Feb 28, 2019

Article #2 in a Series >>>>> An Examination of the Ed Graff Record in Understanding Why He Does Not Deserve a Second Contract as Superintendent of the Minneapolis Public Schools >>>>> A Comparison of Student Academic Proficiency Levels During Graff’s Tenures in Anchorage (Alaska) and Minneapolis


Article #2 in a Series >>>>>  An Examination of the Ed Graff Record in Understanding Why He Does Not Deserve a Second Contract as Superintendent of the Minneapolis Public Schools  >>>>>  A Comparison of Student Academic Proficiency Levels During Graff’s Tenures in Anchorage (Alaska) and Minneapolis

This is the second article in my series examining the record of Ed Graff, conveying to readers why he does not deserve a second contract as superintendent of the Minneapolis Public Schools.

Other than that opening subjective statement, though, I am in these first articles in the series offering my readers strictly objective information from Ed Graff’s record as to credentials;  tenure in several capacities for the Anchorage, Alaska, schools;  and performance in the course of the two years and seven months that Graff has served as superintendent for the Minneapolis Public Schools.

I challenge my readers to consider why I would examine the record provided and recommend strongly against reappointment.  I surmise that for many readers this exercise may prove difficult, inasmuch as to those who do not understand the nature of credentials acquisition for professional positioning in locally centralized school systems, there may well be items in the Graff record that look appealing but are in fact distinct negatives.  Readers who have truly sought to go deeply with me over the course of the nearly 1,000 articles on this blog will most likely draw the same conclusions as have I.



Whichever sort of reader you are, please now continue your examination of the facts pertinent to the record of Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) Superintendent Ed Graff;  I now present a brief summary of student academic proficiency levels for a salient year (2014-2015) in Graff’s three-year term in Anchorage, Alaska;  I then give a summary of student academic proficiency levels for the last five academic years in the Minneapolis Public Schools, academic years 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 of which represent the first two years of three (current academic year 2018-2019 is the third) covering the term of Graff’s first contract.

Brief Summary of Achievement Levels during Ed Graff’s


Tenure as Superintendent in Anchorage, Alaska


 

Results for Academic Year 2014-2015

 

All Grade Levels

 

Language Arts

 

Does Not          Partially         Meets              Exceeds

Meet                 Meets             Standard         Standard

Standard          Standard

 

Student

Categories

 

African                  35.1%              42.1%               20.5%             2.3%

American

 

White/                 13.3%               33.7%               44.3%             8.5%

Caucasian

 

Hispanic               28.3%               42.3%               26.9%             2.5%

 

 

Alaska                   42.4%              37.5%                18.1%                 1.9%

Native

American/

American

Indian

 

All Grade Levels

 

Mathematics

 

Does Not      Partially      Meets          Exceeds

Meet              Meets         Standard     Standard

Standard       Standard

 

Student

Categories

 

African                  29.5%         51.3.%         16.9%          2.3%

American

 

White/                 12.9%          39.7%          36.5%         10.9%

Caucasian

 

Hispanic               23.4%          50.9%          21.8%           3.9%

 

 

Alaska                   29.0%          50.3%         18.2%           2.5%

Native

American/

American

Indian

 

MPS Academic Proficiency Rates for 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, & 2018

 

Math                     2014       2015       2016      2017      2018

 

African                  23%       19%         19%      16%       17%

American

 

American             23%        19%           19%       16%        17%

Indian

 

Hispanic               31%         32%          31%       29%        26%

 

Asian                     48%         50%          50%       44%        46%

 

White                   77%         78%          78%       77%        77%

 

Free/                     26%         26%          25%       24%        22%

Reduced

 

All                          44%         44%           44%     42%        42%

 

Reading               2014       2015       2016      2017      2018

 

African                  22%       21%         21%      21%       21%

American

 

American             21%        20%           21%       22%        23%

Indian

 

Hispanic               23%         25%          26%       26%        27%

 

Asian                     41%         40%          45%       38%        44%

 

White                   78%         77%          77%       78%        80%

 

Free/                     23%         23%          23%       25%        25%

Reduced

 

All                          42%         42%           43%     43%        45%

 

Science               2014       2015       2016      2017      2018



African                 11%       15%         13%      11%       10%

American

 

American             14%        16%           13%       16%        13%

Indian

 

Hispanic               17%         18%          21%       19%        17%

 

Asian                     31%         35%          42%       31%        34%

 

White                   71%         75%          71%       70%        71%

 

Free/                     14%         15%          17%       16%        15%

Reduced

 

All                          33%         36%           35%     34%        34%







Article #1 in a Series >>>>> An Examination of the Ed Graff Record in Understanding Why He Does Not Deserve a Second Contract as Superintendent of the Minneapolis Public Schools


In this article I begin a series in which I examine the record of Ed Graff, conveying to readers why he does not deserve a second contract as superintendent of the Minneapolis Public Schools.

