Grasp these
critical facts:
>>>>> Outlays for
staff salaries at the Davis Center have risen a total of $5,961,516 during
autumn 2015 until the present juncture in spring 2017
>>>>> To deal with
the current $28 million deficit facing the school district, MPS officials are
proposing 10% reduction in central office expenditures. A cut of 10% from the current $43,324,790 yields
$4,332,279 worth of cuts.
>>>>> Thus, the
proposed cuts fall far short of the figure representing the rise in expenditures
for staff salaries over an approximately 17-month period. Even after the proposed cuts are made, there
will still have been an increase of $1,629,234 from autumn 2015 to the present juncture
in spring 2017.
This continuing
bureaucratic bloat is further evidence of either incompetence or deception
in the use of public dollars by officials at the Minneapolis Public Schools, with grave implications for the lives of our
children: The rise in outlays for the
central MPS bureaucracy has occurred during a period in which student academic
performance has remained essentially flat and has actually evidenced
declines for some demographic groups.
All of this
is very disappointing, given the much ballyhooed 16% in central office staffing
cuts that occurred under the leadership of Michael Goar, who served as interim
superintendent from February 2015 until May 2016.
Since the figures show a rise during the autumn 2015 to spring 2017 period, this means that the additional spending was ostensibly the result of policy decisions that began during Goar’s tenure and have continued during the first seven months of Ed Graff’s period as superintendent. Any hope that Goar’s bureaucratic paring represented a genuine effort to reduce either staffing or expenditures at the Davis Center has proven a chimera of the kind all too familiar to this longtime follower of the budgetary escapades of administrations at the level of the locally centralized school district.
Since the figures show a rise during the autumn 2015 to spring 2017 period, this means that the additional spending was ostensibly the result of policy decisions that began during Goar’s tenure and have continued during the first seven months of Ed Graff’s period as superintendent. Any hope that Goar’s bureaucratic paring represented a genuine effort to reduce either staffing or expenditures at the Davis Center has proven a chimera of the kind all too familiar to this longtime follower of the budgetary escapades of administrations at the level of the locally centralized school district.
The
situation described herein would mean that in a moral universe, officials at the
Minneapolis Public Schools should reconfigure their cuts to fall entirely on
the Davis Center, with any effort then to design a structurally balanced budget
necessitating drawing from the reserve fund, as presently proposed.
Central office
bloat at the Minneapolis Public Schools is evident.
Such bloat
is immoral at a time when we actually need to inaugurate a well-articulated and
cohesive tutoring program for students lagging below grade level and to expand greatly outreach programming to families struggling with dilemmas of poverty and
dysfunction.
Officials at
the Minneapolis Public Schools currently operate outside a moral universe.
Our duty as
citizens is first to situate ourselves in that moral universe and then do
everything in our power to draw central office bureaucrats into that ethical
realm.
No comments:
Post a Comment