Jun 18, 2019

>Journal of the K-12 Revolution: Essays and Research from Minneapolis, Minnesota<, Volume V, No. 11, May 2019 >>>>> Article #1 >>>>> Introduction: A Highly Consequential Vote of the Minneapolis Public Schools Board of Education on 12 March 2019 to Extend a New Three-Year Contract to Superintendent Ed Graff


When members of the Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) Board of Education voted 8-0 (KerryJo Felder was not in attendance) on Tuesday, 12 March, to extend a new contract to Superintendent Ed Graff and expressed their reasons for trusting his academic leadership, the current condition of the school district reached clarity:

 

There are no prospects for achieving academic excellence under this superintendent and even less with this composition of the MPS Board of Education. 

 

There is not enough substance to the four-point program focused on social and emotional learning, multi-tiered system of support, literacy, and equity;  or the MPS Comprehensive Design;  to promote hopes that a knowledge-intensive, skill-replete education can be imparted to students under this superintendent or this board.

 

The board is even worse than the superintendent as to matters of academic import.  There is no agreed upon driving philosophy expressed by the board, and what can be gleaned from member comments is dauntingly negative.  There is an anti-assessment slant to the views of the board;  Bob Walser has been silent of late but for many weeks was the chief opponent of assessments, among which at the Minneapolis Public Schools are the Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments (MCAs) and the National Assessment of Academic Progress;  now Ira Jourdain has suddenly surged to the fore with anti-assessment comments. 

 

But no one on the board seems interested in academic assessments or the close questions of highly adept research and evaluation chief Eric Moore, as was Tracine Asberry during her tenure on the MPS Board of Education.  Nor does this board seem very interested when I cite the many examples of wretched teaching and classroom situations:  an English teacher at North High School who assigned the Autobiography of Malcom X but seemed to know nothing about the life of the great leader herself;  a geometry class at the same school that was so out of control that students were learning nothing about the subject;  a free day for watching movies given to all students on Friday, 8 March, at Franklin Middle School, wherein a social studies teacher had in a major erroneous comment placed Mayan civilization near the Amazon River.

 

MPS Superintendent Ed Graff holds a B.A. in Elementary Education and an M. A. in Educational Administration.  Pursuing these degrees was professionally rational for Graff, inasmuch as he aspired to the noble position of elementary teacher before taking the route to more lucrative remuneration

in becoming an administrator.  But elementary education programs present the least academically substantive curriculum on any college campus;  and the courses in Graff’s educational administration degree program at Southern Mississippi University were mostly online.  Nowhere in his university training did he deeply study any major discipline (e. g., mathematics, biology, English literature, history, economics).

 

Three members (KerryJo Felder, Kim Caprini, Ira Jourdain) of the Minneapolis Public Schools Board of Education hold no four-year college degree, and the board is in general devoid of academic acuity.  This, taken together with Graff’s insubstantial academic training, presents the spectacle of an academically disinclined leadership for an institution that exists to provide academic knowledge sets to students of all demographic descriptors.

 

That is a conundrum that highlights the silliness of the MPS Board of Education vote on 12 March 2019

and argues for eventual jettisoning of Graff as superintendent and the overhaul of the current board, beginning with the elections of November 2020.

No comments:

Post a Comment