Rochelle Cox, Associate Superintendent
of Special Education and Health Services, leads the Special Education program
of the Minneapolis Schools.
Office contact information is as
follows:
MPS Special Education Department,
Davis Center, 1250 West Broadway,
Minneapolis MN
55411
Phone: 612-668-5444
Phone: 612-668-5444
Fax:
612-668-5446
Office Manager: Cheryl Blood
612-668-5438
The Special Education Department
at the Minneapolis Public Schools offers four categories of services that meet
severity of need in order from least severe to most severe: Setting I, Setting II, Setting III, and
Setting IV. Setting I and II services
are offered at all mainstream MPS schools.
Additionally, the department offers four key programs at separate sites for
students at higher level need or special circumstances: 1) River Bend, for
Setting IV for grades K-8 students;
2) Harrison for Setting IV grades 9-12 students; 3)
Stadium View for students currently at Hennepin County Juvenile
Detention Center or Hennepin County Adult Detention Center; 4)
Transition Plus, for students ages 18-21. But the department also offers an early
childhood program and provides services at the sites of numerous government and
private local organizations. A complete
list is provided in the long document, full of information and indicating the
care that must be taken to meet legal mandates, that I have included in at the
end of this chapter.
Please read below the following information
concerning Special Education services at the Minneapolis Public Schools, as
presented on the district website, including the above-mentioned important
document.
…………………………………………………………………….
Minneapolis
Public Schools offers a wide-range of Special Education programs and services.
To
receive special education services, a student must first be evaluated and meet
state criteria. Once qualified, an Individual Education Plan (IEP) is developed
for the student. Programs and services are provided to students and their
families beginning at birth through age 21 or completion of a secondary
education program. Special education is also available for students who live in
Minneapolis that attend nonpublic schools.
Mission Statement
The special education department is relentlessly focused on
students receiving individualized services and equitable instruction in their
least restrictive environment. We are committed to educational evaluations and
services that are not predicted by a student’s race.
Staff Name and Title Contact Information Brief Description of Staff Additional
Information
Responsibilities relating
to child study procedures
and method of providing
special education services
Rochelle Cox, Davis Center Associate
Superintendent Also directly
supervises
Associate 612-668-5438 Specialized Services, 504, School Psychology
Superintendent and
Tuition Billing Manager,
School Mental Health,
Stadium View. River Bend, Transition Plus,
MPS Metro Programs, Harrison, ECSE
Martha Amundsen, Davis Center Program
Director for Also
supervises
Program 612-668-5404 Schools assigned to DHH, B/VI,
Director Associate
Special
Ed./ELL,
Superintendents Newcomer
Shawn Harris-Berry Evaluation,
and
LaShawn Ray, Work-Based
Harrison
and Learning,
Transition
Plus Speech-
Language
Manager,
Itinerant
Teacher
Virginia Nyhus Davis Center Program
Director for Also
directly
Program Director 612-668-5462 Schools
Assigned to supervises
Associate
Superintendent Professional
Ron
Wagner Development
and
Intervention
Support,
Technology,
Non-Public
Spec. Ed.,
SEA
Support,
Homebound/Home-
Based
Services
Sara Stack Davis Center Program Director for Also directly
Program Director 612-668-0914 Schools
Assigned to supervises
ACT&
Associate
Superintendent Assistive
Technology,
Brian
Zambreno, DAPE,
OT/PT,
River
Bend, and ECSE Communications,
Social
Work Services
Manager,
504,
Pl Services, and
Inclusive Practices
Virginia Buechel Mesun Davis Center Manager of Special Also works on
Assistant Direct 612-668-0482 Education General Counsel’s
General Counsel and Monitoring
& Office
assignments
Supervises Special
Compliance,
CoFast, &
Education Manager Tuition
billing
Development
Catherine Daines Davis Center Manager of District Also
is lead contact
Social Work 612-668-5436 School Social Workers for Mental Health
Services Manager Resources
available in
the district
Matthew Lau Davis
Center Manager of Also leads the
Manager Psychological 612-668-5443 District
School Crisis Recovery
Team
Services and MPS Crisis Psychologists
Recovery Lead
Jill Rentmeester Disher Davis Center Manager of
Speech/Language 612-668-5433 District Speech
Services Manager Language
Clinicians
Karen Bryce Davis
Center Manager of
Occupational/ 612-668-5414 District
Physical Therapy Occupational
and
Services Manager Physical
Therapists
Mark Sander Davis
Center Coordinates
Co-Located
School Mental 612-668-5489 Mental Health Services
Health Services
Amber Spaniel Davis
Center Director of School Also is
Health Services 612-668-5489 Health Care Staff the
Director District
504
Manager
Kristin Geiger Wilder Center Supervises MPS Early
Childhood
ECSE
Administrator 612-668-5104 Special Education Programs
Director
Jason Backes Wilder Center Supervises MPS
ECSE
Administrator 612-668-4101 Transition Plus Programs
Director
Nathan Hampton Harrison Site
Administrator for
ECSE
Administrator 612-668-2686 Harrison Center
Director
Clint Whisler W.
Harry Davis Site
Administrator for
ECSE
Administrator 612-668-2884 River Bend Education Center
Director and
Other Programs Located at
W. Harry Davis
Gary Speese Wilder
Center Site
Administrator for MPS
MPS Metro
Programs 612-668-4781 Metro SJ, MPSA Metro C,
Principal Hospital
Agencies and
Challenge Academy
Rhonda Larkin Stadium
View/ Site Administrator
for
Stadium View Juvenile
Detention Stadium View Campus A
Principal 612-348-7740 and Campus B
Jennifer
Schneider Davis Center Lead
for MPS Extended Year (ESY)
District Program 612-668-0819 Program
Facilitator
Section 504 of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 is an anti-discrimination statute that is
designed to provide equal access to education programs, services, and
activities for students with medical or mental health impairment. It requires that the needs of students with
disabilities be met to the same degree as the needs of students without disabilities.
The following
gives the content of is an important document that guides the Special Education
Department of the Minneapolis Public Schools in meeting the requirements of
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
Total
Special Education System (TSES), Minneapolis Public Schools
This document
serves as the Total Special Education System Plan (TSES) for the Minneapolis
Public Schools (MPS) in accordance with Minnesota Rule pt. 3525.1100. This TSES is in addition to the assurance for
compliance with the federal requirements pertaining to districts’ special
education responsibilities found in United States Code, title 20, chapter 33,
sections 1400 et seq. and Code of Federal Regulations, title 34, part 300. That document is a companion to the
Application fo0r Special Education Funds---
Statement of Assurances (ED-01350-29).
The Executive
Director of the Minneapolis Public Schools Special Education Department is
responsible for program development, coordination, evaluation, in-service
training, and general special education supervision and administration. The current Executive Director, Rochelle Cox,
may be reached at
612-668-5438.
I. Child Study Procedures
The district’s
identification system is developed according to the requirement of
nondiscrimination as MPS does not discriminate in education on the basis of race,
color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, status eith
regard to public assistance, sexual orientation, or disability.
A. Identification
MPS has developed
a system designed to identify students with disabilities beginning at birth,
students with disabilities attending public and nonpublic schools, and students
with disabilities who are of school age and are not attending any school.
MPS’s plan for
receiving referrals from parents, physicians, private and public programs, and
health and human services agencies is attached as MPS TSES Appendix A.
[Note >>>>> Readers may go to the Special
Education portal at the Minneapolis Public Schools website to view the appendix of reference.]
1) Infant and
toddler intervention services birth through two years of age---
Infant
and toddler intervention services birth through two years of age under United
States Code, title 20, chapter 33, section 1431 et seq., and Code of Federal
Requirements, title 34, part 303, are available to MPS children from birth
through two years of age who meet the outlined criteria.
