May 29, 2019

Meeting (5:30-7:30 PM) Today (Wednesday, 29 May) at the Davis Center Should Be Seen as an Opportunity to Address the Failures of the MPS Department of Indian Education led by Anna Ross

A 5:30-7:30 PM meeting today at the Davis Center (Minneapolis Public Schools [MPS] central offices, 1250 West Broadway) under the aegis of the Metropolitan Urban Indian Directors (MUID) should be seen as an opportunity to ask hard questions of Executive Director Anna Ross and other staff of the MPS Department of Indian Education regarding the dismal academic proficiency rates among MPS Native American students.

 

As gleaned from a statement of MUID leaders concerning the Franklin-Hiawatha housing struggle, the organization, Metropolitan Urban Indian Directors (MUID), is a coalition of leaders representing Native American organizations and official tribal groups in Minneapolis. Membership includes nonprofits focused on the provision of services or issues pertinent to health services, education, housing, and economic development.  The MUID organization is partner in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the City of Minneapolis;  the MOU provides a framework for the city’s engagement with the Native American community.

 

Recently, leaders of MUID sought to connect grassroots groups, public entities, and private sector organizations endeavoring to address housing issues relevant to the Franking-Hiawatha encampment.  Leaders of MUID are seeking to work with multiple groups to create long-term solutions to homelessness among Native Americans and others in Minneapolis.  Leaders of MUID seek to build a sustainable, long-term, coordinated effort that acknowledges those aspects of indigenous peoples’ history that have created the contemporary situation.  

 

Each spring Anna Ross and other staff from the MPS Department of Indian Education gather to report on developments at MPS schools that serve heavily American Indian populations.  These schools include Anishinabe Elementary, NaWayEE Center School, and American Indian OIC/Takoda Academy.

 

Those attending the meeting should keep in view the following academic performance of MPS American Indian students over the course of the five academic years ending in 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018.

 

MPS Academic Proficiency Rates for 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, & 2018

 

Math                     2014       2015       2016      2017      2018

 

American             23%        19%           19%       16%        17%

Indian

 

Reading               2014       2015       2016      2017      2018

 

American             21%        20%           21%       22%        23%

Indian

 

Science                2014       2015       2016      2017      2018

 

American             14%        16%           13%       16%        13%

Indian

 

Performance and profile for Anishinabe Elementary is as follows:

 

Percentage of Students Proficient on the

Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments (MCAs),

Academic Years ending in 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018

 

Anishinabe Elementary School                 Principal >>>>>   Laura Sullivan

 

Math                     2014       2015       2016      2017      2018

 

                                  6%          12%         8%          8%          8%

 

                                (186)      (172)      (156)     (156)     (98)

                                                                               

Reading               2014       2015       2016      2017      2018

 

                                  7%           9%          9%          6%         16%

 

                                (186)      (172)        (156)      (156)    (98)

 

Science                  2014       2015       2016      2017      2018

 

                                   1%         7%           2%          2%         14%

                               

                                 (69)       (59)          (45)        (44)      (21)

 

Student Population

 

Enrollment:  not tabulated as yet by MPS officials

 

                                                Percentage of                   Percentage of

                                                Enrollment at Site           Enrollment

             Districtwide

 

Native American                     78%                                       4%

African American                    10%                                     36%

Asian American                         0%                                       6%

Hispanic American                 10%                                     20%

White American                       2%                                     34%

English Learners                        1%                                     24%

Receiving Free or                   97%                                     63%

         Reduced Price Lunch

Receiving Special                   18%                                     14%

         Education Services

     

Contact Information

 

3100 E. 28th Street

Minneapolis  MN  55406

Grades PreK-5

Principal:  Laura Sullivan

Hours:  8:40 AM-3:10 PM

Phone:  612-668-0880

FAX:       612-668-0890


Website:  anishinabe.mpls.k12.

 

District information on the academic performance at American Indian/OIC is sketchy.  The reading proficiency rate in academic years 2013-2014 and 2016-2017 was fourteen percent (14%);  The science proficiency rate in academic year 2015-2016 was seventeen percent (17%).  Data for other categories and in other years is missing, raising questions regarding attendance and fulfillment of assessment obligations.

