The announcement by the Minneapolis Public Schools Board of Education yesterday (Thursday, 5 May 2022) that the district is forwarding a tentative appointment of Rochelle Cox as MPS Interim Superintendent for a formal vote at the next regular board meeting, on Tuesday, 10 May, is a very favorable development.
Rochelle Cox is one of
those few capable staff members at the Minneapolis Public Schools with a
connection to the Academic Division. As
a rule, the Academic Division, led by Senior Academic Officer Aimee Fearing, is an
ironic disaster, given that the provision of the academic program is the chief
function of any locally centralized school district; departments under Fearing’s oversight prominently
include the Department of Teaching and Learning, Office of Black Student Achievement,
and Department of Indian Education---
all of which are ineffective in the extreme.
But in her leadership
positions in special education, Cox endeavored to challenge the students under
her purview to achieve as much as they could academically, and she was a solid advocate
for knowledge-intensive, skill-replete education. She is now in a position to advocate for academically
substantive education throughout the Minneapolis Public Schools--- in her position as Interim Superintendent and
in overseeing the process whereby a supporter of knowledge-focused education
and high teacher quality is selected as long-term superintendent.
Cox is in her twenty-fifth year at the district, beginning as a member of the early childhood special education department, going on to serve as MPS Special Education and Health Executive Director, then becoming a member of Superintendent Ed Graff’s cabinet as Associate Superintendent of Special Education and Health; most recently, Cox became Associate Superintendent with responsibility for mentoring principals and overseeing academic progress at nineteen different schools, as indicated below >>>>>
>>>>>
Associate
Superintendent, PK-8
Rochelle Cox
612.668.0140
Fax:
612.668.0145
Schools
Assigned: Armatage, Bancroft, Barton, Cityview, Dowling, Emerson, Folwell,
Hiawatha, Hmong Academy, Howe, Lake Harriet Lower, Lake Harriet Upper, Marcy,
Metro Programs*, Pillsbury, Riverbend*, Seward, Sheridan, Webster, Whittier,
Windom
Associate Superintendent, MS/Contract Alt.
<<<<<
Now understand the opportunity afforded by Ed Graff’s resignation, Rochelle Cox’s appointment, and the process that must now ensue in the search for a new superintendent.
>>>>>
Seizing the Unprecedented Opportunity Presented in the Selection
of a New Superintendent of the Minneapolis Public Schools
Ed Graff’s resignation
as Superintendent of the Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) presents an unprecedented
opportunity to overhaul curriculum and teacher quality at a locally centralized
school district that can serve as model for other districts throughout the
nation.
To achieve the needed
overhaul we must move logically from a vision of excellence in education,
toward the succession of steps that must be taken as the search process
ensues. Accordingly, the categorical
considerations are as follows:
Understanding
the Meaning of Excellent Education
Excellent education is
a matter of excellent teachers imparting a knowledge-intensive, skill-replete,
logically sequenced curriculum in the liberal, technological, and vocational
arts to students of all demographic descriptors throughout the preK-12 years.
An excellent teacher
is a professional academician of deep and broad knowledge with the pedagogical
ability to impart a knowledge-intensive, skill-replete, logically sequenced
curriculum in the liberal, technological, and vocational arts to students of
all demographic descriptors.
Understanding
the Needed Qualities in a Superintendent--- and in the Senior Academic Officer
Because certain
certifications and licensures are required by the state of Minnesota for the
position of superintendent, and because institutional credits leading to those
certifications and licensures must be acquired through matriculation in
academically insubstantial programs taught by education professors who are not
subject area specialists, any candidate for superintendent will be
unsatisfactory.
The challenge, then,
will be to select the least objectionable candidate for Superintendent of the
Minneapolis Public Schools.
The position would
ideally be occupied by a scholar in a key academic area, but given the formal
requirements set by the education establishment, the chance of getting such a
scholar is slim in the extreme. The next
best alternative, therefore, is to select a superintendent who is atypically
receptive to the momentous changes needed for instituting knowledge-intensive,
skill-replete, logically sequenced curriculum and training the teachers needed
to impart such a curriculum.
Since a superintendent
possessing education establishment credentials will almost certainly not
possess the scholarly credentials necessary to oversee the needed overhaul, a
new senior academic officer will be needed.
A senior academic officer does not need any administrative
certifications and can thus be a university-based or independent scholar
possessing a Ph.D. in a key subject area.
These two elements of
the superintendent search, then are critical to the needed overhaul for the
attainment of academic excellence:
>>>>> selecting a superintendent willing to take
the steps necessary to achieve the needed overhaul in curriculum and teacher
quality, including;
>>>>>
bringing on staff a scholar possessing a Ph.D. in a key subject area
(mathematics, biology, chemistry, physics, history, political science,
economics, English or world literature) to serve as senior academic officer.