The
team determines that a child from birth through the sage of two years is
eligible for toddler intervention services if
A. the child meets the criteria of one of the
disability categories in United States code, title 20, chapter 33, sections
1400, et seq., as defined under Minnesota Rules; or
B. the child meets one of the criteria for
developmental delay in sub-item (1) or the criteria in sub-item (2);
Page 2, July 2018
(1)
the child has a diagnosed physical or mental condition or disorder that has a
high probability of resulting in a developmental delay regardless of whether
the child has a demonstrated need or delay;
or
(2)
The child is experiencing a developmental delay that is demonstrated by a score
of 1.5 stndard deviations or more below the mean, as measured by the
appropriate diagnostic measures and procedures, in one or more of the following
areas:
(a)
cognitive development;
(b)
physical development, including vision and hearing;
(c) communication development;
(d)
social development; and
(e)
adaptive development.
2) Early childhood services age three through
six years of age---
The
team shall determine that a child from age of three years through age of six
years
is
eligible for special education when
A.
the child meets the criteria of one of the categorical disabilities in United
States code, title 20, chapter 33, sections 1400, et seq., as defined under
Minnesota Rules; or
B. the child meets one of the criteria for
developmental delay in sub-item (1) or the criteria in sub-item (2);
(1)
the child
(a)
has a diagnosed physical or mental condition or disorder that has a high
probability of resulting in a developmental delay;
or
(b)
has a delay in each of two or more areas of cognitive development; physical
development, including vision and hearing;
communication development; social
and emotional development; and adaptive
development, that is verified by evaluation using one or more technically
adequate, normed referenced instruments.
The instruments must be individually administered by appropriate,y
trained professionals and the scores must be at least 1.5 standard deviation
points below the mean in eac h area.
(2) The chilid’s need for special education is
supported by
(a)
at least one documented, systematic observation of a child’s routine setting by
an appropriate professional or, if observation of the daily routine setting is
not possible, the laternative setting must be justified;
(b) a developmental history; and
(c) at least one other evaluation procedure in
each area of identified delay thagt is conducted on a different day than the
medical or norm-referenced evaluation;
which may include criterion-referenced instruments, language samples, or
curriculum-based measures.
Page 3, July 2018
3) Minneapolis Problem-Solving Model
The
Minneapolis Problem-Solving Model (PSM) is a tiered, response-to-intervention
model through which at-risk students are provided interventions, assessed, and,
if identified as eligible for and in need of special education services, given
a non-categorical designation: Student
Needing Alternative Programming (SNAP).
)Under more traditional models, these students would be eligible for
special educqtional services under the labels of Specific Learning Disability
or Developmental Cognitive Disability (Mild-Moderate). The PSM was developed almost 20 years ago in
order to a) improved pre-referral interventions and assessments for students
who may have disabilities; b) reduce the emphasis on IQ scores and potential
bias in evaluation; and c) minimize the
stigma of special education labels.
The
first steps in the PSM are universal screening of students for academic and
behavioral needs, followed by Tier 2 interventions for children who fall below
set benchmarks. After interventions are
provided and data collected for approximately 6 to 8 weeks, children who not
show improvement receive more intensive Tier 3 interventions. If there is still no improvement, a special
education assessment is planned and, once written parental consent is in place,
begun.
The
elements of special education assessment in this model are aligned to the
criteria
>>>>> Academic achievement is assessed through
performance on norm-referenced and criterion-referenced assessments, response
to intervention or progress monitoring data, and review of student work;
>>>>> Intellectual abililty is considered, based
on review of the student’s response to pre-referral and ongoing instructional
interventions, classroom observations, and direct interaction with the student
using norm-referenced instrument(s) and/or individual non-standardied
procedures that address problem-solving skills, learning rate, and ability to
generalize new learning with grade-level materials.
>>>>> Adaptive skills are assessed, using formal
or informal instruments.
Students
are eligible for special education under the designation SNAP if they meet the
following criteria:
>>>>> inadequate rate of progress in response to
general education interventions;
>>>>> severe underachievement in combination with
broad average abllity OR significantly
below average
ability and adaptive skills;
>>>>> a deficit in one of the basic psychological
processes underlying learning, and
>>>>> rule out of cultural, linguistic,
educational, and similar factors.
Evaluation
1)
Infant and toddler intervention services
birth through two years of age---
The
evaluation used to determine whether a child is eligible for infant and toddler
intervention services must be conducted within the timelines established in
Code of Federal Regulations, title 34,
part 303. It must be based on informed
clinical opinion and must be multidisciplinary in nature, involving two of more
disciplines or professions; and must be
conducted by personnel trained to utilize appropriate methods and procedures.
The evaluation must include
Page 4--- July 2018
a)
a review of the child’s current records
related to health status and medical history;
b)
an evaluation of the child’s levels of
cognitive, physical, communication, social/emotional, and adaptive
developmental functioning;
c) an assessment of the unique needs of the
child in terms of the developmental areas in item b;
and
d)
at least one documented, systematic
observation in the child’s daily routine
setting
by an appropriate professional or, if observation in the child’s daily routine
setting is not possible, the alternative setting must be justified.
For
infants and toddlers birth through two years of age, any screening, the initial
evaluation and initial assessments of the child or family, and the initial IFSP
meeting must be completed within 45 calendar days from the date MPS receives
the referral of the child. The 45-day timeline
does not apply if 1) the child or parent is unavailable to complete the
screening, the initial evaluation, the initial assessments
of
the child and family, or the initial IFSP meeting due to exceptional family
circumstances documented in the child’s early intervention records; or 2) the parent has not provided consent for
the
screening, intial evaluation, or the initial assessment of the child despite
documented, repeated attempts by MPS to obtain parental permission. In the
latter cases, the screening, initial evaluation, initial assessments of the
child and family and the initial IFSP meeting should be completed as soon as
possible after the documented exceptional family circumstances no longer exist
or parental consent to the screening, initial evaluation, and initial
assessment of the child is obtained and MPS should develop an interim IFSP, to
the extent appropriate, while the evaluation proceeds.
2) Special education services age three through
21 years of age---
MPS
conducts a comprehensive individual initial evaluation before the initial
provision of special education and related services to a student. The initial evaluation consists of procedures
to determine 1) whether a child has a disability that adversely affects the
child’s educational performance as defined in Minnesota Statute 125A.o2, and 2)
because of that disability needs special
education
an related services. The evaluation also
determines the educational needs of the student. To conduct an initial evaluation to determine
of the child qualifies for special education an related services, MPS will
obtain written informed consent from the child’s parewnt or guardian before the
evaluation is conducted. Parental
consent for evaluation will not be construed as consent for placement for
receipt of special education and related services, The district will not override the written
refusal of a parent to consent to an initial evaluation or reevaluation.
There
are limited exceptions to this process where with parental consent a student
may receive services through an interim IEP prior to the completion of an
initial evaluation. The exceptions are
described in Appendix A to 34 C.F.R. Part 300, O & A, Nos. 14 & 17
(1999).
MPS
will conduct evaluations and reevaluations according to the following
procedures:
Page 5, July 2018
A. Notice will be given to the parents of the
student, according to Code of Federal Regulations, title 34, sections 300.500
to 300.505, which describes any evaluation procedures the district proposes to
conduct.
B. In conducting the evaluation MPS will
(1)
use a variety of evaluation tools and strategies to gather relevant functional
and developmental information, including information provided by the parent,
that are designed to assist in determining whether a child is a student with a
disability and the content o the students’ individualized education program,
including information related to enabling the student to be involved in and
progress in the general curriculum, or for preschool activities;
(2)
not use any single procedure as the sole criterion for determining whether a
child is a student with a disability or determining an appropriate education
program for the student; and
(3) use technically sound instruments that are
designed to assess the relative contribution of cognitive and behavioral
factors, in addition to physical or developmental factors.
C. MPS assures that
(1)
tests and other evaluation materials used to evaluate a child under this part
are selected and administered so as not to be discriminatory on a racial or
cultural basis, and are provided and administered in the student’s native
language or other mode of communication, unless it is clearly not feasible to
do so.