 

Staff at Takoda Prep/American Indian OIC assert that the school is “focused on helping all students make advances in reading, writing, and mathematics while making a strong connection to American Indian culture.”  Those at NaWayEE School seek to serve at-risk students as described in MN Statute 126.22.

 

The Department of Indian Education identifies the following as four key services provided by staff members:

 

1)  Support for Instruction

 

2)  Support for Family involvement

 

3)  College Readiness

 

4)  Advocacy for Families

 

The Mission of the Department of Indian Education is given as follows:

 

Improve Native American achievement and graduation rates through academically rigorous culturally responsive instruction, family and student engagement, and collaborative partnerships with schools and communities.

 

The Vision of the Department of Indian Education is given as follows:

 

All American Indian students are empowered as lifelong learners to be fully engaged leaders, stewards, and citizens.

 

National American Indian/OIC President/CEO Joe Hobot received press coverage on 29 June 2017 for his touting of Takoda Prep’s success in closing the achievement gap.  But as in similar claims regarding bridging of that gap, reality confronts verbiage.  The claim had little to do with academic performance:  The only achievement cited was implicit in a comparison with graduation rates at the Minneapolis Public Schools for Native American students as a whole with those at Takoda Academy;  for MPS Native American students as a whole, the graduation rate  in 2017 was thirty-six percent (36%);  for Takoda Academy, the corresponding figure was eighty-five percent (85%).  In the Minneapolis Public Schools, graduating students lack proper academic preparation for postsecondary education;  this is even truer for alternative schools:  Graduation rates do not equate with academic achievement.  

 

Anna Ross’s salary increased from $116,509 in December 2017 to $119,422 in February 2019.

 

Her department has been a failure in promoting academic achievement among American Indian students in the Minneapolis Public Schools.  The MPS Department of Indian Education exists via government mandate.  But the staff can be called to account for their dismal performance and dismissed for their failures.  They are fulfilling neither their expressed mission nor their vision.

 

Hard questions should be asked at today’s meeting.

 

I will ask those questions.

May 28, 2019

J-E History II >>>>> Seeking Divinity, Part One


Clear now as to Her Values, She searched for Divinity in history, poetry, and prophesy.

 

Peering through the Tunnel of History, Female saw the story told by Male, that tale in which domination guided action, thought, and the contents of the story as told by him.  She endured the litany of judges, kings, and rivals;  she noted that even queens collapsed in the mire of corruption and amidst the snares set by him.  Life as seen by Male consisted of incessant warfare, territorial acquisition and loss, the constant striving to separate one people from another, the quest for power for the sake of power, the desire to subdue the Other, whether on the battlefield on in the harem.  Female knew that much of history had been grim and that most of the events conveyed by Male were either factually or thematically true.  But he had dominated the recording:  So much had gone untold.

 

She spilled out of the Tunnel of History onto the broader Plain of the Past.  There she gained the perspective of a wider field of vision.  She came to understand that the nature of the search and the quality of deeds exhibited by Male were grounded in something very important.  Male wanted meaning:  why he was Here and where he was heading in Eternity.  He wanted security:  perceived opponents loomed, presumed enemies abounded, others in the land seemed to be competing for what he wanted and seeking to take what he had.  And he ached to know the course of Creation, the nature of the Source, the path to deep connectedness with the Divine.

 

Moving farther from the Tunnel of History, roaming farther and wider on the Plain of the Past, Female discerned that Male’s search had been profound but that his pathways had been errant, his conclusions mundane, his actions destructive.  Female felt the poignancy of Male’s boastfulness, his pride, his quest for power, his desire to dominate.  She knew that all of these had arisen from Fear, the Enemy that he projected onto his fellows, life, her.          

 

Her sojourn led next to the Path of Eternity.  Nature, Music, and Art motioned her ahead to a  Land that promised meaning, security, connectedness.  Poets and Prophets led her forward through Echoes of the Past and Promise of the Future.  She discerned the Echoes, comprehended the Promise, and took abundant joy in what this meant for Male and Female in connection with the Divine.  