Other than that opening subjective statement, though, I will for the first articles in the series offer my readers strictly objective information from Ed Graff’s record as to credentials;  tenure in several capacities for the Anchorage, Alaska, schools;  and performance in the course of the two years and seven months that Graff has served as superintendent for the Minneapolis Public Schools.

I challenge my readers to consider why I would examine the record provided and recommend strongly against reappointment.  I surmise that for many readers this exercise may prove difficult, inasmuch as to those who do not understand the nature of credentials acquisition for professional positioning in locally centralized school systems, there may well be items in the Graff record that look appealing but are in fact distinct negatives.  Readers who have truly sought to go deeply with me over the course of the nearly 1,000 articles on this blog will most likely draw the same conclusions as have I.

Whichever sort of reader you are, please now begin your examination of the facts pertinent to the record of Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) Superintendent Ed Graff;  I begin with Graff’s academic preparation and the biography that he provided when he sought the MPS superintendent position, still posted on the MPS website:

Academic and Professional Credentials

For MPS Superintendent Ed Graff

 

Ed Graff               (MPS Superintendent)

 

Degrees Earned                Institution at Which

     Degree Was Earned

 

M. A., Education              University of Southern Mississippi

Administration                

 

This M.A. in Education Administration from University of Southern Mississippi is

an online degree.

 

B. A., Elementary             University of Alaska, Anchorage

Education                                           

 

Professional Biographical Sketch Provided by

MPS Superintendent Ed Graff Himself

 

Ed Graff is the Superintendent of Minneapolis Public Schools. 

 

Previously he served as the superintendent of the Anchorage School District, one of the nation's 100 largest school districts. Mr. Graff is dedicated to doing what is best for all students collectively while still meeting the needs of each individual.

 

Throughout Mr. Graff’s 25 years as an educator, the best interest of students has remained his top priority in order to ensure each has the opportunity for a well-rounded, enriching school experience along with the support needed to reach his or her potential.

 

Mr. Graff began his teaching career in 1991 at an elementary school in Anchorage, Alaska. He went on to become a school principal, executive director of Elementary Education, chief academic officer and was appointed superintendent of ASD in 2013.

 

He has led implementation of the Anchorage School District’s comprehensive strategic plan, expanded districtwide differentiated learning opportunities, increased preschool and literacy efforts, facilitated collaboration with more than 600 business partners and provided proven supervision and accountability for student instruction and business management.

 

Mr. Graff believes commitment and focused efforts will ensure the district is supporting students first, maintaining a focus in the classroom and working hard to create high expectations for everyone.

 

Originally from Minnesota, Mr. Graff holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Elementary Education from the University of Alaska Anchorage, and a Master's Degree in Education Administration from University of Southern Mississippi. He has post-masters coursework in curriculum, educational leadership and instruction.

 

Mr. Graff has served on several boards and professional organizations. In 2016, he was presented the Exemplary Social and Emotional Leadership Award from the Collaborative for Academic, Social and Emotional Learning. The award, demonstrating Mr. Graff’s leadership and vision for Social and Emotional Learning, had only been given twice before.

 

He is married to Michelle Prince, an elementary school principal. They have one son.

Feb 27, 2019

As Promised >>>>> Model Answers to Exam Covering American Prehistory and History through 1829 (based on reading of pertinent pages of American History: Micro-Fundamentals of an Excellent Liberal Arts Education)


Because the quality of education at the Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) is so wretched, I teach my students in the New Salem Educational Initiative most all of what they know in the major subject areas.  I am now in the process of bringing two books to completion, one (Understanding the Minneapolis Public Schools:  Current Condition, Future Prospect) that exposes with exhaustive factual detail the multiple deficiencies of MPS, the other (Fundamentals of an Excellent Liberal Arts Education) that imparts to my students the knowledge-intensive education that they should have but do not come close to receiving in MPS schools.