(2) materials and procedures used to evaluate a
child with limited English proficiency are selected and administered to ensure
that they measure the extent to which the child has a disability and needs
special education and related services, rather than measure the child’s English
language ability.
(3) any standardized tests that are given to the
child have been validated for the specific purpose for which they are used, are
administered by trained and knowledgeable personnel, and are admistered in
accordance with any instructions provided vby the producer of such tests.
(4) the child is evaluated in all areas of
suspected disability, including, if appropriate, health, vision, hearing,
social and emotional status, general intelligence, academic performance,
communicative status, and motor abilities;
(5) evaluation tools and strategies that provide
relevant information that directly assists persons in determining the
educational needs of the pupil are provided;
(6) if an evaluation is ot conducted under
standard conditions, a description of the extent to which it varied from
standard conditions is included in the evaluation report;
(7)
test and other evaluation materials include those tailored to evaluate specific
areas of educational need and not merely those that are designed to provide a
single general intelligence quotient;
(8) tests are selected and administered as best
to ensure that if a test is administered to a child with impaired sensory,
manual, or speaking skills, the test results accurately reflect he child’s
aaptitude or achievement level at whatever other factors the test purports to
measure, rather than reflecting the child’s impaired sensory, manual, or
speaking skills, unless these skills are the factors tht the test purports to
measure; and
(9) in evaluating ech student with a disability,
the evaluation is sufficiently comprehensive to identify all of the student’s
special education and related service needs, whether or not commonly linked to
the disability category in which the student has been classified.
D. Upon completion of the administration of test
and other evaluation procedures, MPS will determine whether the child is a
student with a disability as defined in Minnesota statues, section 125A.02,
using a team of qualified professionals and the parent of a student, and a copy
of the evaluation report and the documentation of determination of eligibility
will be provided to the parent.
E. In making a determination of eligibility
under item D, a child shall not be
determined to be a student with a disability if the determinant factor for such
determination is lack of instruction in reading or math or limited English
proficiency, and the child does not otherwisae meet eligibility criteria under
Minnesota Rule parts 3525.1325 to 3525.1351.
F. As part of an initial evaluation, if
appropriate, and as part of any reevaluation, or reinstatement of services
under part 3535.3100, the IEP team and iother qualified professionals, as
appropriate will
(1)
review existing evaluation data nb hbe student, including evaluations and
information provided by the parents of the students, current classroom-bases
assessments and observations, and teacher
and related services providers
observations; and
(2)
on the basis of the review, and input from the student’s parents, identify what
additional data, if any, are needed to determine whether the student has a
particular category of disability, as described in Minnesota Statues, section
125 A.02, or, in the case of a reevaluation of a student, whether the student
continues to have such a disability, the present levels of performance and
educational needs of the student, whether the student needs special education and
related services, and whether any additions or modifications to the special
education and related services are needed to enable the student to meet the
measurable annual goals set out in the individualized education program of ghe
student to participate, as appropriate, as appropriate, in the general
curriculum.
G. The district shall administer such tests and
other evaluation materials as may be needed to produce the data identified by
the IEP team under item F, sub-item (2).
H. The district will obtain informed parental
consent, prior to conducting any reevaluation of a student, except that such
informed consent need not be obtained if the district can demonstrate that it
had taken reasonable measures to obtain such consent and the student’s parent
failed to respond.
I.
If the IEP team and other qualified professionals, as appropriate, determine
that no additional data are needed to determine whether the student continues
to be a student with a disability, the district will notify the student’s parents
of that determination and the reasons for it,
and the right of the parents to request an evaluation to determine
whether the student continues to be a student with a disability, and the
district will not be required to conduct an evaluation unless requested to by
the student’s parents.
J.
MPS will evaluate a student before determining that ther student no longer
continues to need special education and related services and totally exiting
the student from special education.
K. Procedures for determining the eligibility
and placement.
In
interpreting the evaluation data for the purpose of determining if a child is a
student with a disability under Minnesota Rules and the educational needs of
the child, the school district will
Page 2, July 2018
(1)
draw upon information from a variety of sources, including aptitude and
achievement tests, parent input, teacher recommendations, physical condition,
social or cultural background, and adpativ e behavior; and
(2)
ensure that the information obtained from all of the sources is documented and
carefully considered.
I.
An evaluation report must be completed and delivered to the student’s parents
within the specified
evaluation
timeline. At a minimum, ther evaluation
report must include
(1) a summary of all evaluation results;
(2) the student’s present levels of performance
and educational needs that derive from the disability;
(3) whether he child needs special education and
related services or, in the case of a reevaluation, whether the student
continues to need special education and related services and documentation of
the basis for the determination; and
(4) whether any additions or modifications to the
special education and related services are needed to enable the student to meet
the measurable annual goals set out in he student’s IEP and to participate, as
appropriate, in the general curriculum.
II. Method of Providing Special Education
Services to Students eligible for Special Education and Relatged Services
If
based on an evaluation it is determines that a child with a disability who
needs special education and related services, or a reevaluation shows that the
student continues to need special education and related ser4vices, amn
individual education plan will be developed for the student to address those
identified needs.
MPS
provides a full continuum of educational service alternatives. All students with disabilities eligible for
special education services are provided the special instruction and services
that are appropriate to meet their identified educational needs. Set out below are descriptions od MPS’s
(A)
methods of providing special education and related services in MPS for identified
students, (B) available sites at which the services may be provided, and C)
special education and related services available.
A
student’s current level of performance, special education and related needs,
and special education goals and objectives are identified in a student’s
individual education plan. Appropriate
special education and related services to meet these special education needs,
goals, and objectives are determined on an individual basis. Program alternatives are comprised of the
type of services provided, the setting in which services occur, and the amount
of time and frequency in which the services are delivered. A student may receive special education and
related services in more than one program based on the student’s Individual
Education Plan (IEP) )pages 3 and 21) or Individual Family Services Plan (IFSP)
(ages birth to through age 2).
(A)
Methods of providing special education and related services in MPS for the identified
secial education students:
(1)
Early childhood services delivered in the home, in a center-based program, or
at a MPs community early childhood site
Page 8, July 2018
(2)
Instruction by general education teachers unb a general education classroom
with modifications, accommodations, supplemental services, and indire3ct
services by special education staff
(3)
Pull out direc instruction services in a small group special education resource
classroom
(4)
One on one instruction
(5)
Co-teaching instruction by general education and special education teachers
(6)
Services in small structured special education classrooms with high
staff-to-student ratios accommodations, supplemental services, and indire3ct
services by special education staff
(7)
Homebound and home-based instructional services
(8)
Instruction and other services in a highly structured environment in a separate
special education site
(9)
Transition services provided at a MPS high school or in a separate special
education site, including community-based vocational training programs and
work-based training programs
(10)
Instruction and other services at MPS locations needing special education
services who attend non-public Schools located in the city of Minneapolis,
including home-school studentsx
B. Alternative sites available in MPS at which
special education and related services may occur:
(1)
Each MPS mainstream school site has setting I and II special education services
available
(2)
Citywide setting III special education programs are available in many MPS
schools (Autism, DCD, CLASS/Lifeskills, SPEN/SPAN, PHD) with DHH classrooms
locaed in Sullivan Community School, 3100 E. 28th Street,
Minneapolis MN 55406
(3)
Special Education Setting IV services for students in grades K-8 are available
at River Bend Educational Center, 1510 glenwood Avenue, Minneapolis MN
55405
(4)
Special Educaton Setting IV services for students in grades 9-12 are available
at Harison Educational Center, 1510 glenwood Avenue, Minneapolis MN
55405
(5)
On-site education services, including special education services, provided by
MPS are available in the Cith of Minneapolis at the following care and
treatment facilities:
St.