May 21, 2019

Introduction to the Proposed Preliminary Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) Comprehensive District Design, with Thoughts on the More Important Matter of Hiring a Proponent of Knowledge-Intensive Education as Chief Academic Officer >>>>> Approve the Plan, Then Get on with Bringing Knowledge-Intensive Education to MPS Students


Readers will find as they scroll on down this blog a complete presentation of the proposed preliminary Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) Comprehensive District Design, as revealed by district officials Eric Moore (Chief of Research, Evaluation, Assessment, and Accountability;  and Interim Chief of Academics, Leadership, and Learning), Cecilia Saddler (Deputy Chief of Academics, Leadership, and Learning), and Rochelle Cox (Executive Director of Special Education) at the meeting of the MPS Board of Education on Tuesday, 14 May.


 

Development of the Design began with Superintendent Ed Graff and other MPS officials conferring with consultant Dennis Cheesebrow (TeamWorks International) during the 2017-2018 academic year;  Cheesebrow researched and presented information pertinent to demographics in Minneapolis; disaggregated data concerning academic performance of MPS students;  the phenomenon of families seeking charter school, parochial school, and private school alternatives to MPS;  and prospects for attracting students back to the district.

 

On a Saturday morning in October 2018, an important meeting (open to the public) was held that gave attendees a view of the preliminary MPS Comprehensive District Design.  There was much talk at the time, and there continues to be much talk by district officials as to the preliminary nature of the Design, which still is open for comment by members of the public and members of the MPS Board of Education.  But the thrust of the Design is clear, and the current detailed version is highly consistent with the sketchier plan as given in October 2018, so that those examining the Design may form their own views either for or against the plan with a clear understanding of what officials are conveying or not conveying in terms of ideas undergirding the Design and means of implementation. 

 

Examination of the Design is one of the last tasks for me as I produce the refined version of my book, Understanding the Minneapolis Public Schools:  Current Condition, Future Prospect.  Look for detailed analyses in the coming days.  I want my readers to have an opportunity to review the Design and form their own opinions before I present my own full analysis.  I will, though, offer this comment as readers make their own determinations:

 

The Minneapolis Public Schools Comprehensive Design is strongest in identifying the subjects at the core of a well-rounded education, consistent with content given in the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA);  and in the very thoughtful organization of special education programming detailed for every MPS school.  The plan gives a much less tangible presentation of strategies for improving student academic performance.

 

The murkiness of methods proposed in the Design for improving academics at the Minneapolis Public Schools makes all the more important the hiring of a proponent of logically sequenced knowledge-based education as the new Chief of Academics, Leadership, and Learning (best simplified to “Chief of Academics”).

 

I have presented the MPS Comprehensive District Design in five articles immediately following this entry:

 

Article #1 gives the opening pages of the Design, which presents an overview of the principles guiding the Design and strategies for improving academic performance.

 

Article #2 gives the first part of a lengthy Appendix, which in the beginning focuses on proposed academic strategies pertinent to Career Technical Education, Middle Grades, STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics), Comprehensive Plan for the Arts, and Ethnic Studies.

 

Article #3 gives the part of the Appendix covering the Comprehensive Districtwide Assessment Implementation Plan.

 

Article #4 gives the part of the Appendix covering the Redesign for Special Education.

 

Article #5 gives the part of the Appendix covering the four MPS priorities under Superintendent Ed Graff:  Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS), Social Emotional Learning (SEL), Equity, and Literacy.

 

……………………………………………………………………………………

 

Understand that MPS officials are holding a number of community engagement meetings to present the MPS Comprehensive District Design to the public and to get feedback from the latter.

 

Meetings that have already been held include the following:

 

Community Engagement Opportunities

30 April

Latino Parent Advisory Committee

 

3 May

Somali Parent Advisory Committee

 

9 May

Special Education Advisory Committee

 

13 May

Edison High School          

 

15 May

MFT and ESP members (tentative)

 

16 May

Southwest High School

 

20 May

Wilder

 

Those that remain on the calendar, including a meeting scheduled for today, are as follows:

 

Community Engagement Opportunities

21 May

 

Davis Center

 

22 May

 

Latine community presentation at Waite House

 

23 May

 

Heritage Family Night @ Hmong International Academy

 

30 May

 

Black Parent Advisory Committee

 

30 May

 

Title VI Parent Advisory Committee

 

13 June

 

Special Education Advisory Committee

 

TBD

 

>>>>>    Internal engagement with MPS staff (departments and school staff)

 

>>>>>    Individual and group meetings with key community influencers (Board and Leadership)

 

>>>>>    Ongoing engagement June-August (Calendar of Events Summer 2019)

 

………………………………………………………………………………..

