Oct 23, 2019

Irony, Deceit, and Ignorance Abide at 22 October Meeting of the MPS Committee of the Whole in Demonstration of Massive Academic Division and Board of Education Incompetence

Last evening (Tuesday, 22 October 2019) at 6:45 PM I was working with a student of mine in the Tuesday program of the New Salem Educational Initiative, a grade 6 student who could be attending the Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) but, exercising an option similar to those decisions made by so many others, is attending Harvest Preparatory Academy.  She had high-quality mathematics homework focused on order of operations;  she needed a few guiding comments from me but ultimately used the PEMDAS code with pre-algebraic alacrity that escapes most students who come to me from the Minneapolis Public Schools.



 

Reluctantly but dutifully, I asked one of my tutors to take my place with this student and dragged myself over to the meeting of the MPS Board of Education Committee of the Whole, at which Chief of Research, Evaluation, and Accountability Eric Moore gave his annual report of dismal academic results at the Minneapolis Public Schools.  So sloppily was the draft for “Committee of the Whole Academic Report” proofread that the identifying day of the week and date were given as Thursday, October 22, 2019---  the correct date but missing the day of the week by two.

 

The document is a part fact, part propaganda rendering of the current academic morass of the district and what purports to be the solution.  The solution focuses on Superintendent Ed Graff’s four-point program of Social and Emotional Learning, Multi-Tiered System of Support, Literacy,  and Equity---  which is not sufficient to address the grave knowledge and skill deficits of the students of the Minneapolis Public Schools.  There is a vow to carry forth with intensive Professional Development work, with great emphasis on cultural competence and differentiation according to student need, in the context of the four-point program.  But cultural competence is a hard trait to teach, and as deficient in such as are the teachers of the Minneapolis Public Schools, their even greater deficiency is in the knowledge and skill with which they themselves emerge from woeful teacher training programs.

 

The document is replete with yet another round of deceitful vows, fronted by a “Call to Uncommon Courage,” followed by a quotation from T. S. Eliot: 

 

Only those who will risk going too far

can possibly find how far they can go.

 

The claim of courage and risk-taking propensity from the moral cowards leading the Minneapolis Public Schools is tragi-comic:

 

Actual moral courage would find academicians and board members committing themselves to knowledge-intensive, skill-replete curricular overhaul and teacher training that would find preK-5 (elementary) students actually studying history, natural science, fine arts, and quality literature;  completely reworking the current grade 6-8 curriculum to extend knowledge of those subjects and provide language and vocational training options;  and proceeding in logical sequence to a transformed high school (grades 9-12) curriculum that would now offer academic and vocational options reminiscent of the first two years at colleges and universities.

 

But the courage and ability to design and implement knowledge-intensive curriculum at the Minneapolis Public Schools is lacking:

 

There are no academicians at the Davis Center (MPS central offices, 1250 West Broadway):

 

Superintendent Ed Graff is an able slimmer of the central office bureaucracy and custodian of finances.

 

But

 

>>>>>    Graff is an academic lightweight who has topped out with an online masters of education administration degree from low-tier University of Southern Mississippi. 

 

>>>>>    New Department of Teaching and Learning Executive Director Aimee Fearing’s degrees are in education programs;  she has no expertise in any specific academic field.  Staff at the Department of Teaching and Learning also are devoid of qualifications as scholars.

 

>>>>>    Eric Moore is well-trained in data collection and assessment but has been unsuccessful as an academic decision-maker.

 

Thus, what the Committee of the Whole (COW) Academic Data Report offers as the new “Academic Plan” for the Minneapolis Public Schools relies heavily on generalities from the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), World’s Best Workforce (WBWF) Minnesota legislative regulations, Graff’s four-point program, and values expressed by the MPS Board of Education that have been incorporated into the MPS Comprehensive District Design (the latter still in formulation pending further public vetting).    

 

But, in order,

 

>>>>>    staff at the Minneapolis Public Schools do not grasp the meaning of the ESSA definition of a well-rounded education and have no ability to provide such if they did; 

 

>>>>>    enforcement of WBWF falls to the hapless staff at the Minnesota Department of Education and that department’s understaffed, comically named Regional Centers of Excellence; 

 

>>>>>    Graff’s program is inefficacious in the extreme;  and

 

>>>>>    the academic program portion of the most current draft of the MPS Comprehensive District Design presents the same jargon-infested proclamations pervading the COW Academic Data Report.

 

……………………………………………………………………………………………

 

There is an abiding assumption in the new academic plan that once cultural relevance in coursework is attained, African American, Hispanic, Hmong, American Indian, and Somali students will be on their way to better performance;  and that enhanced social and emotional sensitivity will promote those relationships among teachers and students conducive to effective delivery of culturally relevant curriculum.

 

Two comments by MPS Board of Education members exposed the problematic nature of reliance on such assumptions:

 

>>>>>    District 1 (Northeast Minneapolis) representative Jenny Arneson cited a conversation that she had had with a student who advocated for ethnic studies courses over a reported rehash of United States history already taken in grade seven.  But MPS students learn very little United States history unless they take Advanced Placement courses in high school;  whether at grade 7 or at high school, given the propensity of teachers to rely on worksheet packets and videos in the absence of class discussion and teacher-imparted knowledge sets leaves students devoid of historical knowledge.  Arneson’s assumption that a high school student is repeating at the high school level what has already been learned at grade 7 is possibly rooted in denial or dishonesty but most likely is grounded in her failure to understand classroom teacher incompetence, despite Arneson’s children having matriculated in the Minneapolis Public Schools.

 

>>>>>    At-large representative Kim Ellison cited her experience as a teacher at the alternative school of Plymouth Youth Center (PYC) (formerly Plymouth Christian Youth Center [PCYC]) as a model for the Minneapolis Public Schools.  She cited success in teacher-student relationship building but failed to mention that fewer than twenty percent (20) of students at PYC now or when she was a teacher at that institution demonstrate or demonstrated grade level academic ability.

 

……………………………………………………………………………………………

 

Two moments must suffice for any evidence of discernment at the woeful affair that was the COW meeting on Tuesday 22 October.

 

>>>>>    Student Representative Janaan Ahmed commented that she is a keen advocate for ethnic studies but wanted to see a more complete version of history conveyed in mainline United States and world history courses, rather than for the curriculum to rely on ethnic studies courses in high school to impart the pertinent information.

 

>>>>>    At-large representative Josh Pauly noted the Eliot quote, said that we have heard vows courageously to forge our way to better academic results before, but wondered what is really in the new plan to give us hope.

 

To the Pauly comment, Fearing and Moore gave the usual jargon-infested double-talk that confirmed Pauly’s skepticism rather than answered his question.

 

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

 

Massive incompetence characterizes academic decision-makers and board members of the Minneapolis Public Schools.

 

As we endeavor to overhaul curriculum and train teachers of excellence in the courageous steps actually needed for the achievement of academic excellence, we must show these prevaricating, ignorant actors their way out the Davis Center door.  

No comments:

Post a Comment