A Note to My Readers >>>>>
Below please read the last of three articles from the Star Tribune that I have posted on this blog over the course of these first three weekdays of the current week.
In reading these articles, please analyze them critically, looking as much as possible for sub-textual content, meaning, and reality that lies below the surface information presented. Please also assess these articles for the quality of writing, the depth of research, and the analytical abilities manifested by the writers of these pieces.
By Thursday (15 March 2018), look for my own assessment of the Star Tribune articles, along the lines that I have asked you to consider.
Please now carefully read this article, an opinion piece written by Peter Hutchinson, published in the Opinion section of the Star Tribune on 2 March 2018 >>>>>
Star Tribune, Quality of Reporting, Assessment #2
Below please read the last of three articles from the Star Tribune that I have posted on this blog over the course of these first three weekdays of the current week.
In reading these articles, please analyze them critically, looking as much as possible for sub-textual content, meaning, and reality that lies below the surface information presented. Please also assess these articles for the quality of writing, the depth of research, and the analytical abilities manifested by the writers of these pieces.
By Thursday (15 March 2018), look for my own assessment of the Star Tribune articles, along the lines that I have asked you to consider.
Please now carefully read this article, an opinion piece written by Peter Hutchinson, published in the Opinion section of the Star Tribune on 2 March 2018 >>>>>
Star Tribune, Quality of Reporting, Assessment #2
From Star Tribune, Opinion Pages, 2 March 2018
“No,
Learning Isn’t Booming. Our Diplomas are
Still a Fraud.”
Peter
Hutchinson
“You
lied to me!”
I
was running for governor in 2006, and this young woman was on my case before I
even got a word out. Once I regained my
composure, I asked her what she meant.
“I
did everything you adults told me to do,” she said. “I went to school every day, did my homework
every day, got good grades. I got a
diploma from a five-star Minnesota high school.
I enrolled in community college.
When I got there, they told me I had to take math and English all over
again because I had not really learned enough in high school. You adults told me that high school
graduation meant that I had learned. But
you lied to me!”
I was stunned, mad, embarrassed. I went to find the facts. In 2006, 28 percent of high school graduates
who went to college in Minnesota (two- or four-year) ended up taking high
school (remedial) classes in college. We
lied to them. We gave them a diploma
that was a fraud.
Now, over 10 years later we read in the Star Tribune that high school graduation
is at an all-time high, according to a new report from the Minnesota Department
of Education (“Graduation rate at high mark, Feb. 28”). The data seem to point in that
direction--- the percentage of students
graduating from high school is up significantly (from 75 percent in 2006 to
over 82 percent in 2016), while the percentage of those going to college
requiring remedial education is down( from 28 percdent in 2016 to 21 percent in
2015).
All true and on the face of it pretty fantastic. The message:
In Minnesota we have done what few other places have done: We have gotten more of our students to
learn--- and to learn at ever-higher
levels. It’s unbelievable!
Indeed, it is not believable. These two measures--- graduation and remedial course-taking--- tell us about events in the experience of
students but not what they learned.
We have three pieces of very reliable data on student learning
that got left out.
First, in elementary and middle school, the National
Assessment of Educational Progress measures the proficiency of our students in
both reading and math. In the last 10
years, there has been no significant improvement in student learning--- with only 40 to 50 percent of our students
being rated as proficient or better.
These are the students enrolling in our high schools.
Second, the ACT measures the degree to which our high
school graduates are ready for college. Over the last 10 years, the average score has
remained virtually unchanged--- with
only 30 percent of students meeting all of the ACT’s benchmarks for college
readiness. Nevertheless we graduate over
80 percent of students from high school, and the vast majority of them (75
percent) go on to college--- and
especially to our two-year colleges, where about one-third of them enroll.
So then what happens?
The Department of Education argues that the reduction in remedial
course-taking means that our students are better prepared. The data on student achievement in elementary,
middle, and high school say otherwise.
And so do the outcomes for college students.
Over 80 percent of all remedial course-taking is done by
students enrolled in our two-year colleges.
For them, it is accurate to say that remedial course-taking has
dropped. But that is largely because our
two-year colleges have redefined and redesigned how to support underprepared
students, steering them away from old-style remedial classes.
What’s more important is that the percentage of students
successfully graduating from our two-year institutions has dropped--- only 49 percent now get a degree and transfer
to another college.
Yes, we are graduating more students from high school,
and enrolling more in college, and then we are letting them flounder and leave
without getting a degree. That is a
scandal.
We should put a warning label on our high school
diplomas saying: “This is not a
certification that you are ready for college.”
Our system is failing students by lying to them. Reports and stories like these only
perpetuate the lie and keep the rest of us in the dark.
And in the dark, things look a lot better than they
really are.
No comments:
Post a Comment