 

My own essential view, very likely consistent with the analysis that I will present later on this blog and will include in Understanding the Minneapolis Public Schools:  Current Condition, Future Prospect, is that the Design should be approved at the August meeting of the MPS Board of Education;  that great care should taken by Graff and other MPS officials in hiring a proponent of logically sequenced knowledge-intensive education;  and then that the most important work of improving the academic program should move forward on the basis of my own five programmatic emphases:  1) curriculum overhauled for knowledge intensity;  2) thorough training of teachers capable of imparting such a curriculum;  3)  provision of academic enrichment opportunities for an hour each day at the K-5 level, including highly intentional skill remediation for academically lagging students;  4) the provision and referral of services to struggling families, in conversation with staff comfortable on the streets and in the homes of students right where they live;  and 5) continued reduction of the Davis Center (MPS central offices, 1250 West Broadway) bureaucracy so as to garner resources for the four programmatic features above.

 

My fundamental recommendation, then, is to

 

approve the plan, hire a worthy Chief Academic Officer, and move forward for work on the ground that will deliver a knowledge-intensive education of excellence to students of the Minneapolis Pubic Schools.

 

……………………………………………………………………………………

 

Please now proceed to the five articles that present the proposed Minneapolis Comprehensive District Design, which MPS officials emphasize is a preliminary document, pending further refinement in the aftermath of public and MPS Board of Education comment:

 

Article #1 >>>>> Board of Education Comprehensive Design Presentation 2019-2022 >>>>> General Overview and Overview of Plan for Improved Academic Achievement


Board of Education

Comprehensive Design Presentation

2019-2022

 

A holistic approach to better

outcomes for all students

 

MPS

Minneapolis Public Schools

Urban Education, Global Citizens

 

Plan >>>  Do  >>>  Check  >>>  Act

 

Overview of Comprehensive District Design

 

Overview

 

Goal >>>>>

 

To ensure all MPS graduates have a well-rounded education and are equipped with the academic, social/ emotional, and technical skills to be successful in college and/or career.

 

Our planning principles

 

>>>>>    Focus on the needs of students and families

>>>>>    Improve Achievement for all students

>>>>>    Align resources to provide predictable staffing and programming

>>>>>    Make recommendations that are sustainable and achievable

>>>>>    Examine all assumptions and recommendations through a racial equity lens

 

Elements of the Comprehensive Design

 

1   >>>>>    Improved Academic Achievement

2   >>>>>    Sustainability and Increased Market Share

3   >>>>>    Equitable Programming and Choice

 

Improved Academic Achievement

Overview

 

Academic Achievement Goal

 

MPS will graduate students with a well-rounded

education regardless of zip code

 

>>>>>    PreK-12 curricular offerings will support MPS’s academic goal

>>>>>    Programming and pedagogy will be academically rigorous and culturally relevant

>>>>>    Students will have equitable access to high quality academic offerings

>>>>>    Students and families will experience safe, welcoming, and respectful interactions in

All MPS schools, sites and services  

 

ESSA Definition of a Well-Rounded Education

 

>>>>>    MPS supports the federal definition of a well-rounded education

 

>>>         …..  courses, activities, and programming in subjects such as English, reading, or language arts, writing, science, technology, engineering, mathematics, global languages, civics and government, economics, arts, history, geography, computer science, music, career and technical education, health, physical education, and any other subject, as determined by State of local educational agency, with the purpose of providing all students access to abn enriched curriculum and educational experience.