 

I have now actually generated three versions of (Fundamentals of an Excellent Liberal Arts Education) for my students, depending on the time for knowledge acquisition that applies to given students.  For example, in its fullest presentation, the American History chapter runs 65 single-spaced pages.  There is an intermediate length (30 single-spaced pages) presentation, and there is a micro-version that runs eleven (11) single-spaced pages for those students who for various reasons need to acquire as quickly as possible the essential facts and themes of American History.

 

A few days back, I entered this chapter on the blog.  I then presented an exam covering American History through 1829, inviting my readers to test their own knowledge of the history of this period in America and the early decades of the United States.

 

Having generated an exam featuring my own answers to serve as a model for my students in understanding the strengths and weaknesses of their own responses, I now present these answers to my readers. 

 

Those who have not yet taken the exam may want to scroll on down to the exam (sans answers).

 

Otherwise, please consider carefully these model answers to American History:  Micro-Fundamentals of an Excellent Liberal Arts Education  >>>>>  Exam Covering American Prehistory and History through 1829.

 

American History:  Micro-Fundamentals of an Excellent Liberal Arts Education

 

Exam Covering American Prehistory and History through 1829

 

Gary Marvin Davison, Ph. D.                           

Director, New Salem Educational Initiative

 

I.  Identification     (2.5 points each)

 

1.  BCE

 

This abbreviation stands for “Before the Common Era” and is chronologically equivalent to the term, BC, in designating the years conventionally associated with the centuries of history before the birth of Jesus.  The term, BCE, has gained greater usage in recent decades as a response to those non-Christian scholars who thought that for practical reasons the time scheme should be maintained, but that the Christian bias should be eliminated.

 

2.  CE

 

This abbreviation stands for the “Common Era” and is chronologically equivalent to the term. AD, in designating the years conventionally associated with the centuries of history after the birth of Jesus.  The term, CE, has gained greater usage in recent decades as a response to those non-Christian scholars who thought that for practical reasons the time scheme should be maintained, but that the Christian bias should be eliminated (thus congruent with the logic applicable to the use of the term, BCE, above).

 

3.  Bering Strait

 

This is the body of water between the Asian landmass and Alaska.  Archeological and geological evidence suggests that at approximately 15,000 years ago, those peoples who would become Native Americans crossed the land bridge exposed by contracting waters of the Ice Age, trekking from Asiatic Russia into Alaska and thence proceeding to expand over North America (including Central America) and South America.

 

4.  Christopher Columbus

 

Columbus was a native Italian (Genoa) who secured financial backing from Spanish monarchs Isabella and Ferdinand and sailed on four voyages across the Atlantic Ocean between 1492 and 1502.  Among the many who had come to perceive the known world as spherical, Columbus sought an all-water route to the East Indies (today’s Indonesia) so as to avoid the middlepersons who dominated the overland trade between those spice-rich islands and the Mediterranean.  Columbus sailed four centuries after the Viking Leif Ericsson had landed in Newfoundland (and explored the St. Lawrence River region) but had much greater impact.  Though he never realized his geographical error, he had in fact introduced Europeans to two continents, leading the way for the cruel, adventurous, and prosperous colonial exploits of Spain, Portugal, France, and Great Britain. 

 

5.  Divide and conquer

(generally, and then particularly with regard to organization of slavery on

British-American colonial and early-United States plantations)

 

This term applies to those who seek to rule and abet that desire by playing off the people to be dominated against one another.  On the British-American plantations of the South, plantation owners used this technique by giving house slaves and slave drivers (the latter generally African Americans working under the direction of overseers) superior status and less physically demanding work than field slaves.  Used by many conquerors in the course of history, this would later be saliently true in the post-Reconstruction South, whereby the powerful white elite would play off poor whites and generally even poorer black sharecroppers against each other, thus minimizing the chance of their forming a political coalition.  

 

6.  Louisiana Purchase

 

This was a procured territory, stretching westward from the Mississippi River to the Northeast Pacific coast, by agreement between France and the United States in 1803.  Since by this time, the American Revolution (1775-1781/1783) had already been fought and the British ousted (to be confirmed in the War of 1812), the Louisiana Purchase (quickly followed by the William and Clark Expedition with the assistance of Sacajawea during 1804-1806) essentially led to the geographical definition of the United States that we now know, engendering westward expansion of various peoples of European origins and the encroachment onto land expanses long occupied by Native American peoples.

