      2016      2017       2018

 

Math          51%      43%       38%      31%         32%

 

Reading     43%      40%       38%      33%         36%

 

Science       26%      40%    37%        19%          34%

 

Windom Spanish Dual Immersion

                    

    2014    2015      2016      2017       2018

 

Math          58%      61%       67%      57%         57%

 

Reading      45%      53%       59%      53%         53%

 

Science        54%     43%      65%       47%          50%