Sep 7, 2020

Article #1 >>>>> >Journal of the K-12 Revolution: Essays and Research from Minneapolis, Minnesota<, Volume VII, Number 3, September 2020


Article #1

 

The Gravity of the Dilemma

That Is the Abomination of PreK-12 Education

at the Minneapolis Public Schools

 

Fully grasp as you read this edition of Journal of the K-12 Revolution:  Essays and Research from Minneapolis, Minnesota the ineptitude revealed in student proficiency rates for academic years ending in 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019    >>>>>

 

MPS Student Academic Proficiency Rates as Measured by Minnesota Comprehensive Assessment (MCA) Results for 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019

 

>>>>> 

 

Math                     2014       2015       2016      2017      2018         2019    

 

African                  23%       19%         19%      16%          17%          18%

American

 

American             23%        19%           19%       16%        17%         18%

Indian

 

Hispanic               31%         32%          31%       29%        26%         25%

 

Asian                     48%         50%          50%       44%        46%        47%

 

White                   77%         78%          78%       77%        77%         75%

 

Free/                     26%         26%          25%       24%        22%        20%

Reduced

 

All                          44%         44%           44%     42%        42%          42%

 

Reading               2014       2015       2016      2017      2018       2019

 

African                  22%       21%         21%      21%       21%           23%

American

 

American             21%        20%         21%      22%        23%               25%

Indian

 

Hispanic               23%         25%          26%       26%        27%      29%

 

Asian                     41%         40%          45%       38%        44%      50% 

 

White                   78%         77%          77%       78%        80%       78%

 

Free/                     23%         23%          23%       25%        25%      25%

Reduced

 

All                          42%         42%           43%     43%        45%       47%

 

Science               2014       2015       2016      2017      2018        2019

 

African                 11%       15%         13%      11%       10%                  11%

American

 

American             14%        16%        13%      16%       13%           17%

Indian

 

Hispanic               17%         18%        21%      19%       17%          16%

 

Asian                     31%         35%       42%       31%       34%          40%

 

White                   71%         75%        71%       70%       71%               70%

 

Free/                     14%         15%        17%       16%      15%          14%

Reduced

 

All                          33%        36%        35%        34%      34%                 36%

Also hold firm to the incompetence demonstrated by graduation rates:

>>>>> 

Percentage of Students Graduating

 

                                2013     2014       2015      2016       2017       2018

 

Student

Category

 

African                             44.8%     47.8%    52.8%    59.5%     56.9%      61.7%  

American

 

 

 

 

4

American         38.1%     25.6%    36.3%    37.4%     29.8%      37.8.%  

Indian

 

Asian                  69.7%    78.8%    83.3%    85.6%      82.5%     87.1%  

 

Hispanic            42.8%    44.5%    57.6%    50.6%      56.7%     57.1%  

 

White                75.8%    77.4%    82.5%     85.1%     86.0%     86.7%  

 

Free/                  47.4%    49.7%    56.8%     56.9%     56.7%     61.4%  

Reduced

Lunch

                                                                                               

Homeless          26.1%    26.1%    37.3%     35.7%     40.1%     37.8%  

Highly

Mobile

 

Advanced           85.6%   86.7%    90.4%     89.3%     83.3%     90.8%  

Learner

 

Female                60.3%   62.1%    69.0%     71.7%     69.3%     71.8%  

 

Male                    51.9%   55.6%    61.3%     63.0%     63.1%     66.6%  

 

All                          56.1%  58.8%    65.1%     67.3%     66.0%     69.2%  

Students

                                                                                                                                                     

However bad you may think education is in the Minneapolis Public Schools, the situation is much worse than your perception, and the dilemmas that have gotten the most attention do not represent the gravest vexations of the district.

The problems have little to do with the Comprehensive District Design (CDD), transparency, culturally responsive curriculum, lack of community input, or any of the other shibboleths mumbled by ill-informed critics.

The actual problems center on curriculum and teaching.