The
Need for an Unconventional Superintendent Search
The Minneapolis Public
Schools Board of Education is likely to turn to an expensive search firm in
seeking candidates. This is a waste of
money. Such firms can never find suitable
candidates, because they focus on those with the formalistic but unsatisfactory
credentials put in place by the education establishment. There are at least two staff members at the
Davis Center (MPS central offices, 1250 West Broadway) who have the formal
credentials but who would be willing to seek the necessary senior academic
officer for overseeing the requisite overhaul in curriculum and teacher
quality.
Ideally, the MPS Board
of Education would decide not to hire a professional research firm but, rather,
select from the in-house candidates, in consultation with the MPS Department of
Human Resources.
The Board may not have
the courage to bypass the engagement of the conventional search firm, though,
opting for reasons of public posture to hire such a firm.
In that case, enormous
activist pressure will need to be exerted on the firm and the board to select a
superintendent with the inclinations stipulated above, including the
willingness to engage the services of a scholarly senior academic officer.
The
Need for Fierce Resolve in Bucking the Enormous Opposition that Will Ensue from
the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers and Many Central Office Staff Members
with Vested Interests in the Existing System
The steps recommended
above for the superintendent search will engender fierce opposition from the
Minneapolis Federation of Teachers (MFT) and from many MPS central office staff
members. Further, for reasons that will
be detailed in subsequent articles, the specific changes needed to implement
the overhauled program designed by the new senior academic officer will also be
vehemently opposed by the MFT and others with vested interests in the current
system.
As the overhaul ensues
and the new program for knowledge-intensive curriculum and excellent teacher
quality is moving toward implementation, the Department of Teaching and
Learning and the ineffective Office of Black Student Achievement will be
jettisoned and staff members of the legislatively mandated Department of Indian
Education will be replaced with academicians dedicated to the impartation of
academically substantive education to Native American students. Those staff members affected by these moves
will rise in heated oppositions, as will many in the leadership and rank and
file of the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers.
Community activists will
need to be vigilant in their insistence on the needed transformation, willing
to meet the opposition of those with vested interests with superior energy and
commitment.
Other
Considerations
Considerations
for the New Superintendent and Senior Academic Officer
In achieving the
transformation indicated above, the new superintendent and senior academic
officer will need to make certain other initiatives in support of the
overhauled curriculum and teacher quality.
At the preK-5 level, an
hour a day should be devoted to academic enrichment, giving those few students
operating at grade level the opportunity to explore driving interests--- and those in the majority functioning below
grade level the opportunity to acquire grade-level skills in mathematics and
reading. Similar opportunities and
assistance should be provided to students in grades 6-8 and 9-12 to ensure that
all students are prepared to benefit from the new academically substantive
curriculum.
Great thoughtfulness
should be applied to administrative reorganizations at the Davis Center. Those now serving in positions as senior
finance, operations, and information technology officers are highly adroit at
their positions; and many others outside
the academic division are quite competent.
But, with newly retrained principals and teachers obviating the excuse
for many existing positions, academic division staff should be mostly
dismissed, along with the position of associate superintendent.
And, though the
overwhelming inclination should be toward bureaucratic diminution, one new
department, a Department of Resource Provision and Referral should be
established, staffed with those comfortable on the streets and in the homes of
students from families struggling with issues of finances and functionality.
Considerations
for the Public
To seize the opportunity
afforded by Ed Graff’s resignation and move forward along the course indicated
above, the public will have to become informed and engaged.
An activist contingent
will need to embrace and agitate for the overhaul indicated above.
And the activist members
of the public will need to be aware of looming important decisions by the MPS
Board of Education.
At the Tuesday, 10 May, regular
meeting of the MPS Board of Education, members will also
>>>>> explain
the 12-to-15 month-long process by which a new superintendent will be selected;
and
>>>>> vote, supposedly after discussion among all
board members of applications, for the at-large board position from which Josh
Pauly resigned, on the candidate put forward to fill that position.
The current board
consists of
>>> District members Nelson Inz (District 5),
Kim Caprini (at-large), Jenny Arneson (District 1), and board chair Kim Ellison
(at-large), who as a group are resistant to change, heavily connected to the
MFT, and concerned primarily with controlling board decisions for maintenance
of the current system; all of their
manipulations should regarded as suspect;
>>> District members Adriana Cerrillo and
Sharon El-Amin, who are independent voices inclined toward the existing
system; their actions and comments
should be taken with utmost seriousness;
>>> District members Siad Ali (District 3) and
Ira Jourdain (District 6), who may be ready to move toward the positions of
Cerrillo and El-Amin.
Thus, the selection of a
board member to replace Josh Paul is highly important, inasmuch as the current
board can be regarded as consisting potentially of a 4-4 alignment that could
move either way, according the stance of the new member.
Be attentive to all of
my comments along the way as we seek to bring knowledge-intensive,
skill-replete, logically sequenced curriculum and elevated teacher quality to
the long-suffering students of the Minneapolis Public Schools.
Fantastic article! Thank you!
ReplyDeleteLocal Citation Sites List Usa