Jun 30, 2021

The Most Anti-Education Groups in Minnesota >>>>> Creatures of the Education Establishment

June 30, 2021 


Reply to an inquirer---

 

I hope that this note finds you well, that those in your personal universe are fully vaccinated, and that you are poised to enjoy a careful but perhaps more relaxed summer 2021 than was 2020.

 

…………………………………………………………………………………….

 

The questions that you posed to me a few days back are interesting  >>>>>

 

>>>>>     Who are the most anti-education groups and state legislators in Minnesota?

 

>>>>>     What are your thoughts on the current budget debate?

 

I take such questions very seriously, considering them upon the basis of which they were posed, and from my vantage point as one who has researched K-12 education more thoroughly than anyone of whom I am aware, conceptualizing the issues very differently from the conventional formulation.

 

I will, then, comment upon the questions first from the standpoint of what is truly important and then according to what I perceive to be the spirit in which you made the inquiry  >>>>>

 

………………………………………………………………………………..

 

My Answers Based on The Actual Dilemmas of K-12 Education

 

>>>>>     Who are the most anti-education groups and state legislators in Minnesota?

 

College and university based education professors are the most anti-education presences on the scene.  All of the most vexing issues pertinent to K-12 education are traceable to these lightly regarded campus gadflies who embrace an anti-knowledge creed and preside over academically insubstantial teacher training programs, the creed of which is derived from Teachers College of Columbia University during the 1920s.

 

Next come the administrators and teachers whom education professors train, those central office and site-based putative educators who provide such little education that the great bulk of graduates stride across the stage to claim a piece of paper that is a diploma in name only.

 

Then we have board members such as those of the the Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) Board of Education, most of whom are sycophants of local unions such as the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers (MFT).

The MFT itself comes next, protecting as it does many teachers who are incompetent and should have departed teaching a long time ago.

 

And then among the worst of the remaining greatest offenders are those who are or have been in a position to advocate for change but do not do so, either while they have their position or after they have departed.  This includes all former MPS Board of Education members, reporters for the Star Tribune, and DFL legislators who are bought and paid for by the unions.  And it includes high-profile public figures who have misrepresented themselves as education advocates, including R. T. Rybak, Don Samuels, former Minneapolis Foundation President/CEO Sandy Vargas, and all past governors, both Republican and Democrat.

 

Further, local districts and staff operate in an intellectually corrupt cast of characters and policies at the national and state levels:  this includes Miguel Cardona at the U. S. Department of Education;  and Heather Mueller at the Minnesota Department of Education (MDE);  the MDE is an abomination (check out, for example, my articles on the North Star Accountability System and the preposterously named Regional Centers of Excellence (RCEs).

 

 

>>>>>     What are your thoughts in the current budget debate?

 

There are many budget debates, none of which end very happily for students in the classrooms of Minnesota.  Republicans and Democrats are both culpable, but not for the reasons usually cited.  Year after year, budgets provided vehemently debated funding but with no structural changes necessary to construct knowledge-intensive, skill-replete curriculum imparted by teachers knowledgeable to impart such a curriculum.

 

Special education and English Language Learners (ELL) constitute categories for which funding is

inadequate;  but per pupil allotments and other general student population categories receive adequate funding.  Funding is actually generous for students on free/reduced price lunch;  impoverished students are hurt the worst by the failure of those in many quarters to advocate for and implement the needed structural changes pertinent to curriculum and teacher quality.

 

At MPS, Senior Financial Officer (SFO) Ibrahima Diop is one of the three best at his position in the nation.  Do not worry about MPS finances with him as leader:   Budgets are structurally balanced and the reserve fund is being rebuilt after years of irresponsible SFO predecessors.

 

 

My Answers Based on More Conventional Assumptions

 

>>>>>     What are the most anti-education groups and state legislators in Minnesota?

 

There are those who would like to see public education become privatized.  To identify these, look for advocates of vouchers and even many of those who take public funding for launching charter schools but really have little interest in advocating for the general student population and who start and operate such schools for pecuniary reasons.

 

Republican legislators are the most likely to favor privatization and the many varieties of “school choice”;  they also espouse local control and family options in their guise as defenders of freedom and liberty.

 

In conventional terms, these are the most anti-education groups---  but I return you to the more serious culprits detailed under my first bold heading.

 

>>>>>     What are your thoughts in the current budget debate?

 

Republicans are not as generous at budget formulation time as are Democrats.  They have been less enthusiastic about early childhood education, tending to think that is a familial, by which in sexist terms they mean a motherly, matter.

 

At the state level, Governor Walz seems likely to prevail with his generous education funding proposal, and COVID funding from the federal government has been a windfall.

 

The current debate over private fundraising efforts at schools in poorer versus affluent communities is a distraction from the main issues of curriculum and teacher quality.  There are inequities, but the real issues are insubstantial curriculum and poor teacher quality at the median.

 

Otherwise, at MPS, trust SFO Ibrahima Diop---  and return to my comments under the first bold heading.

 

……………………………………………………………………….

 

Read my book, Understanding the Minneapolis Public Schools:  Current Condition, Future Prospect.

 

Read my academic journal, Journal of the K-12 Revolution:  Essays and Research from Minneapolis Minnesota.

 

Read the 1800 articles on my blog---   the recent ones, at the very least.

 

Don’t get distracted.

 

Stay focused on the most  vexing issues pertinent to curriculum and teacher quality.

 

 

My very best to you---

 

Gary


Gary Marvin Davison, Ph.D.

Director, New Salem Educational Initiative

No comments:

Post a Comment