Feb 28, 2019

Article #2 in a Series >>>>> An Examination of the Ed Graff Record in Understanding Why He Does Not Deserve a Second Contract as Superintendent of the Minneapolis Public Schools >>>>> A Comparison of Student Academic Proficiency Levels During Graff’s Tenures in Anchorage (Alaska) and Minneapolis


Article #2 in a Series >>>>>  An Examination of the Ed Graff Record in Understanding Why He Does Not Deserve a Second Contract as Superintendent of the Minneapolis Public Schools  >>>>>  A Comparison of Student Academic Proficiency Levels During Graff’s Tenures in Anchorage (Alaska) and Minneapolis

This is the second article in my series examining the record of Ed Graff, conveying to readers why he does not deserve a second contract as superintendent of the Minneapolis Public Schools.

Other than that opening subjective statement, though, I am in these first articles in the series offering my readers strictly objective information from Ed Graff’s record as to credentials;  tenure in several capacities for the Anchorage, Alaska, schools;  and performance in the course of the two years and seven months that Graff has served as superintendent for the Minneapolis Public Schools.

I challenge my readers to consider why I would examine the record provided and recommend strongly against reappointment.  I surmise that for many readers this exercise may prove difficult, inasmuch as to those who do not understand the nature of credentials acquisition for professional positioning in locally centralized school systems, there may well be items in the Graff record that look appealing but are in fact distinct negatives.  Readers who have truly sought to go deeply with me over the course of the nearly 1,000 articles on this blog will most likely draw the same conclusions as have I.



Whichever sort of reader you are, please now continue your examination of the facts pertinent to the record of Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) Superintendent Ed Graff;  I now present a brief summary of student academic proficiency levels for a salient year (2014-2015) in Graff’s three-year term in Anchorage, Alaska;  I then give a summary of student academic proficiency levels for the last five academic years in the Minneapolis Public Schools, academic years 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 of which represent the first two years of three (current academic year 2018-2019 is the third) covering the term of Graff’s first contract.

Brief Summary of Achievement Levels during Ed Graff’s


Tenure as Superintendent in Anchorage, Alaska


 

Results for Academic Year 2014-2015

 

All Grade Levels

 

Language Arts

 

Does Not          Partially         Meets              Exceeds

Meet                 Meets             Standard         Standard

Standard          Standard

 

Student

Categories

 

African                  35.1%              42.1%               20.5%             2.3%

American

 

White/                 13.3%               33.7%               44.3%             8.5%

Caucasian

 

Hispanic               28.3%               42.3%               26.9%             2.5%

 

 

Alaska                   42.4%              37.5%                18.1%                 1.9%

Native

American/

American

Indian

 

All Grade Levels

 

Mathematics

 

Does Not      Partially      Meets          Exceeds

Meet              Meets         Standard     Standard

Standard       Standard

 

Student

Categories

 

African                  29.5%         51.3.%         16.9%          2.3%

American

 

White/                 12.9%          39.7%          36.5%         10.9%

Caucasian

 

Hispanic               23.4%          50.9%          21.8%           3.9%

 

 

Alaska                   29.0%          50.3%         18.2%           2.5%

Native

American/

American

Indian

 

MPS Academic Proficiency Rates for 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, & 2018

 

Math                     2014       2015       2016      2017      2018

 

African                  23%       19%         19%      16%       17%

American

 

American             23%        19%           19%       16%        17%

Indian

 

Hispanic               31%         32%          31%       29%        26%

 

Asian                     48%         50%          50%       44%        46%

 

White                   77%         78%          78%       77%        77%

 

Free/                     26%         26%          25%       24%        22%

Reduced

 

All                          44%         44%           44%     42%        42%

 

Reading               2014       2015       2016      2017      2018

 

African                  22%       21%         21%      21%       21%

American

 

American             21%        20%           21%       22%        23%

Indian

 

Hispanic               23%         25%          26%       26%        27%

 

Asian                     41%         40%          45%       38%        44%

 

White                   78%         77%          77%       78%        80%

 

Free/                     23%         23%          23%       25%        25%

Reduced

 

All                          42%         42%           43%     43%        45%

 

Science               2014       2015       2016      2017      2018



African                 11%       15%         13%      11%       10%

American

 

American             14%        16%           13%       16%        13%

Indian

 

Hispanic               17%         18%          21%       19%        17%

 

Asian                     31%         35%          42%       31%        34%

 

White                   71%         75%          71%       70%        71%

 

Free/                     14%         15%          17%       16%        15%

Reduced

 

All                          33%         36%           35%     34%        34%







No comments:

Post a Comment