Jul 30, 2017

Major Themes Emerging in My Nearly Complete New Book, >Understanding the Minneapolis Public Schools: Current Condition, Future Prospect<

At the 8 August meeting of the Minneapolis Public Schools Board of Education, Chief of Research, Evaluation, and Accountability Eric Moore will present data pertinent to Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments (MCAs), Multiple Measurement Rating System (MMRS), and ACT results for academic year 2016-2017 that will constitute yet another damning indictment of MPS decision-makers for their inability to construct and deliver an academic program that can impart basic skills to students, let alone deliver a knowledge-intensive education of excellence.

 

I know that results will yet again be abhorrent because I listen closely to my students in the New Salem Educational Initiative, go into schools often, and follow MPS events more closely than anyone.  The composite picture that appears on my mental screen very clearly reveals an approach to education and a level of organizational ineptitude that cannot produce any appreciable change for the better.

 

I will put Dr. Moore’s 8 August report together with the mass of data that I have accumulated to yield a book (Understanding the Minneapolis Public Schools:  Current Condition, Future Prospect) that will stress these themes:

 

>>>>>    There is nothing at the Minneapolis Public Schools remotely resembling professional staff of the kind that we associate with business and the professions;  all personnel, including teachers, principals, and central office administrators have been permanently damaged by the degraded educational philosophy of education and low level of teacher/ administrator training inflicted on the education establishment by professors of education.   

 

>>>>>    Decision-makers at the Minneapolis Public Schools are not equipped to design an academic program that imparts sequential skill and knowledge sets capable of improving MCA, MMRS, and ACT results, much less give students solid grounding in mathematics, natural science, history, economics, literature, fine arts;  or the technological and vocational arts.

 

>>>>>    Accordingly, seventy percent of students enrolled in the Minneapolis Public Schools are not performing academically at grade level;  only sixty-two percent of students graduate;  one-third of those students who do graduate need remedial instruction in mathematics and reading once landing on a college campus;  and those who trek across the stage at graduation claim a piece of paper that is a degree in name only.

 

>>>>>    Graduates typically have little understanding of history and current issues pertinent to a range of domestic and international issues;  cannot identify the 1600s as the 17th rather than the 16th century;  have no understanding of the multiple meanings of terms such as conservative, liberal, socialist, communist, revolutionary, radical, reactionary, fiscal, monetary;  cannot identify the essential differences in the ideas of Isaac Newton or Albert Einstein;  have no idea of the approaches to psychology offered by Sigmund Freud, B. F. Skinner, or Abraham Maslow;  could not give an account of major genres of music with salient examples of musicians, whether classical, blues, jazz, or the multiple forms to which the latter two gave rise;  cannot describe how the electoral college works or the function and composition of the United States Supreme Court;  cannot differentiate the roles of the United States Senate and House of Representatives or convey any information as to the day-to-day functioning of those two bodies;  have no idea as to the defining qualities of major categories of art, whether in the United States or in the traditions and nations of Europe, Africa, Asia, or Latin America;  manifest the ability consistently to perform operations pertinent either to basic fractions, decimals, and percentages or those relevant to algebra or geometry---  much less trigonometry or calculus.

 

>>>>>    Although the Minneapolis Public Schools does have certain caring and capable individuals such as Chief of Academics, Leadership, and Learning Michael Thomas;  Chief of Research, Evaluation, and Accountability Eric Moore;  and Associate Superintendent Ron Wagner;  in-house training of teachers and administrators is woefully inadequate and the staff as a whole is not remotely equal to the tasks set before them.

 

>>>>>    Chief Financial Officer Ibrahima Diop is enormously capable, but he is routinely handed a budget that is ill-designed to deliver an academic program of excellence:  Financial resources are with irresponsible regularity wasted that should be directed toward the most important academic concerns of students.

 

>>>>>    There is a middle class viewpoint that dominates MPS decision-makers and school board members the falls far short of understanding programmatic imperatives for students from families facing challenges of economy and functionality.

 

>>>>>    The Department of College and Career Readiness, Office of Black Male Achievement, and Department of Indian Education are not capable of fulfilling their most important academic imperatives.

 

>>>>>    There is a murkiness in the authority structure at the Minneapolis Public Schools that results in the imprecise location of decision-making in some netherworld between superintendent (currently Ed Graff) and MPS Board of Education members Rebecca Gagnon, Kim Ellison, Jenny Arneson, KerryJo Felder, Bob Walser, Siad Ali, Nelson Inz, Don Samuels, and Ira Jourdain.

 

>>>>>    The current membership of the school board is not capable of making decisions impelling the academic program forward:  KerryJo Felder is refreshingly irascible but errant of aim;  Bob Felser is a silly and irritating distraction;  Rebecca Gagnon, Kim Ellison, and Nelson Inz are politically conniving;  all members aside from Don Samuels are deeply connected to the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers;  and Samuels is bombastically ineffective.

 

>>>>>    Superintendent Ed Graff came to MPS with an undistinguished record from the public schools of Anchorage, Alaska, the board members of which did not renew Graff’s contract after three years;  the latter left the district rife with the same essential failures as those of the Minneapolis Public Schools; and while he has made some favorable moves in reducing the central bureaucracy, he shows little promise for the design and implementation of an academic program of excellence or instituting proper supports for struggling students.   

 

……………………………………………………………………….

 

Understanding the Minneapolis Public Schools:  Current Condition, Future Prospect will proceed in three parts:

 

Part One:  Facts

 

Part Two:  Analysis

 

Part Three:  Philosophy

 

In Part One staff and school board members will damn themselves on the basis of objective data.

 

In Part Two I will analyze the precise problems that suffuse the district.

 

In Part Three I will detail the philosophy and program that must undergird the needed overhaul.

 

Understanding the Minneapolis Public Schools:  Current Condition, Future Prospect will shake MPS staff and school board members to their core and confront the public with the facts.

 

Then the remaining questions will be:

 

Does anyone really care about public education?

 

Does anyone, pretensions and attestations aside, care about making of ourselves the democracy that we imagine ourselves to be?   

No comments:

Post a Comment