(Every Student Succeeds Act: S. 177-298)

 

New to ESEA, and included in ESSA’s well-rounder definition:

 

>>>>>    Writing

>>>>>    Engineering

>>>>>    Music

>>>>>    Health

>>>>>    Technology

>>>>>    Computer Science

>>>>>    Career and Technical Education  

>>>>>    Physical Education

 

MPS Instructional Model

 

All students will be able to demonstrate and articulate to parents their

 

>>>>>    Classroom Theory of Action

>>>>>    Multi-Tier Systems of Support

>>>>>    Level 1-3 Special Education Services

>>>>>    Level I-III Advanced Academics in All Schools

>>>>>    The integration of Social and Emotional Learning

and career/life skills in the instructional design   

>>>>>    Individualized learning options for all students

 

Improved Academic Achievement Planning Recommendations

 

Academic Strategies

 

The Design will support academic strategies that specifically promote

 

>>>>>  Individualized approaches to instruction

 

>>>  begins with pre-kindergarten with differentiated

high-quality coursework ligned to state standards

 

>>>  enriched to result in a well-rounded education

>>>>>  Equitable access to academic, arts, athletics, activities, service learning, and career/college programming

 

MPS will support academic strategies that promote

 

>>>>>  Foundational academics for elementary students

 

>>>  Build creative, critical thinkers, with access to accelerated learning opportunities and music education during and after school

 

>>>>>  Rigorous coursework for middle grade students

                                             

>>>  Builds on their foundational skills, with continued access to accelerated learning and at least one world language

 

>>>>>  Challenging options for high school students

                                             

>>>  Relevant core instruction, rigorous and meaningful elective options, and access to career and technical exploration, PSEO, and accelerated learning options

 

Four Core Priorities

 

>>>>>    Equity

>>>>>    Multi-Tiered System of Support 

>>>>>    Social Emotional Learning

>>>>>    Literacy

 

Academic Strategies

 

Deeper Investment and Expansion of Effective programming (K-12)

 

>>>>>    Continue focus on four core priorities:  Literacy, MTSS, SEL, and Equity

>>>>>    Greater alignment and consistency of Multilingual programming   

>>>>>    Implement restorative practices system-wide   

>>>>>    Expand ethnic studies  courses at high schools 

>>>>>    Explore project-based learning in selected 9th grade ELA classrooms 

>>>>>    Launch CTE redesign and expansion  for secondary

>>>>>    Continue focus on four core priorities 

 

Pilot innovative programming;  focus on students facing the most significant academic disparities

 

>>>>>    Explore new optons and rethink the Technology offerings in the district, whether through

CTE or district-wide technology programs to include world-relevant experience in education and careers, especially in the field of Cyber Security

>>>>>    Explore technology based personalized learning partnership for middle grades (pilot at Franklin, Olson, Northeast, and Sanford)

>>>>>    K-2 literacy initiative for African American and American Indian students not proficient

>>>>>    Launch American Indian Achievement Initiative cohort (Anishinabe, Northeast, Sanford, South, and Edison)   

>>>>>    Explore partnership with Children’s Defense Fund to develop and pilot Freedom School model into full-year program setting (pilot in Region 1 and Zone 1 elementary)

 

Academic Strategies:  Special Education

 

>>>>>    Shift from “Citywide” to “Specialized Programs” located in each zone and designed for both student needs and disability areas

>>>>>    Every comprehensive middle and high school serves all students regardless of disability and/or level of service needed, thus allowing school choice for every student 

>>>>>    Group elementary  schools in clusters to provide specialized programs with at least two classrooms together and no more that 4 classrooms together   

>>>>>    Specialized Programs have space for specialized programming in the areas of SEL and Sensory Interventions

>>>>>    Create Specialized Pathways in each Zone to allow students to progress through grades with classmates 

 

Academic Strategies:  Dual Language

 

>>>>>    Ensure students can compete in a global society by speaking, reading, and writing in a language other than English

>>>>>    Promote opportunities for rigorous academic programming

>>>>>    Increase market share along the K-12 continuum

>>>>>    Create equitable space for native speakers of Hmong and Spanish to achieve academically in the home language and English

>>>>>    Uphold district priorities of Literacy, Equity, Social Emotional Learning, and MTSS through the lens of multilinguyal learning 

>>>>>    Expand and consolidate existing Transitional Dual Language programs that end at 3rd grade to One Way Dual Language Programs (OWDL) that will go up to 5th grade.  This will enable students to participate in K-12 Dual Language pathway.