 

7.  George Washington

 

Washington was a Virginia plantation and slave owner who would lead the army of Americans in rebellion against the British in the American Revolution (1775-1781/1783).  Washington was able to make do with a generally inexperienced, ragtag soldiery to prevail, with some German and very significant French assistance, against the British.  Washington would go on to serve as the first President of the United States, serving two terms (1789-1797), bringing generally Federalist sensibilities to the exercise of government with policies that brought credibility to the United States as a fledgling nation.   

 

8.  Loyalists (Tories, Redcoats)

 

These terms refer to those who remained loyal to the British during the American Revolution.  Far from a unanimous proposition, the Revolution was backed especially by those (such as John Adams and Samuel Adams of Boston) with mercantile interests most hurt by the taxation policies of the British Parliament and the obstreperous stances of George III.  The Loyalists included a substantial contingent of backwoods and southern colonialists.  Also, although African Americans were themselves divided as to their loyalties and energies, those African Americans doubtful as to any advantages that could accrue to themselves in waging the American Revolution elected to fight on the British side as de facto Loyalists, hoping that by doing so the colonial power would reverse policies pertinent to the slave trade and the slave system.

 

9.  judicial review

 

This is the term that gained usage in the aftermath of the Marbury v Madison (1803) decision, whereby the Supreme Court led by Chief Justice John Marshall asserted the right of that highest judicial body in the United States to make the final determination as to the constitutionality of statutory law passed by the United States Congress and by state legislatures, and as to the actions of individuals.  Although the Constitution generally establishes checks and balances and a balance of power among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the United States government, this power of judicial review establishes determinative power of the Supreme Court (at the apex of the judicial branch) over other governmental bodies with respect to interpretation of the intent of the Constitution as the “law of the land.” 

 

10.  Monroe Doctrine (1823)

 

Vice-President John Quincy Adams took the lead in behalf of President James Monroe (term, 1817-1825) in proclaiming United States political and military preeminence in North and South America.   By this time, the Battle of Quebec (1763), the American Revolution (1775-1781/1783), and the War of 1812, and various revolutions in Mexico and South America had in the main respectively ousted the French, British, Spaniards, and Portuguese from occupation of territory in the Americas.  The Monroe Doctrine established the principle that Europeans and others should not interfere in events in the Americas, asserting an aggressive role for the United States, furthered by the Roosevelt Corollary in the early 20th century and leading to multiple intrusions of the United States into the affairs of Latin American nations during the course of the 20th and 21st centuries.

.

II.  Short Answer     (15 points each)

 

1.  Give an account of the arrival of those people who became the indigenous peoples of the Americas (Native Americans), their geographical expansion over the two continents, their individual distinctiveness, and common features in their way of life.  

 

At approximately 15,000 years ago, people who had roamed the northern Asian expanses trekked across the Bering Strait land bridge exposed during the last Ice Age and entered what we now know as Alaska.  From Alaska, these people took divergent paths across areas now identified as Canada, the United States, Mexico, Central America, and South America.  These became the progenitors of Native American peoples classified into at least 35 different tribes or nations, each with distinctive responses to local circumstances of geography, topography, and climate.  Some were warlike, some were peaceful;  in either case, they viewed land as sacred, vital in an animate and inanimate world overseen by deities identified with the sun, moon, rain, mountains, rivers, and creatures of Nature.  The notion of finely demarcated land according to borders in the European fashion was not common among the Native American peoples, leading to one of many misunderstandings and conflicts with those who came to America many centuries after those who made that first arrival from Asia.     

 

2.  For the European powers of Spain, Portugal, Great Britain, and France, give accounts of the general pattern of their settlement in the Americas:  Explain where each power located colonies, what economic return occurred as a result of colonialization, and the duration of colonialization for each of the powers.