Students at grades preK-5 (elementary schools) learn a modicum of reading and arithmetic but little else.  Substantive and comprehensive instruction in natural science, the social sciences, quality literature, and English usage is absent.  Knowledge imparted as to multiple genres and world traditions in music and visual art is slight.  Students graduate from grade 5 having little grasp of economics, government, American history, world history, biology, or quality literature across ethnicity and world traditions.  They have gained little introduction to the natural sciences of biology, chemistry, or physics---  with no sense of the origin of the universe, the evolution of plant and animal life on earth, human origin and dispersal, the formation and diversity of ecosystems, the defining qualities and importance of natural elements, and the fundamentals of velocity, mass, energy, Newtonian laws of motion, and Einsteinian theories of the physics of the cosmos.

Substantive education is little better at the middle school (grades 6-8) level.  Students progress a bit in mathematics, gaining some knowledge of algebra and geometry, but if they ever gained fundamental arithmetic skills, these atrophy;  lack of knowledge of multiplication tables is the rule, not the exception.  Students advance little in other academic subjects.  They may dabble in a foreign language and gain some vocational skills, but they move on to high school almost as ignorant of biology, chemistry, physics, government, American history, world history, economics, quality world and ethnic literature, and the fine arts as when they entered middle school.

Instruction at high schools is mediocre at the median, rarely excellent, and frequently abominable.  Substantive education is lacking, except in Advanced Placement courses, and only a few teachers possess the knowledge base necessary to render quality college preparatory instruction, so that students scoring the 4 or 5 demanded by most colleges and universities are very few.  Administrators at the Minneapolis Public Schools and the other schools of Minnesota make a big show of administering the ACT to all students, but they do not prepare them for the test.  Across the high schools of the district, the typical ACT median is 16, which barely indicates middle school much less college readiness.  Ask a young person from an impoverished and challenged familial situation what she or he scored on the ACT, and the reply is typically “13”---  or worse.  Administrators and teachers at the Minneapolis Public Schools deliver an acceptable education to no student, of any demographic descriptor;  the education rendered to students experiencing multiple life challenges of historical and current societal abuse is morally negligent and vulnerable to litigious action.

One-third of the less than seventy percent of students managing to graduate and go forth to college matriculation require remedial courses.  No student is truly well-prepared by the schools of the district.  Any acceptable level of college preparation occurs due to the human rarity of herculean personal interest and self-education through extracurricular reading and study;  or, as in the case of many students from affluent families, through private tutorial instruction.

Teachers in the Minneapolis Public Schools have slim knowledge bases.  Elementary school teachers have little subject area knowledge;  many are math-phobic and do little substantive reading on their own time.  Middle and high school teachers tend to have majors in a specific academic discipline, but few have master’s degrees in the key academic fields of mathematics, biology, chemistry, physics, political science, history, economics, or literature:  They are not scholars and their academic interest is typically limited in the extreme.  In class they show too many videos, give too many “free days,” assign too many frivolous and inefficient projects, and relegate too much student activity to group rather than individual academic endeavor.

You are not likely to have known education at the Minneapolis Public Schools is this bad until you read the above account;  even now, you may have a hard time grasping that education at MPS schools is this abominable---  but ponder the facts of the matter until you internalize the extremity of the dilemma, because the situation is just this abysmal.

………………………………………………………………………………….

 

Excellent education is a matter of excellent teachers imparting broad and deep knowledge and skill sets in the liberal, technological, and vocational arts to students of all demographic descriptors;  such curriculum is so comprehensive as to be seamlessly and necessarily culturally responsive.

 

An excellent teacher is a professional of broad and deep knowledge with the pedagogical ability to impart that knowledge to students of all demographic descriptors.

 

Until we redesign curriculum for knowledge intensity and train teachers capable of imparting such a curriculum, utterance of the typical buzz words and activity of that erratic and episodic sort generated by such distractions as the Comprehensive District Design constitute silly sound and futile fury.

No comments:

Post a Comment