Joseph’s home for children (Catholic Charities of St. Paul and Minneapolis)/
MPS Metro SJ (Day Treatment program)
932
E. 34th Street, Minneapolis
MN 55407
Children’s
Residential Treatment Cengter (Volunteers of America [VOA])/ MPS Metro C
(Residentiual Mental Health Treament program)
143E.
19th Street, Minneapolis MN
55403
Hennepin
County Juvenile Detention Center/ Stadium View Campus A
530
Park Avenue, Minneapolis MN
55415
Hennepin
County Adult Detention Center/ Stadium View Campus B
350
S. 5th Street, Room 36, Minneapolis
MN 55415
Minneapolis
and Teen Challenge/ Challenge Academy
(Residential
Chemical Dependency Program)
Page 9, July 2018
3231
1st Avenue S., Minneapolis MN 55408 (Teen Boys/Men)
1507
Lowry Avenue NE, Minneapolis MN 55418 (Teen Girls/Women
(6) On-site educational services, including
special education services, provided by MPS are available in the city of
Minnapolis at the following hospitals:
University
of Minnesoa Masonic Children’s Hospital/MPS Metro HA
2450
Riverside Avenue, Minneapolis MN 55454
Fuiarview
Riverside Hospital/MPS Metro HA
2312
South 6th St.
Minneapolis MN 55454
Tutoring
services on an as-needed basis are provided by MPS teachers at Shriner’s
Hospital, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis children’s Hospital, and
Hennepin County medical Center
(7) Early Childhood Special Education Services::
Home
services
Early
Childhood special Education Center
3228
Elliot Avenue South, Minneapolis MN 55407
Community-based
programs
(8) Transition Plus (Services for student 18-21)
3228
Elliot Avenue South, Minneapolis MN 55407
(9) MPS Contract Alternative Programs have
on-site special education services
American
indian OIC (Takoda Prep)
Loring
Nicollet Alternative Schools
Menlo
Park Academy High School
MERC
alternative High School
NaWayEe
Center School
PYC
Arts and Technology High Schools
Ronald
McDonald House
VOA
High School
(10)
Longfellow Alternative High School (3017 E. 31st Street,
Minneapolis MN 55406) and Wellsont International High School
(3328 Elliot Avenue South, Minneapolis
MN 55407) have on-site special
education services
(11)
Online Learning has available special education services
() Minneapolis Academy and Career Center has
available special education services
C. Available special education and related
services:
(1) Physical Therapy
(2)
Occupational Therapy
(3)
Speech services
(4) Deaf/Hard of Hearing (DHH) & Audiology
services
Page 10, July 2018
(5) Blind/Vision Impaired (BVI) services
(6) School social work services
(7) School psychology services
(8) Assistive technology
(9) Developmental Adaptive Physical Education
(DAPE) services
(10) Special Transportation Note: If a student who livges outside MPS boundary
open enrolls into MPS and requires special transportation to attend a MPS
school due to her/his disability, that special transportation service will be
included on the student’s IEP and provided by the district.
D. Restrictive Procedures
MPS
has a District Restrictive Procedures Plan, which can be found on the MPS
Special Eduction website at http://speced.mpls.mn.us
III. Administrative and Management Plan
MPS
utilizes the following administration and management plan to assure effective
and efficient results of child study procedure and method of providing special
education services for the identified pupils:
The
following table illustrate the organization of administration and management to
assure effective and efficient results of child study procedures and method of
providing special education services for the identified pupils:
(Table
same as that presented near the beginning of this chapter)
Additional
Information
B. Due Process assurances available to
parents: MPS has appropriate and proper
process procedures in place to assure effective and efficient results of child
study procedures and method of providing special education services for the
identified pupils, including alternative dispute resolution and due process
hearings. A description of these processes are as follows:
(1)
Prior written notice to a) inform the parent that except for the initial
placement of a child in special education, the school district will proceed
with its proposal for the child’s placement of for providing special education
service unless the child’s parent notifies the district of an objection within
14 days of when the district sends the prior written notice to the parent; and b) state that a parent who objects to a
proposal or refusal in the prior written notice may request a conciliation
conference or another alternative dispute resolution procedure.
(2)
MPS will not proceed with the initial evaluation of a child, the initial
placement of a child in a special education program, or the innital provision
of special education services for a child without the prior written consent of
the child’s parent or guardian. A
district may not override the written refusal of a parent to consent to an
initial evaluation or reevaluation.
(3)
A parent after consulting with health
care, education, or other professional providers, may agree or disagree to
provide the parent’s child with sympathometric medications unless medical,
dental, mental, and other health services are necessary, in the professional’s
judgment, that the risk to the
minor’s life or health is of such a nature that treatment should be
given without delay and the requirement of consent would result in delay or
denial of treatment.
Page 13, July 2018
(4)
Parties are encouraged to resolve disputes over the identification, evaluation,
educational placement, manifestation determination, interim alternative
educational placement, or the provision of a free appropriate public education
to a child with a disability through consultation, mediation, facilitated team
meetings, or other alternative process.
All dispute resolution options are voluntary on the part of the parent
and must not be used to deny or delay the right to a due process hearing. All dispute resolution processes are provided
at no cost to the parent.
(5)
Conciliation Conference: a parent has
the opportunity to meet with appropriate district staff in at least one
conciliation conference if the parent objects to any proposal of which the
parent receives prior written notice.
MPS will offer to the parent to have a conciliation confernc e within
ten calendar days from the date the district receives a parent’s objection to a
proposal or refusal in the prior written notice. All discussions held during a conciliation
conference are confidential and are not admissible in a due process hearing. Within five school days after the final
conciliation conference, the district will prepare and provide to the parent a
conciliation conference memorandum that describes the district’s final proposed
off of service. This memorandum isw
admissible in evidence in any subsequent proceeding.
(6)
In addition to offering at least one conciliation conference, MPS informs
parents of other dispute resolution
processes, including mediation and facilitated team meetings. The fact that an alternative dispute resolution
procedures was used is admissible in evidence at any subsequent
proceeding. State-provided mediators and
team meeting facilitators shall not be subpoenaed to testify at a due process
hearing or civil action under the special education law, nor are any record
mediators or state-provided team meeting facilitators accessible to the
parties.
(7)
Descriptions of the mediation process, facllitated team meetngs, state
complaint, and impartial due process hearings may be fund in MPS’s Procedure
Safeguard Notice, found at http://speced.mpls.k12.us/parental rights.
IV. Operating Procedures of Interagency
Committees
A. Community Transition Interagency Committee
MPs’s
Community Transition Interagency Committee (MCTIC) is individually established
in cooperation with Hennepin County for youth with disabilities beginning at
grade 9 or age equivalent, and their families.
Its primary purpose is to facilitate the development of programs and
services in Minneapolis that assist youth, ages 14-21, in their transition to
adulthood. A secondary purpose is the
development and implementation of systems and events which distribute timely
transition resource information to youth and their families.
For
2016-2017 MCTIC chaired by
MaryAnn
Sulik
Teacher,
MPS Transition Plus
Amber
Gunderson
Vocational
Rehab
The
MCTIC meets monthly on the second Wednesday from 2:00-3:30 at Minneapois
Federation of Teachers, 67 8th Avenue NE, Minneapolis MN
55413.
MCTIC’s bylaws and subcommittee
project procedures are attached as Appendices B and C.
Page 14, July 2018
B. Interagency Early Intervention Committee
Help
Me Grow represents early childhood for infants, toddlers, and preschoolers with
developmental delays or disabilities provided to eligible children and their
families. The regional interagency early
intervention committee (IEIC) is responsible for planning and implementing a
coordinated and comprehensive system for child find and public Awareness. The regional IEIC for the seven county metro
area is Region 11.