 

Columbus sailed for Spain, looking for an all-water route to Asia and the source of spices in the East Indies (in what is now Indonesia).  He made four voyages (1492-1502) without finding what he sought or realizing what he had found, but he led the way for others from Spain, such as Hernando  Cortez (1519) and Francisco Pizarro (1532), who respectively brutalized and sickened the Aztecs (Mexico) and Incas (Peru) in route to Spanish dominance over Mexico, Central America, and most of South America.  Silver from South American mines and plantations throughout Spanish-held territory enriched the crown of Spain and for a time (until the defeat of the Spanish Armada by the British in 1588) made Spain the dominant colonial power.  Portugal was also a world power, exploring routes to Asia and establishing a major colony in Brazil.  France and Great Britain contended for influence in North America, with the British eventually emerging as the victor in the battles of Quebec (Canada) and Plassey (India), both in 1763.  Great Britain, though still a global power and maintaining a governing presence in Canada into the 19th century, itself lost to its formerly governed peoples of the 13 Atlantic colonies in the American Revolution (1775-1781/1783) and the War of 1812.  By 1821, the Louisiana Purchase (1803) and various Latin American revolutions had induced the exit of Great Britain, France, Spain, and Portugal from most all territory in the Western Hemisphere, excepting locations in the Caribbean islands.  The economic advantages that accrued to the Europeans in the form of control over natural resources, slaves, agricultural produce, and nascent industry, now became sources of power and contention for the governments of the United States, Mexico, and the nations of Central and South America.

 

3.  Give a brief account of the American Revolution, including reasons for occurrence, diverse patterns of participation and sentiment among the colonists, general pattern of the fighting, important associated documents or declarations, and outcome.

 

In the late 18th century, the British Parliament (legislative body in a government led at the executive level by King George III) passed numerous laws affecting the 13 colonies.  Mercantile interests in Boston and other areas of the Northeast bridled especially at taxation policies.  Many colonists (Loyalists, Tories, Redcoats) remained loyal to the British, but in 1775 rising tensions led to the initial skirmishes at Concord and Lexington (Massachusetts), and Thomas Jefferson acted upon the decrees of the Continental Congress by penning the Declaration of Independence (issued on 4 July 1776).  With some assistance from Germans and significant help from the French, the colonial army led by George Washington prevailed, with the final battle coming at Yorktown in 1781.  Benjamin Franklin and others negotiated the Treaty of Paris (1783) with the British, and the new nation of the United States of America gained worldwide recognition.  African Americans fought variously for the American or Loyalist side, vainly seeking to advance interests that they correctly calculated were not likely to be recognized by either side:  The brutal system of slavery would endure beyond a half-century in the life of the new nation.

 

4.  Give a careful distinction between the Articles of Confederation (1781) and the United States Constitution (1789).

 

The Articles of Confederation (1781) represented the first attempt on the part of former colonial and now national leaders to generate a constitutional document for governing the United States of America.  But the resulting government was extraordinarily weak at the national level, with little power to raise revenue or even to command unity on military matters.  Thus, leaders gathered in Philadelphia for a Constitutional Convention to produce a new document of national governance.  The result was the Constitution of the United States of America (implemented, 1789) approved with the necessary majority by all of the states but Rhode Island.  The Constitution sought balance and compromise, between large states and small, and between government at the national and at the state and local levels.  The power of the central government, soon established in Washington, D. C.,  shared power with the states and localities but now was given significant powers pertinent to taxation, commerce, trade, and the military.    

 

5.  Explain the different stances of the Democratic-Republicans and the Federalists, the two parties that dominated electoral politics in the United States during the first three decades in the history of the nation. 

 

George Washington had eschewed and warned against party affiliation, but by the second presidential administration of John Adams (1797-1801), two contending political forces had emerged.  Adams and Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton were Federalists who first in the Federalist Papers had made the case for approving the United States Constitution and then had advocated for a very strong central government.  The Federalist political constituency was especially the business and urban interests of the Northeast and mid-Atlantic coast.  Thomas Jefferson (third United States president, 1801-1809), by contrast, although an advocate for the United States Constitution and enhanced central power, had a vision of the United States as an agrarian nation wherein individuals and states would maintain very firm rights.  John Madison (prime author of the United States Constitution and fourth United States president [1809-1817] had been an author of the Federalist Papers but by the time of his presidency had aligned himself with Jefferson and his Democratic-Republicans.  James Monroe (fifth president, term 1817-1825) presided in a time so dominated by the Democratic-Republican position that general agreement on political matters resulted in the “Era of Good Feelings.”  During the presidency of Andrew Jackson (seventh president, term 1829-1837) a new party came into being as the Democrats, which dominated over a party known as the Whigs (the Federalists had faded from the scene), a circumstance that prevailed until the establishment of the moderate anti-slavery party, the Republicans (party of Abraham Lincoln) in 1858.