Nov 7, 2016

The Bureaucratic Bloat in the Department of Teaching and Learning at the Minneapolis Public Schools Saliently Demands a Vote of "No" on the 8 November Referendum

The overstaffed Department of Teaching and Learning at the Minneapolis Public Schools is responsible for curriculum adoption and development, professional development of teachers, online learning, and special programming such as the college preparatory AVID program and initiatives such as Focused Instruction.


This is the largest single department in the central offices (Davis Center, 1250 West Broadway) of the Minneapolis Public Schools: The Department of Teaching and Learning has 52 current staff members, or 9.5% of the total 550 employees at the Davis Center.


The positions given for this department are as follows:


Teaching and Learning Staff Directory 2016-2017


Administrative


1. Macarre Traynham, Director


Office Support


2. Amanda Andrews ITT and Online, Office specialist


3. Jeanne Lacy, Executive Assistant


4. Yana Manalov, Business Services Financial Specialist


AVID


5. Maria Roberts, Program Manager, AVID


6. Christen Lish, AVID Elementary Coordinator


7. Paula Killian, AVID Middle School Coordinator


8. Tommie Casey, AVID High School Coordinator




Elementary Team      


9. Casey Seeley, Director, Elementary Education


10. Janna Toche, Elementary DPF


11. Julie Tangeman, Elementary DPF


12. Sara Naegli, Elementary DPF


13. Sarah Hunter, Elementary DPF




Focused Instruction


14. Tina Platt, Project Manager


15. Jake Hirschman, Curriculum Assets Assistant


16. Nancy Mai, Curriculum Assets Assistant




Instructional Technology Team


17. James Stock, Learning Assistant Administrator DPF


18. Jeff Brazee, Applications Trainer


19. Kevin Keller, Technology Integrationist DPF Material Management Position


20. Terry Dinovo, Materials Coordinator


21. Judy Stack-Nelson, Materials Handler




Online Learning


22. Edith McDonald, Online Art


23. James Carr, Online Physical Education


24. Karen Maverick, Online Special Education


25. Katy Hemmah, Online Program Counselor


26. Kelsey Zogby (Passa), Online Math Telescope


27. Lynn Lurvey, Online English


28. Seth Levitt, Online Math, Elementary


29. Tom VanErp, Online Health


30. Tony Patterson, Online Associate Educator


31. William Holm, Online Math, High School




Science Center    


32. Timothy Lilla, Science Senior Materials Handler


33. Donell Shinder, Science Materials Handler


34. Mark Berg, Science Materials Handler


35. Tara Newhouse, Science Materials Handler of Living Organisms




Secondary Team


36. Naomi Taylor, Director, Secondary Education


37. Chris Wemimont, Secondary Math DPF


38. Colleen Atakpu, Secondary Math DPF


39. Hibaq Mohamed, Secondary ELA/ Reading


40. Jennifer Rose, Secondary Science DPF


41. Katy Stephens, Secondary ELA/ Reading DPF


42. Kleber Ortiz-Sinchi, Secondary Social Studies DPF


43. Samantha Weiman, Associate Educator




Specialists


44. Ashley Crohn, K-12 Library and Information Media DPF


45. Kathy Dunbar, Arts Exploration and Extension Coordinator


46. Nora Schull, K-12 Arts DPF


47. Sara Loch, K-12 Health/ Physical Education




STEM


48. Charley Ellingson, STEM Integrationist


49. Elizabeth Stretch, STEM Integrationist




Talent Development and Advanced Academics


50. Alyssa Pollack, Elementary Talent Development and Advanced Academics DPF


51. Kelly McQuillan, High School Talent Development and Advanced Academics DPF


52. Theresa Campbell, Middle School Talent Development and Advanced Academics DPF




Thus, there are three (3) staff members in office support roles, four (4) connected to the AVID program, six (6) for elementary education (including the staff member designated for “talent development and advanced academics”), ten (10) for secondary education (including the middle school and high school staff members designated for “talent development and advanced academics”), three (3) for Focused Instruction, three (3) for material management, ten (10) for online learning, four (4) designated at the Science Center, four (4) assigned as art, media, and physical education specialists, and two (2) for the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) program.


Too often public bureaucracies take on a corporate world ethos and spawn all sorts of assistants whose functions are extraneous. The office and executive assistant positons in the Department of Teaching and Learning are not necessary; and there are staff members in the MPS Department of Finance who could absorb the functions of the business specialist.


Most positions in the Department of Teaching and Learning should not be necessary if teachers were properly trained in departments, colleges, and schools of education. If K-12 teachers came to their school districts with the kind of knowledge base possessed by college professors, their curriculum would be embedded in their brains and the eighteen (18) elementary and secondary curriculum and instruction staff members would be imminently dispensable--- as indeed they should be now, since they are so ineffective.


Decision-makers at the Minneapolis Public Schools would be much the wiser for putting teachers through a rigorous, knowledge-heavy teacher training program such as I advanced in the September 2014 edition of my Journal of the K-12 Revolution: Essays and Research from Minneapolis, Minnesota--- before staff members officially occupy teacher positions in the classrooms of the Minneapolis Public Schools.


With such well-trained and knowledgeable teachers in all classrooms of the Minneapolis Public Schools, the Department of Teaching and Learning could then be disassembled and revamped as a small group of perhaps ten staff members.


For, indeed, most positions in the Department of Teaching and Learning would also be expendable if teachers were well-trained from the beginning of their employment experience at the Minneapolis Public Schools:


If art, media, physical education, math, science, and technology teachers arrived as genuinely skilled practitioners and scholars, at least six (6) of the above given positions would fade away.


Focused Instruction is a worthy program intended to implement curriculum coherently and consistently by grade level throughout the schools of the district. But Tina Platt does not have the subject area knowledge to direct such a program, and the program has not been effective in the half-decade of its existence. All three (3) staff members assigned to Focused Instruction would be dismissed, to be replaced by professionals of general scholarship and familiar with knowledge-intensive curriculum such as that of E. D. Hirsch’s Core Knowledge Foundation.


Ten instructors for online learning should be examined for efficacy and necessity.


Department of Teaching and Learning Director Macarre Traynham was hired by Chief Academic Officer Susanne Griffin to bring expertise in “culturally responsive curriculum.” A Core Knowledge approach provides extraordinary cultural responsiveness in a meaningful context of knowledge-intensive curriculum across the key subject areas of mathematics, natural science, history, literature, and the fine arts. Traynham has little knowledge of such curriculum, and her own training has been primarily in iterations of those notoriously weak programs overseen by education professors, rather than in the legitimate subject area disciplines. Traynham should be dismissed and her position examined for its necessity and level of remuneration.


Macarre Traynham reports to Chief Academic Officer Susanne Griffin. Ms. Griffin is a compassionate and dedicated educator but, as discussed in other articles on this blog, she has no training in any of the main academic programs that should define a knowledge-intensive curriculum. This absence of scholarly credentials and the wretched academic performance of the Minneapolis Public Schools argue powerfully for the termination of Ms. Griffin as Chief Academic Officer.


The Department of Teaching and Learning saliently represents the bloat and superfluity endemic to the central offices of the Minneapolis Public Schools.


This condition of bulimic bureaucracy with no correlation to the academic progress of our precious young people is a prime reason to vote “No” for the 8 November referendum.

No comments:

Post a Comment