Jan 14, 2020

Article #3 in a Three-Article Series >>>>> A Guide to Those Attending the Tuesday, 14 January Meeting of the Minneapolis Public Schools Board of Education >>>>> What to Expect at Any Given Meeting and at This Meeting in Particular


Moving left to right across the lineup seated on the raised platform at meetings of the Minneapolis Public Schools Board of Education during academic year 2019-2020 one will find eleven people who regularly deny to our children the education of excellence that is due to students of all demographic descriptors. 

 

At far left is KerryJo Felder, who represents MPS District #2 covering North Minneapolis.  Her concerns are focused on building and athletic field conditions, equitable distribution of resources, Full-Service Community Schools, and securing a vocational center for location at or near North High School.   She has no understanding of knowledge-intensive education and is ever hampered by her ties to the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers (MFT)/ Democrat-Farmer-Labor (DFL) cohort.  Felder will be a member of the board until the election of 2020, at which time we must have a candidate in place to replace her.

 

Next, moving left to right next to Felder is Bob Walser, the silliest and most trivial school board member I have witnessed during my five years of following developments at the Minnepolis Board of Education and, further, in my half-century of viewing similar spectacles in public education.  Walser represents District #4, including Bryn Mawr, toney Lowry Hill, and the communities around Uptown. He hails from the Walser auto-dealer family and is a total tool of the MFT/ DFL.  He often spouts the education professor jargon that I detail especially in part Three, Philosophy.  Walser is a hippy-dippy white liberal type who is clueless as to the academic aspirations of students and especially the needs of students from families facing dilemmas of poverty and functionality.  He frequently references Deborah Meyer, who along with such folk as Alfie Kohn, Ted Sizer, and Jonathon Kozol appropriates the name “progressive” and mumbles the education professor speak dating to John Dewey, William Heard Kilpatrick, and Harold Rugg in the 1920s.  This is the doctrine that has inflicted such knowledge-poor education on our students for at least forty years.  Walser’s seat is up for reelection in 2020;  he must be defeated.

Next you’ll observe Kim Caprini.  Caprini grew up on the Northside but mostly attended schools other than those of the Minneapolis Public Schools, inclduing Ascension and Benilde-St. Margaret.  Her two children, though, did attend MPS schools, and for many years Caprini has been a participant in various parent involvement activities.  But her comments as a member have been a disappointment.  She shows every sign of being the lackey of the MFT-DFL cohort that characterizes this iteration of the Minneapolis Public Schools Board of Education.

Next moving left to right school board attendees will see Nelson Inz who most abhorrently of all had no opposition for a seat that was up for reelection in 2018.  Inz represents District #5, east of I-35 in South Minneapolis);  he is the third most objectionable member of the MPS Board of Education, for which he serves as chair, having ironically defeated the second most objectionable member (Rebecca Gagnon) for that position last January 2018, and having endorsed the very most objectionable member (Bob Walser) in the latter’s defeat of incumbent Josh Reimnitz in the November 2016 election.  Inz is a Montessori-trained former bartender who now teaches in a Montessori charter middle school.  Inz has a habit of inflicting silly banter on his audience and gives every indication of being bought and paid for by the MFT/DFL.

Seated moving left to right from Inz one will observe MPS Superintendent Ed Graff.  Graff came from over fifteen years in Anchorage, Alaska, where he was a teacher, administrator, and superintendent.  His record there was academically abysmal, even as he touted the same Social and Emotional Learning formula that has served as one of his major initiatives at the Minneapolis Public Schools.  Three and one-half  years into his tenure at MPS, there has been no improvement in the academic program;  any potential for improvement will come from his masterful slimming and rationalization of the Davis Center (MPS central offices, 1250 West Broadway) bureaucracy and some unexpected epiphany regarding the need for knowledge-intensive curriculum and thorough teacher retraining for the delivery of such a curriculum.  Such an epiphany is not clear in the MPS Comprehensive District Design that he now touts.

Next to Graff, moving left to right, one will see Kim Ellison, a former vice-chair and current clerk of the board;  as clerk, Ellison heads the Policy Committee and keeps time limiting Public Comments speakers to three minutes (or to two minutes on those nights when numerous people have registered to make comments).  Ellison is a former alternative school teacher (at Plymouth [Christian] Youth Center]) and was formerly married to Keith Ellison, the Vice-Chair of the national Democratic Party and the winner in the 6 November contest for Attorney General.  Kim Ellison mostly listens, speaking (in a very soft voice) only to make a point that she deems germane.  But her comments never go to the core of any of the central dilemmas preventing officials and teachers at the Minneapolis Public Schools from imparting an excellent education to students of all demographic descriptors.  Ellison does not seem to grasp the problems pertinent to curriculum and teacher quality, forever impeded in the latter by her firm ties to the MFT/ DFL establishment.  Her seat will be up for reelection in 2020;  we must work toward her defeat.

 

Next one sees student representative Janaan Ahmed, whose term began in January 2019 and will end in December 2019.  Ahmed brought an impressive record of achievement and participation to her role but has not been discerning in her comments.  She gives impression of being in synch with this terrible assemblage of board members, either as a matter of deference or agreement.  Either way, Aamed has made little contribution to board meetings, failing conspicuously to address low student academic proficiency rates, knowledge and skill deficient curriculum, and poor teacher quality.   

 

Seated to the right of Ahmed is Jenny Arneson, the current treasurer who presides over finance committee meetings.  Arneson has abundant mastery of detail pertinent to finance and many other matters of the system as it is in the Minneapolis Public Schools;  she also grew up in Northeast Minneapolis, attended MPS schools, and has copious knowledge of her community.   But, as with all adult, voting members of this iteration of the board, Arneson has close ties to the MFT-DFL cohort that prevents her from addressing the ills that plague the district.

 

Finally, at the end of the row moving left to right the attendee will see Ira Jourdain (representing District #6), the first American Indian to serve on the school board.  Jourdain seems to have a more elevated ability to process adverse commentary than do most other board members, but he gives many indications of being impeded by his MFT/ DFT association.

………………………………………………………………………………..

Among the agenda items specific to the particular meeting of 14 January 2020 will be the election of new officers.  A new president and vice-president of the MPS Board of Education Board will be elected and members will indicate preferences for committee assignments.  Nelson Inz, who has served two one-year terms as president, is not running again.  Look for Kim Ellison to become the new president of the board and for Jenny Arneson to become vice-president.  Kim Caprini, who has served for one one-year term as vice-president will most likely gain appointment as Chair of the Finance Committee.

Other agenda items for the meeting will include seating of new student representative to replace Janaan Ahmed (who has served the regular one-year term for the position), a review and vote on Policy 4026, annual financial authorizations, consideration of the 2020 Legislative Agenda, a vote on a 2020 Census Resolution, review of the 2020-2021 Capital Plan, and approval of an MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) with the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board.

                                                                                                                                                                                    

No comments:

Post a Comment