The
Region 11 IEIC meets quarterly. The
website for Region 11 can ve found at
Members of the Region 11 IEIC for 2017-2018
are
Parent:
Mai Chang (Chair)
Hennepin County Parent: Andrea Robinson
Ramsey County Parent: Jessica Mattson
Anmoka County Parent IEIC: Dana Nagel, Private Provider
Carver County IEIC: McKenna Quam, ECSE Coordinator
Dakota County IEIC: Janell Schilman, Social Services--- HelpMe Grow Interagency Coordinator
Minneapolis IEIC: Stephanie Graves, Maternal and Child Health
MCH Coordinator
North Suburban Ramsey/St. Paul IEIC: Jayne Cox Lindsey, St. Paul/North Suburban
Help Me Grow
Service Coordinator/Supervisor
NW Hennepin County IEIC: Susann De Tienne, Osseo School District
Service Coordinator
Robbinsdale IEIC: Jane Auger, Hennepin County Health Department
Scott County IEIC: Sharon DeZeeuw, Social Services Social work
Case Manager DD
South Hennepin County IEIC: Michelle Kvikstad, Bloomington ECSE
St. Paul IEIC:
Berenda Natalla, ECSE
Washington County IEIC: Pam Morrison, ECSE
West Suburban IEIC: Kristi Flesher, Orono Special Education
Health:
Laura Larson, Ramsey County Public Health
Human Services: Leigh Ann Ahmad, Ramsey County Disabilities
Services
County Board: Mary Jo McGuire, Ramsey County Board of
Commissioners
School Board:
Marilyn Forsburg, Spring Lake Park School Board
ECFE:
Sherry Haaf, St. Paul Schools ECFE
Joanne
Drahnak, Stillwater ECFE
Head
Start: Monica Torgerson, Anoka Co.
Community Action Program
School
Readiness: Nancy Wallace, St. Francis Early
Childhood
Current
Service Provider: Vacant
Children’s
Mental Health: Dave Runion, Family
Innovations
Physician: Sylvia Sekhon, M.D., Health Partners and U of
MN pediatric Residency Program
Advocacy
Groups: Judy Swett, PACE, Kab Nras &
Lee/Fowsia Elmi, The Arc Greater Twin Cities
Homeless
Shelters or Services: Mayme Petrich,
Homeless Services--- Perspectives
Staff: Marty Smith, IEIC Coordinator, Kathy McKay,
Child Find Coordinator, Sarah Ryan-Wood
The
region’s operating procedures are attached as Appendix D.
Page 15, July 2018
V. Interagency Agreements into which the
District has entered:
MPS
has entered in the following interagency agreements or joint powers board
agreements for eligible children, ages 3-21, to establish agency responsibility
that assures coordinated interagency services are coordinated, provided, and
paid for is facilitated from public and private sources:
1.
Operating Agreement for Joint Classrooms Between Parents In Community Action,
Inc. (PICA) d MPS
Terms
of Agreement: to provide appropriate
education service for children with disabilities and their families,
specifically children and families participating in PICA’s head Start program
and who are eligible for Early Childhood Special Education services provided
through MPS.
Agreement
Period: Signed 9/2012, Agreement to be
evaluated and revised on an annual basis as needed but unless changes are made
or action is taken to rescind via a 30-day notice, the Agreement remains in
force from the date signed.
2.
Facility Use Agreement Between MPS and
Catholic Charities
Terms
of Agreement: To describe the facility
arrangement with St. Joseph’s Home for Children Day Treatment Program to
utilize MPS-owned space to provide day treatment and educational services for
student in the day treatment progr4am.
Agreement
period: 7/1/17-6/30/20
VI. Special Education Advisory Council
In
order to increase the involvement of parents of children with disabilities in
district policy making and decision making, MPS has a special education
advisory council (SEAC). MPS’s Special
Education Advisory Council is individually established.
A. MPS’s Special Education Advisory Council
consists of the following individuals:
(1) Rochelle Cox MPS Special Education Director
(2) Christy Caez--- Chair, Parent of a student with special needs
(3) Sarah Washinton, Parent of a student with
special needs
B. MPS’s Special Education Advisory Council
meets the first Thursday of each month (except when it is a school holiday, and
then meets the 2nd Thursday) during the school year at the Davis
Center, Room S1-335.
C. More information about MPS’s SEAC can be
found at
VII. Assurances
Code
of Federal Regulations, section 300.201:
Consistency with state policies.
MPS in providing for the education of children with disabilities within
its jurisdiction, has in effect policies, procedures, and progams that are
consistent with the State policies and procedures established under
sections 300.101 through 300.163, and
sections 300.165 through 300.174 (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1413(a)(1).
Yes:
Assurance given.
Page 16, July 2018
MPS
TSES--- Appendix A
Minneapolis
Public Schools Birth-2 years Early Intervention Central Intake Protocol
Minneapolis
Public Schools Early Intervention Central Inake services are provided for
children birth through two years of age who may be experiencing delays in their
development for several reasons, including special health conditions. These services re designed to meet the unique
developmental needs of each child and their family.
Who
is eligible?
Ypung
children with developmental delays or with diagnosed physical or mental
condition or disorder with a high probability of resulting in a delay,
regardless of whether the child is currently demonstgrating a need or delay.
Inake
Process:
Minneapolis
Public Schools Early Intervention receives referrals by email, fax, or
phone. Referrals may be submitte through
the Minneasota Help Me Grow Program or directly to the Minneapolis Public
School Early Intervention Program.
Referrals are received from medical clilnics, hospitals, social workers,
community organizartions and families.
MPS
Early Intervention Central Intake Referral Process:
When
a referral is received
1. A student identification number (SIN) is
search in our student data system. If
the child I not in our system, they are added into discovery and a SIN is
created.
2. An intake form is completed with demographic
information and the reason for the referral.
The completed form is saved in our month referral file.
3. The student information is added to the
referral Birth to 2 years referral log.
4.
An initial contact is made to the family by call, email, or letter to inform
them that a referral has been received and to gather further information as
needed.
5.
A mailing is sent to the family which includes educational rights information,
a health and developmental history form and a cover letter exploring ECSE
services and avalaution process.
6. A paper student file is made and taken to
the ECSE Birth- 2 year evaluation team office.
The
frile is titled the Minneapolis Public School Special Education Due Process
File. The file paperwork includes the
following forms:
>>>>> Home Visit Safety Guidelines
>>>>> MDE Procedural Safeguards (in 4 languages)
>>>>> Parent Interview Form
>>>>> Child Observation Form
>>>>> Language Survey (English and Spanish)
Page 17, July 2018
>>>>> Documentation of Oral Interpretation Form
>>>>> Health and Development History Form
>>>>> Educational Data Release Form
>>>>> HC Follow Along Program Enrollment Form
(English and Spanish)
>>>>> Evaluation Report Form
>>>>> Birth-5 ECSE Placement Grid
>>>>> ECFE Referral Form
>>>>> Family Survey (English, Spanish, Somali)
>>>>> 3rd Party Payment Form Consent
form to submit reimbursement for IEP/IIIP Health Related Services
>>>>> Family Outcomes Survey (English, Spanish,
Somali)
>>>>> Conference Summary Notes
CH
1/10/13
Page 18, July 2018
PS TSES-Appendix B
Article
1
Authority,
Purpose, and Objectives
Effective
September 14, 2011
Section
1: Authority:
The
Minneapolis community Transition Interagency Committee, henceforth referred to
in this document as the MCTIC, is established to fulfill the requirements of
Minnesota Statues Chapter 125A.22, Community Tranistion Interagency Committee.
Section
2: Purpose
The
primary purpose of the MCTIC is to facilitate the development of programs and
services in Minneapolis that assist youth, age 14-21, in their transition to adulthood.
A
secondary purpose is the development and implementation of systems and events
which districbute timely transition resource information to youth and their
families.
