Jan 29, 2018

Laura Cavender, Associate Superintendent >>>>> Academic Results for Schools Supervised


Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) Associate Superintendent Laura Cavender is one of four staff members at the Davis Center (MPS central offices, 1250 Wewt Broadway) who occupy the associate superintendent position, which in each case is remunerated at a level of $144,330.

 

The Associate Superintendents report directly to Michael Thomas (Chief of Academics, Leadership, and Learning with salary of $163,761).  Inasmuch as Thomas’s Deputy Chief of Academics, Leadership, and Learning is Cecilia Saddler (salary, $151,980);  and Chief of Research, Innovation, Assessment, and Accountability Eric Moore (salary, $147,900) is by definition accountable for academic results for students in the Minneapolis Public Schools;  these two, along with Thomas, must be held responsible for the academic results produced at schools for which Cavender and the other associate superintendents have direct oversite.     

 

On the next few succeeding articles as you scroll down this blog, I will be giving data for the assessment of the performances of the individual associate superintendents.  All of these data and accompanying analysis is derived from material that I am entering into chapters of my substantially complete book, Understanding the Minneapolis Public Schools:  Current Condition, Future Prospect.

 

As you peruse the following data presentation, be attentive to the fact that Anishinabe, Bethune, Green, Hall, Jenny Lind, and Lucy Laney are all schools at which over 90% of students are on free or reduced price lunch, indicative of high concentrations of poverty;  Anwatin also has a high percentage of students on free and reduced price lunch (this school is located in the toney Bryn Mawr neighborhood, but is located just across a bridge from a very impoverished area along Glenwood Avenue in North Minneapolis---  and in general draws from a student population bused in from North Minneapolis).  The schools of Howe, Loring, Pillsbury, Sanford, and Waite Park vary from school to school but in general do not feature as many high poverty students in their populations.

 

Consider now the Minnesota Comprehensive Assessment (MCA) data for 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017 as pertinent to the school’s under Laura Cavender’s oversite:

 

Consider:

 

Percentages of Students Demonstrating Grade Level Achievement on the MCAs

>>>>>    Schools for Which Associate Superintendent Laura Cavender Has Responsibility                 

 

Anishinabe

 

      2014     2015     2016     2017

 

Math                             6%        12%        8%      8%

Reading                        7%          9%        9%      6%

Science                         1%          7%        2%      2%

 

Anwatin Middle School

 

2014     2015     2016     2017

 

Math                   32%     33%       24%      26%

Reading              28%     27%       24%      28%

Science               12%     13%       14%      14%

 

Bethune

 

2014     2015     2016     2017

 

Math                   12%     13%       19%      16%

Reading              10%     10%         9%      12%

Science                 5%     10%         7%        7%

 

 

Green Central

 

2014     2015     2016     2017

 

Math                   16%     18%       36%      34%

Reading              12%     17%       21%      17%

Science               11%       8%       16%      24%

 

 

Hall

 

2014     2015     2016     2017

 

Math                   29%     19%       12%      13%

Reading              25%     29%       21%      15%

Science               20%     17%         6%      12%

 

Howe

 

2014     2015     2016     2017

 

Math                   39%     61%       64%      67%

Reading              50%     62%       66%      70%

Science               43%     48%       61%      59%

 

Jenny Lind

 

2014     2015     2016     2017

 

Math                   19%     26%       29%      28%

Reading              15%     21%       23%      26%

Science                11%     13%       16%      18%

 

Loring

2014     2015     2016     2017

 

Math                   54%     43%       43%      39%

Reading              45%     45%       40%      38%

Science               27%     37%       36%      32%


Lucy Laney
 

2014     2015     2016     2017

 

Math                   13%     13%       24%      28%

Reading                9%     10%       13%      17%

Science                 6%        5%         8%      17%




Olson

2014     2015     2016     2017

 
Math                   14%     13%       11%      11%

Reading              19%     21%       24%      24%

Science                12%     5%         4%         2%

 

Pillsbury

 

2014     2015     2016     2017

 

Math                   55%     58%       45%      52%

Reading              37%     33%       32%      38%

Science               37%     30%       23%      31%

 

Sanford 

2014     2015     2016     2017

 

Math                   38%     42%       44%      39%

Reading              45%     49%       50%      49%

Science               34%     39%       37%      37%

 

Waite Park

 

2014     2015     2016     2017

 

Math                   60%     68%       64%      69%

Reading              55%     56%       57%      60%

Science               48%     49%       44%      56%

No comments:

Post a Comment