The
Ed Graff administration submitted as its response to Minnesota Department of
Education (MDE) World’s Best Workforce (WBWF) regulations the following programs
for academic year 2017-2018, with number of students served given in
parentheses:
WBWF
Program
(to prepare children to enter
school, third graders to read, students of all ethnicities and at all economic
levels to meet grade level standards, all students for career and college, and
all students to graduate from high school)
AVID
[Advancement Via Individual Determination] (1,921)
Check
and Connect (616)
Ethnic
Studies & Social Justice Fellows (544)
Fast
Track Scholars (189)
GEMS
& GiSE (4,221)
[Girls in Engineering,
Mathematics, and Science;
Guys in Science and Engineering]
Grow
Your Own Teacher Residency (3,394)
Jobs
for America’s Graduates (167)
MTSS/
Multicultural Materials (6,984)
LearningWorks
at Blake (91)
Office
of Black Male Achievement (348)
Project
SUCCESS (15,229)
RIS
(Racially Identifiable Schools) Direct Support (10,537)
Spring
and Winter Academy (5,220)
Urban
Debate League (394)
……………………………………………….
……………………………………………….
These
programs come with significant outlays in the MPS budget but are also heavily
subsidized by the provider organizations, making the programs appealing. But despite the appealing appellations, most
of these programs serve only a scant fraction of students enrolled in the
Minneapolis Public Schools and not one of them is capable of raising
achievement levels across the K-12 years.
Most of these programs have been around for many years; fewer than 25% of African American, American
Indian (Native American), Hispanic, Hmong, and Somali students are meeting
grade level standards in reading and math.
Thus,
these seductively labeled and heavily subsidized programs offer an attractive
screen for presentation to the MDE for working to promote academic achievement,
but there is nothing behind that screen that offers hope for raising
achievement rates.
Beyond
these programs, the Ed Graff administration offers Social and Emotional
Learning and a new PK-5 reading curriculum, the former of which can never be
more than an adjunct to explicitly academic initiatives, the latter of which is
limited to reading. That new Benchmark
Literacy Program is
sound in approach but prospects for success will be constricted by the mediocrity
of K-5 teachers and the weakness of literature and English language usage
programming in grades 6-12.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
As
to the MFT, the ten-point program offered by the union as a basis for current
contract negotiations is as follows:
1) Beyond
Academics: Educating the Whole Child
2) Smaller
Class Sizes
3) Students
are More Than a Test Score
4) Support,
Don’t Punish: Restorative Practices
5) Clean and Healthy Buildings
6) Full
Service Community Schools
7) Quality
Education for All: Inclusion and Equity
8) Invest
in Public Schools
9) $15 an
Hour for All MPS Employees
10) Recess
The last seven points to the MFT negotiating
platform are unobjectionable, calling for humane approaches to student
discipline, proper building maintenance, health and welfare services to students
from struggling families, education delivered equitably to a multi-ethnic student
population, proper funding for programming and staff, including the provision of a $15 minimum age,
and recess time at K-5.
But the second point is highly debatable: Many students in the history of the United
States and in the contemporary world have been excellently educated in large
classes.
And the first and third points contain the jargon
of the education professor, establishing that same sort of screen erected by
the Graff administration, behind which lies little substance as to knowledge-intensive,
skill-replete education, delivered by knowledgeable teachers and measured by
objective assessments.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Thus, do current negotiations between the
administration of MPS Superintendent Ed Graff and the MFT leadership contain
particularistic differences depending on exact position in the hierarchy of the
education establishment. Graff and Davis
Center (MPS central offices, 1250 West Broadway) staff must protect their own
prerogatives and high salaries, and they must be attentive to budgetary
limitations. Teachers are out to secure
their own best advantage as to wages and working conditions.
But philosophically the two sides in the
negotiations are of a single kind. They
have both been trained by those lowest status occupants of the professorial
role on any college or university campus:
the education professor. Bearing
so little of that knowledge possessed by professors of mathematics, biology,
chemistry, physics, history, economics, literature, art and music; the education professor makes a place for
herself or himself by devaluing knowledge impartation and exalting pedagogies
delivered by facilitators rather than true teachers, who somehow are to instill
critical thinking skills and a propensity toward lifelong learning in students
to whom they provide limited knowledge for conducting critical analysis of complex
topics and who depart their classrooms having learned so little.
This is a cruel hoax perpetrated upon our
students by both sides in the current contract negotiations.
The hoax must cease.
We must set about providing our precious
posterity with the knowledge-intensive, skill-replete education toward fulfilment
of the purposes of an excellent education:
to send young people forth to
lives of cultural enrichment, civic preparation, and professional satisfaction.
No comments:
Post a Comment