Section
3: Objectives
As
specified in Minnesota Statues, Chapter 135A.22, the CTIC must
(1)
Identify current services, programs and funding sources provided within the
community for secondary and postsecondary aged youth with disabilities and
their families;
(2) Facilitate the development of multiagency
teams to address present and future transition needs of individual students on
their individual education plans;
(3) Develop a community plan to include mission,
goals, and objectives, and an implantation plan to assure that transition needs
of individuals with disabilities are met.
(4) Recommend changes or improvements in the
community system of transition services;
(5)
Exchange agency information as appropriate data, effectiveness studies, spcial
projects, exemplary programs, and creative funding of programs; and
(6)
Following procedures determined by the
commissioner, prepare a yearly summary assessing the progress of transition
services in the community including follow-up of individuals with disabilities
who were provided transition services to determine post=school outcomes. The summary must be disseminated to all adult
services agencies involved in trhe planning and to the commissioner by
September 1 each year.
Page 19, July 2018
Article
II
Membership
Section
1: Structure
The
structure of the membership is based on the goal of providing a leadership team
to direct the activities of the MCTIC and to include broad participation of
interested community entities towards the achievement of the Minnesota
statutes.
MCTIC
Governing Membership will consist of rrepresentatives from special education,
vocational and regular education, community education, postsecondary education
and training institutions, mental health, adults with disabilities who have
received transition services, parents of youth with disabilities, local
business, rehabilitation services, county social services, health agencies, and
additional public or private adult service providers as appropriate.
The
governing committee must elect a chair and vice chair. The secretary function shall be rotated at
meetings thus facilitating maximum engagement of all members throughout the
years. The membership will meet
regularly and establish a meeting schedule for the year prior to or during the
month of September.
a. Support Service Coordinator
b. Business and Industry representatives
c. County social service case managers
d. Rehabilitation Services counselor
e. Agency and program providers/vendors
f. Transporation representatives
g. Parents and students
h. Advocacy representatives
i. General edudation teachers
j. Government representatives
Section
2: Term
Members
will notify the chair or vice chair if they are unable to continue to serve on
MCTIC. Retiring members will suggest a
replacement who will be contacted by the chair or vice chair.
Page 20, July 2018
Section
3: Communication
The
governing MCTIC members and all subcommittee members agree to communicate with
the constituent they represent and will in turn provide feedback.
Communication
efforts include written or oral reports, newsletters, surveys, and email.
Article
III
Organizations
Procedures
Ng
schedule established
Section
1: Meetings
The
MCTIC will meet regulary according to a meeting schedule established prior to
or during September of each school year.
Subcommittees will meet as needed.
All meetings are open to individuals who have an interest in the MCTIC.
Section
2: Notification
Members
will be notified of all meetings.
Members are expected to attend and participate in meetings. Members who cannot attend a meeting are
encouraged to send a representative.
Section
3: Voting
Each
MCTIC member will have one vote on submitted items. A simple majority shall constitute a
quorum. A quorum shall be two thirds
(2/3) of the roster present at the first meeting each year. Decisions are determined by consensus
whenever possible or by vote of simple majority.
Article
IV
MCTIC
Administration
Section
1: Officers
The
MCTIC will have a chair and vice-chair.
The officers will be elected by the members and serve for two years.
Section
2: Officer Duties
The
chair will develop and distribute meeting agenda and minutes, convene and
altenate facilitation of MCTIC meetings with the vice-chair and serve as
spokesperson dfor the MCTIC.
The
vice-chair will perform the above listed duties in the absence of chair and
maintain the membership roster. Both the
chair and vice-chair will assist all committees and task groups in the
performance of their yearly plans.
Article
V
By-Law
Revisions
These
laws may be altered by a 2/3 vote of the MCTIC quorum providing that written
notice of the proposed action is provided by all members at least five days in
advance of the meeting.
Page 21, July 2018
MPS TSES--- Appendix C
Minneapolis
Community Transition Interagency Committee
Community Event /Project Participation
Request Procedures
This
document provides the rationale for abnd a process through which selection of
yearly MCTIC projects can occur.
The
Minneapolis Community Transition Interagency Committee (MCTIC) recognizes the
importance of implementing community projects that enhance opportunities for
the development of Minnesota youth with disabilities to successfully transition
to adulthood.
Toward
that end,
The
MCTIC will rfeview subcommittee project
proposals that
1)
Fall within the scope of MCTIC’s six tasks as defined by the Minnesota Statutes
Chapter 125A.22, Community Transition Interagency Committee.
2)
Align with the yearly MCTIC Action Plan
3)
Foster interagency, family, and youth collaboration and cooperation, including
shared goals and resources.
4)
Complete the Request Procedures detailed below
5)
Provide MCTIC with project evaluation demonstrating efficient use of fiscal and
human resources.
Project
Request Procedures
1) MCTIC subcommittee submits the completed
MCTIC Project Form to one of the MCTIC co-chairs
(see the attached)
2)
The request is presented at the next MCTIC meeting and discussed under New
Business
3)
MCTIC may accept, reject** or table a decision on the request for a subsequent
meeting in order to obtain more information or lack of a quorum;
4)
The subcommittee will know the decision at the meeting.
**Voting
procedures as stated in the MCTIC By-Laws
08.29.12
Page 22, July 2018
MPS TSES--- Appendix D
This initiative is made possible
through an interagency agreement from the Minnesota Department of Education to
the Metropolitan Educational Service Cooperative Unit (Metro ECSU) using
federal funding under CFDA 84.181 Special Education Grants for infants and
Families with Disabilities.
1/12/13
OPERATING
PROCEDURES
Region
11 Help Me Grow Interagency Early Intervention Committee (IEIC)
Glossary
of Terms
ICC--- Governor’s Interagency Coordinating Council
IEIC--- Interagency Early Intervention Committee
Regional
IEIC--- Region 11 Help Me Grow IEIC
Purpose
of the Committee
The
purpose of the Region 11 Help Me Grow IEIC is to develop and assure the
implementation of interagency policies and procedure in a way that is
consistent with other regions throughout the state, so that eligible children
birth to five and their families are identified and have access to appropriate
services and supports.
Requirements
of the Committee
Statutory
Requirements:
Purpose
of Interagency Early Intervention Committee:
M.S. 125A.3D
(a)
A school district, group of districts, or special education cooperative with
the health and human services agencies located in the county or counties in
which the district or copperative is locate, must establish an Interagency
Early Intervention Committee for children with disabilities under age five and
teir families under this section, and for children with disabilities ages 3-22
consistent with the requirements under sections 125A.023 and 125A.027. committees must include representatives of
local health, education, and county human service agencies, county boards,
school boards, early childhood family education programs, head Start, parents
of young children with disabilities under age 12, child care resource and
referral agencies, schoo readiness programs, current service providers, and may
also include representatives from other private or public agencies and school
nurses. The Committee must elect a chair
from among its members and must meet at least quarterly.
(b)
The Committee must develop and implement interagency policies concerning the
following
ongoing
duties:
1)
develop public awareness systems designed to inform potential recipient
families, especially parents with premature infants, or infants with other
physical risk factors associated with learning or development complications, of
available programs and services;
2) to reduce families’ need for future services,
and especdially parents with premature infants, or infants with other physical
risk factors associated with learning or development complications, implement
interagency child find systems designed actively to seek out, identify, and
refer infants and young children with, or at risk of, disabilities, including a
child under the age of three who (i) is
involve in a substantiated cse of abuse or neglect or (ii) is identified as
affected by illegal substance abuse, or withdrawal symptoms resulting from
prenatal drug exposure;
3)
establish and evaluate the identification, referral, child and family
assessment systems, procedural safeguard process, and community learning
systems to recommend, where necessary, alterations and improvements;
4)
assure the development of individualized family service plans for all eligible
infants and toddlers with disabilities from birth through age two, and their
families, and individual education plans and individual service plans when
necessary appropriately to serve children with disabilities, age three and
older, and their families and recommend assignment of financial responsibilities
to the appropriate agencies;
5)
implement a process for assuring that services involve cooperating agencies at
all steps leading to individualized programs;
6)
facilitate the development of a transitional plan if a service provider is not
recommended to continue to provide services;
7) identify the current services and funding
being provided within the community for children with disabilities under age
five and their families;
8)
develop a plan for the allocation and expenditure of additional state and
federal funding early intervention funds under United States Code, title 20,
section 1471 et seq (Part C, Public Law 108-446) and United States Code, title
20, section 631, et seq (Chapter I, Public Law 89-313); and
9)
develop a policy that is consistent with section 13.05, subdivision 9, and
federal law to enable a member of an interagency early intervention committee
to allow another member access to data classified as not public.
