Mar 27, 2017

Additional Data >>>>> Abysmal Results for MPS Superintendent Ed Graff’s “Social and Emotional Learning” Strategy As Revealed in Achievement Levels during His Tenure in Anchorage, Alaska

In this article, I give data additional to that given in a similar article, now including results for all high school students and all grade 10 students pertinent to achievement levels in mathematics and English/ language arts during current Minneapolis Public Schools Superintendent Ed Graff’s tenure as superintendent in Anchorage, Alaska.  I also give figures pertinent to the achievement gap between students of color and White/ Caucasian students.  And I repeat the presentation of data pertinent to achievement levels for all students in mathematics and English/ language arts.

 

Given Minneapolis Public Schools Superintendent Ed Graff’s emphasis on “Social and Emotional Learning,” his record in promoting this pedagogical approach during his tenure as superintendent at Anchorage, Alaska, should be examined.  Mr. Graff won the Exemplary Social and Emotional Leadership  Award from CASEL (Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning) in 2016.

 

Mr. Graff’s award was so impressive to school board members in Anchorage that they declined to renew his contract at the end of that very year of 2016 when he won the CASEL award.  Graff served as superintendent in Anchorage for three academic years:  2013-2014, 2014-2015, and 2015-2016.  The most recent figures available to me are for academic year 2014-2015, the second of the three academic years for which Graff served as superintendent.

 

A look at those figures strongly suggests why Graff’s contract was not renewed, and the reason why the school board was less than impressed with the Social and Emotional Learning strategy as utilized by Graff:  

 

Results for Academic Year 2014-2015

 

       All Grade Levels

 

                                                              Language Arts

 
                        Does Not        Partially Meets    Meets            Exceeds
                        Meet               Meets                     Standard      Standard
                        Standard        Standard

 

Student

Categories

 

African                 35.1%                    42.1%                          20.5%                  2.3%

American

 

White/                 13.3%                    33.7%                          44.3%                  8.5%

Caucasian

 

Hispanic               28.3%                    42.3%                          26.9%                  2.5%

 

 

Alaska                   42.4%                    37.5%                           18.1%                 1.9%

Native

American/

American

Indian

 

            All Grade Levels

 

                                                       Mathematics

 
                        Does Not          Partially Meets        Meets            Exceeds
                        Meet                 Meets                         Standard      Standard
                        Standard          Standard

 

Student

Categories

 

African                 29.5%                   51.3.%                        16.9%                  2.3%

American

 

White/                 12.9%                    39.7%                          36.5%                  10.9%

Caucasian

 

Hispanic               23.4%                    50.9%                          21.8%                  3.9%

 

 

Alaska                   29.0%                    50.3%                           18.2%                 2.5%

Native

American/

American

Indian

 

                  All High School Mathematics Students

 

                                                                Mathematics

 

Does Not          Partially Meets       Meets           Exceeds

Meet                 Meets                        Standard      Standard

Standard          Standard

 

Student

Categories

 

African                 48.6%                   36.7%                          13.5%                 1.2%

American

 

White/                 26.5%                    35.4%                          31.3%                   6.8%

Caucasian

 

Hispanic               47.8%                    35.4%                          15.2%                  1.6%

 

 

Alaska                   46.0%                    35.4%                           17.5%                 1.0%

Native

American/

American

Indian

 

 

              Grade 10

 

                                                                Mathematics

 

Does Not          Partially Meets       Meets              Exceeds

Meet                 Meets                        Standard         Standard

Standard          Standard

 

Student

Categories

 

African                 69.5%                   24.7%                           ---------            ---------

American

 

 

White/                 36.9%                   30.6%                          25.6%                  6.9%

Caucasian

 

Hispanic               61.3%                   23.2%                          14.4%                  1.1%

 

 

Alaska                   69.4%                    24.5%                         ---------              ---------

Native

American/

American

Indian

 

All                          48.7%                   27.9%                          19.4%                  3.9%

Students

 

 

           Grade 10

 

                                                     English/ Language Arts

 

Does Not          Partially Meets       Meets            Exceeds

Meet                 Meets                        Standard      Standard

Standard          Standard

 

Student

Categories

 

African                 35.9%                   53.3%                           ---------            ---------

American

 

 

White/                 12.5%                   44.7%                          39.7%                  3.1%

Caucasian

 

Hispanic               28.6%                   50.5%                          ---------            ---------

 

 

Alaska                   47.3%                    40.5%                           ---------            ---------

Native

American/

American

Indian

 

All                          23.9%                   46.6%                          27.7%                  1.8%

Students

  

                                        Composite Achievement Gaps (All Grade Levels) 

 

                English/Language Arts                   Mathematics

 

Student

Categories

 

African                                              30.0%                                           28.2%

American                                                                                                 

vs.

White/ Caucasian                           

 

Alaska                                                32.8%                                           26.7%

Native

American/

vs.

White/ Caucasian

 

Asian                                                  22.4%                                          12.5%

vs.

White/ Caucasian

 

Native Hawaiian/                            40.2%                                        32.5%

Other Pacific Island

vs.

White/ Caucasian

 

Hispanic                                             23.4%                                        21.7%

American

vs.

White/ Caucasian

 

Two or More                                    15.9%                                       13.7%

Ethnicities

vs.

White/ Caucasian

 

These are abysmal results, actually worse than those that I have posted on this blog many times for the Minneapolis Public Schools.

 

Reference to those figures shows that fewer than 27% of African American, American Indian, or Hispanic students showed proficiency in mathematics and reading, and that the given figures holds for Hispanic reading levels;  for mathematics, the percentage of Hispanics demonstrating proficiency is a bit higher but still under 34%.  Proficiency figures for White/ Caucasian students in the Minneapolis Public Schools during academic year 2014-2015 were just under 78% for mathematics and 81% for reading.  

 

Hence, an examination of the objective academic results in Anchorage, Alaska, during the tenure of Ed Graff as superintendent indicates that students in that school district were worse than those for students in the Minneapolis Pubic Schools.

 

What, then, emboldens Graff to pursue in the Minneapolis context the Social and Emotional Learning Strategy that failed in Anchorage?

 

What justifies leading the members of the Minneapolis Public Schools Board of Education on a trip to Chicago to receive the wisdom of Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL), the organization that granted him an award during the very year that the Anchorage school board declined to renew his contract?

 

An examination of the objective data given above strongly suggests that endeavoring to instill self-confidence and social skills in young people, while clearly worthy , is not a strategy for academic achievement.

 

Graff and Minneapolis school board members might do penance for that wasteful meeting in Chicago by initiating a program for basic skills acquisition, knowledge-intensive curriculum, and teachers trained to impart such skills and knowledge sets---  along with a family outreach program capable of ensuring that precious young lives of all demographic descriptors can benefit.

No comments:

Post a Comment