(a) The local Committee shall also
(1) participate in needs assessments and program
planning activities conducted by local social service, health, and eduction
agencies for young children with disabilities and their families; and
(2)
review and comment on the early intervention section of the total special
education system (TSES) for the
district, the county social service plan, the section or sections of the
community health services plan that address needs of and service activities
targeted to children with special health care needs, the section on children
with special needs in the county child care fund plan, sections in Head Start
plans on coordinated planning and services for children with special
needs, any relevant portions of early
childhood education, such as early childhood family education or school
readiness, or other applicable coordinated school and community plans for early
childhood programs and services, and the section of the maternal and child
health special project grants that address the needs of and service activities
targeted to children with chronic illness and disabilities.
Relationships/
Alignment/ Priorities
This
section serves to clarify the required roles of the state, regional and local
entities within the statewide early intervention system. Roles and responsibilities have either
changed how things have been done in the past or they have been clarified to
comply with state statute. Clarifying
the roles will help to ensure that communication occurs within and between the
three entities.
Page 24, July 2018
>>>>> Lead
Agency and State Partners: Minnesota
Department of Education is the lead agency for
Part
C Early Intervention services, with the
Minnesota Department of Health and Department of Human Services participating
as state partners, in delivering a comprehensive and coordinated interagency
system. State agency staff may attend
and participate in the Region 11 HELP ME GROW IEIC as ex officio members. Minnesota Department of Education will
determine a way to establish this across the state (i.e., state staff could be
a liaison with each region for attendance at meetings, etc.
>>>>>
Governor’s Interagency Coordinating Council (ICC): The Region 11 HELP ME GROW IEIC
Chair(s)
and a designee will attend the ICC meetings and report the business of the
Regional IEIC to the ICC in the role of
a guest when requested.
>>>>>
Special Education Administrative Units (SEAU): The Region 11 HELP ME GROW IEIC will
collaborate with SEAUs to examine and distinguish local vs. regional
priorities. Funding priorities will be
established to help guide funding decisions at the SEAU.
>>>>>
other local agencies: Linkage to
local entities (community-based service providers) should be maintained. SEAUs and local agencies will collaborate to
maintain established relationships.
>>>>>
Centers of Excellence fo young Children with Disabilities Project
(COE): The Region 11 HELP ME GROW IEIC
will collaborate with the COE to ensure that ongoing training needs are
met. The COE Will participate in
assessing district/locl agency needs for training. Districts are strongly encouraged to align
training with the COE to avoid duplication of training efforts.
Operational
considerations
Fiscal
host: Metro ECSU
The
agency designated as the fiscal host must be an eligible recipient of federal
special education finds and agrees to expend these funds consistent with the
approved budget and in accordance with the “Statement ofr Assurances” as signed
by the district special needs director and superintendent.
Local
Primary Agency (LPA): Metro CSU
The
LPA will perform duties consistent with Minnesota Statues, section 125A.31
including providing oversight of funds received through the annual fund
request, providing oversight for data collection efforts and the submission of
hearing procedures.
Maintain
documents: Local Primary Agency will
maintain IEIC documents: Examples of
documents include operating procedures, Work Plans, meeting minutes, fiscal
host, membership rosters, meeting signin sheets and other documents as
identified.
Website
posting:
Minutes,
agendas, etc.s need to be on a website.
Meeting minutes, decisions, and regional committee work could be placed
on the website to make information available to other stakeholders and
interested parties. It can be linked to
HELP ME GROW. There could be an
interactive map and a link from HELP ME GROW to the Reginal IEICs.
Date
privacy:
Member
agencies wll ensure the protection of the confidentiality of any personally
identifiable data, information, and record collected or maintained in
accordance with the protections under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy
Act (FERPA) and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
(HIPAA).
Process
to change Operating Procedures:
>>>>> Changes proposed at one meeting would be
voted on at the meeting or within two weeks
electronically
providing electronic quorum has been met.
(See description of a quorum on page 6)
Page 25, July 2018
>>>>> If
electronic voting is needed, proper documentation explaining the proposed
change will be sent with the request for electronic vote.
>>>>>
Within 30 days of the date the proposed change is received, it shall be
determined in writing to the IEIC Chair, who will then distribute the request
to the Regional IEIC membership (as defined below).
>>>>> The
membership shall have received the proposed amendment or amendments at least 14
days prior to the meeting.
>>>>> The
overall system will be evaluated using trhe same measures at 1 year and at 3
ywear mark to evaluate effectiveness and impact of the new structure. The interagency Coordinating Council will
create that process.
Demographics
>>>>>
Geographic ares served. All
school districts that fall within the 7 county metro area (Anoka, Hennepin,
Ramsey, Scott, carver, Washington, and Dakota).
Membership:
Mandated
Sector Membership requirement: (according
to statute)
Local
Helath--- county
Education
County
human services
County
board
School
board
Early
Childhood family Education Programs
Head
Start
Parents of young children with disabilities
under age 12 (One from each metro
county--- total of 7)
Child
Care Resource and Referral
School
Readiness programs
Current
service providers
May
also include representatives from
>>>>> Private agencies
>>>>> Public agencies
>>>>>
School nurses
Additional
Members identified
>>>>> One
representative from each of the former local IEICs. This will be re-determined in clonjunction
with membership changes, with some individuals possibly fulfilling two roles
(mandated membership role and optional role).
Other
members to be identified by the Region 11 Help Me Grow IEIC:
>>>>>
Children’s mental health
>>>>>
Advocacy
>>>>>
Pediatrician
Recrutiment
and Selection of Members: The current
membership list will be reviewed at each Membeership Subcommittee meeting. Any vacancies or necessary changes will be
Page 26, July 2018
Communicated
to the Region 11 IEIC chair(s) or IEIC staff.
Vacancies will be filled by having the members of the Membership
Subcommittee and IEIC staff contact local partners for nomination
recommendations. The membership Subcommittee
will forward to the Region 11 (IEIC for approval.
Chair,
Past Chair, and Chair-Elect
Terms
of office shall be for one year to match the fiscal year (July 1-June 30). The Chair will automatically serve as the
Past Chair the year following their term as Chair. The Chair elect will automatically serve as
chair the year following their term as chair-elect. The Chair/Past Chair/Chair elect will be responsible to facilitate the
Region 11 Help Me Grow IEIC meetings.
Assurance
of area representation: membership in
the Region 11 Help Me Grow IEIC will be representative of each geographic area
(including former local IEICs), cross sector in nature and will include the
legislatively required representation.
Each representative will be responsible to serve s a liaison for the
geographic area and the sector they represent and will maintain regular
communications between the Region 11 IEIC and their respective constituent
groups.
Removal/replacement: If a member of the Region 11 Help Me Grow
IEIC is not able to continue on the Regional IEIC, the vacancy must be filled
by another member from the same representative category.
In
the event a Regional IEIC member shall miss two consecutive IEIC meetings in a
twelve-month period without notifying the IEIC Chair(s) or IEIC staff, the
Chair(s) of the Regional IEIC shall have the right to remove the absent member
and the vacancy thereby created shall be filled as noted above.
Conflict
of Interest: Any individual working for
an agency that may benefit from a decision that is made would need to disclose
that potential conflict of interest. No
member of the Committee may cast a vbote on any matter that would provide
direct financial or other perceived benefit to that member or otherwise give
the appearance of a conflict of interest.
Terms
of membership: membership terms shall be
for three years. Terms swhall be
assigned randomly initially and shall be staggered so that approximately
one-third of the committee membership would be elected in any given year. There is not limit to the number of terms any
given member may serve. A member may
indicate aninterest in serving another three year term and, if selected by
their representative group as the nominee, the procedure documented above would
be followed.
Member
orientation: New Region IEIC members
wuill participate in an orientation session that will be scheduled prior to
attending an IEIC meeting whenever possible.
Attendance. When
members are unable to attend a schedules Region 11 help Me Grow IEIC
meeting, they must notify the Chair(s) or IEIC staff in writing prior to the
meeting. The absent member may assign a
designee and must notify the chair9s) or the IEIC staff in writing (email is
sufficient). The designee shall have the
authority to exercise the full privileges of the absent member. Designees must be representative of the same
sector as the absent member.
Meetings
Meeting
cycle: Region 11 IEIC will meet at least
four times per year (minimum frequency):
Page 27, July 2018
1st
Q: Summer
2nd
Q: Fall
3rd
Q: Winter
4th
Q: Spring
>>>>> Hold and annual meeting with the ICC, if
requested
>>>>> Meeting notification
Notices,
agendas, and supporting documents will be sent out electronically (unless
requested otherwise) 2 weeks prior to meetings.
Decision-making
process/voting:
>>>>> A member who is unable to attend a meeting
may vote on ny noticed action by submitting her or his vote in writing to the
Chair(s) in advance of the meeting in which the action will be taken. Such vote may be sent by mail, email, or
facsimile transmission.
>>>>> Region 11 Help Me Grow IEIC may not vot e
without a quorum. Two-thirds (2/3) of
the voting membership needs to be present at a meeting for quorum requirements
to bbe met.
>>>>> Electronic
Voting: The IEIC staff at the Metro ECSU
will work with the Region 11 Help Me Grow IEIC to facilitate electronic voting
on IEIC matters, as needed. Results of
electronic voting will be shared with the Region 11 IEIC as documents to future
IEIC meeting minutes.
>>>>> Decisions by the Region 11 Help Me Grow IEIC
shall, to the extent possible, will be made by consensus of members (and
designees), unless an exception is noted.
>>>>> If there is no consensus, decision shall be
made by a majority vote (51% or more) of the members (and designees).
>>>>> Hold when a decision cannot be reached, an
outside facilitator could be bought in to assist, if needed.
Distribution
of meeting minutes to other stakeholders, interested parties:
>>>>> There will be communication mechanisms
(e.g., website postings) in place to ensure that decisions and regional
committee work are available to all interested parties.
Standing
agenda format:
>>>>> The Region 11 IEIC will determine if a
standing agenda format is needed.
Reimbursement
policies:
>>>>> The Region 11 IEIC will determine if any
members or positions shall receive reimbursement for participation and duties
on the IEIC.
>>>>> If a Region IEIC member is serving within
her/his assigned job duties, expenses will not be reimbursed by the Regional
IEIC committee.
>>>>> Parent members (7) or their designee, if the
member is unable to attend, will receive a $50 stipend, plus mileage when they
attend a meeting.
Standing
Subcommittees: (optional)
>>>>> Subcommittees will have a chair and
memberships may include members from outside of Region 11 IEIC.
>>>>> At least one Region 11 IEIC representative
will be at subcommittee meetings.
>>>>> The committee structure shall be determined
by the Regional IEIC.
>>>>> The Chair(s of the Subcommittees will be
supported by the Region 11 IEIC Chair(s).
>>>>> The Region 11 IEIC Chair(s) shall appoiunt
IEIC members, community representatives, agency liaisons to each committee,
considering individual interests and expertise.
>>>>> Other workgroups and task forces may be
designate3d in order to conduct the business of the Regional IEIC.
Page 28, July 2018
>>>>> Suggested Committee could include
Communication
Membership--- determine terms of membership
Parent
Involvement
Public
Awareness/Child Find/Outreach
Cultural
& Linguistic Diversity
Budget
Subcommittee By-Laws
Core
values for the IEIC budget:
>>>>> Fiscal transparency
>>>>> Fiscal responsibility
>>>>> Communication
>>>>> Accountability and Equity
>>>>> Child-centered and family-centered
A.
Membership, Voting, Meeting Schedule
1.
Subcommittee members must be Region 11 Help Me Grow IEIC members and the
membership must be representative of the constituencies and include a
representative from the fiscal host.
2. Voting will take place on recommendations
that will be brought to the Region Help Me Grow IEIC.
3. A quorum will be present in order to vote on
an issue. Quorum is 2/3 of the members.
4. The Budget Subcommittee chair will bring
recommendations, reports and updates to the Region 11 Help Me Grow IEIC as
needed.
5. Budget Subcommittee meetings are open
meetings and the public may attend.
6. Budget Subcommittee will meet, at a minimum,
quarterly to review the budget prior to Region 11 IEIC meeting or more often,
as appropriate.
B. Fiscal Host Responsibilities
1.
The fiscal host will provide a minimum of quarterly updates on the budget and a
summary at the end of the State Fiscal Year which occurs annually in June 30.
2. The fiscal host representative will attend
Budget Subcommittee meetings as a nonvoting member.
3. The fiscal host will be responsible for
following requirements from the Minnesota Department of Education in all
subcontracts.
C. IEIC Budget
1.
The Budget Subcommittee will create an annual budget once the state allocations for Part E funds are available, based on the IEIC work plan. The annual budget will be submitted to the Region 11 Help Me Grow IEIC for approval prior ro submitting the annual work plan and budget to the Minnesota Department of Education (MDE).
The Budget Subcommittee will create an annual budget once the state allocations for Part E funds are available, based on the IEIC work plan. The annual budget will be submitted to the Region 11 Help Me Grow IEIC for approval prior ro submitting the annual work plan and budget to the Minnesota Department of Education (MDE).
2.
Budget reallocations or line item changes over 10% need to be approved by the
Budget Subcommittee.
D. Subcontracts or other distribution of funds
1. The Budget Subcommittee will develop specific
criteria for subcontracts according to the IEIC work plan.
2. If there are local entities wishing to
present proposals fdor funding considerations, a written proposal must be
submitted at least 2 weeks prior to the Budget Subcommittee meeting.
The
Subcommittee may defer making a deciswion on the funding proposal or request
further information. If the subcommittee
approves a request, it will be brought to the Region 11 Help Me Grow IEIC as a
recommendation for their approval.
Page 29, July 2018
3. Final approval of subcontracts must be given
by the Region 11 Help Me Grow IEIC based on a recommendation from the Budget
Subcommittee.
4. In order to expedite subcontracting, voting
can take place electronically.
5. Availability of subcontracts will be posted o
the Metro ECSU Region 11 Help Me Grow IEIC website.
6. Disputes regarding subcontracts will be
brought to the Budget Subcommittee for review and to make recommendations to
the Region 11 Help Me Grow IEIC for resolution or possibly assigned to the
appropriate subcommittee. The IEIC
budget should include a line item for mediation assistance, if needed to
resolve disputes.
Child
Find and Public Awareness Subcommittee By-Laws:
1. Membership in the Child Find and Public
Awareness subcommittee is established on an annual basis in order to ensure a
stable membership body for continuity.
2. Attendance at the subcommittee meetings is
required and members who are not able to attend must notify the subcommittee in
advance.
3. Individuals interested in joining may contact
the subcommittee chair.
4.
The Child Find and Public Awareness subcommittee may include individuals who
are not voting members of the IEIC.
5. New members must be approved by a majority
vote of the subcommittee.
6. Guests will be invitied to participate in
discussions on special topics, as needed.
Year
IEIC established: 2011
No comments:
Post a Comment