Dec 18, 2019

Intellectual Lightweights Superintendent Ed Graff, Executive Director Aimee Fearing, and Department of Teaching and Learning Staff Ensure That MPS Comprehensive District Design is a Failure in Paramount Academic Component


Superintendent Ed Graff is an academic mediocrity and in that regard he is typical of his profession.


 

Soon after Superintendent Bernadeia Johnson resigned (effective January 2015), I told the Minneapolis Public Schools Board of Education that they should not conduct a nationwide search because finding a superior candidate with conventional training is a near impossibility.  Although Michael Goar had been brought in (Johnson says at her own behest) to serve strangely as Chief Executive Officer (that title [unusual in the locally centralized school district] would signal similar duties to a superintendent), and he did quickly become a leading candidate for the post, I was myself thinking at the time of Michael Thomas, then Chief of Schools with administrative oversight of the associate superintendents.  “Go in-house,” I told members of the board in one of my messages during Public Comments at a meeting in spring 2015 as preparations for the search began.  “You’re not going to find anyone more qualified than some of our own administrators [I was not yet openly touting Thomas, thinking that Eric Moore and others were also viable vehicles of knowledge-intensive, skill-replete education];  superintendent candidates with the typical certifications have all been trained in the same way, and thus all have been intellectually ruined by education professors.”

 

The board went ahead with the search, botched that search in multiple ways, opted ultimately for Graff, who indeed has a conventional profile, and who has been just as ineffective in Minneapolis as he was in Anchorage. 

 

……………………………………………………………………………

 

Graff has proved himself to be an able administrator, paring the Davis Center (MPS central offices, 1250 West Broadway) from approximately 650 to 450 staff members and giving scope for brilliant Chief of Finance Ibrahima Diop to work the district out of a financial tangle and devise a structurally balanced budget.  But Graff has no idea of how to design a preK-12 curriculum toward the impartation of broad and deep knowledge to students.

 

In perusing my presentation of Graff’s training and experience in Part One, Facts, note that Graff has a degree in elementary education from the University of Alaska, Anchorage;  and an online master’s degree in educational administration from the University of Southern Mississippi.  Elementary education, while constituting the requisite training for one of the nation’s most important jobs, features the weakest academic training on any college or university campus.  The online degree from a lower tier university is suspect and in any case whatever of value is learned in the pertinent courses is not focused on any subject area (mathematics, natural science, history, government, or English) that should be at the core of any preK-12 curriculum.

 

Accordingly, three and a half years into Graff’s tenure at the Minneapolis Public Schools (his contract was renewed in spring 2019), student academic performance (see the pertinent presentation in Part One) is essentially flat and for some key demographic groups has gone down.  As I have repeatedly told Graff and members of the board, for academic performance to advance for all demographic groups, 1) curriculum is going to have to be overhauled to deliver carefully sequenced knowledge and skill sets throughout the preK-12 years;  2) teachers must be thoroughly retrained;  3)  a Department of Resource Provision and Referral must be created and staffed with people comfortable connecting with students and families living at the urban core, right where they live;  4)  highly intentional academic development experiences must be provided to all students, focused on basic skills or enrichment opportunities as necessary and appropriate;  and 5) the bureaucracy must be pared.  Only the last of the five-point program has been in some measure realized. 

 

We must transform locally centralized school districts such as the Minneapolis Public Schools so as to impart to our young people a knowledge-intensive curriculum, delivered by teachers who are themselves bearers of knowledge.

 

To do that, citizens, including those who claim an interest in the public schools, must become much more discerning in their understanding of the system that fails so many of our precious young people.

 

Ed Graff’s assumption of a second  three-year term (should he defy the odds and actually stay the full three-year [academic years 2019-2020, 2020-2021, and 2021-2022] term of the current contract, totaling six years for a tenure that began with his first contract on 1 July 2016) came at the behest of the members of the MPS Board of Education, who voted 8-0 (KerryJo Felder was absent) on 14 March 2019 to offer the second contract.

Graff is a salient example of the academically mediocre superintendent inflicted on our young people by departments, schools, and colleges of education;  and an example of the mediocrity witnessed generally among academic decision-makers and teachers in our locally centralized school systems.

In opting for a lightweight master’s degree, from an institution of meager quality, while serving as an administrator in the Anchorage School District, Graff exercised the option typical of the locally centralized school district administrator, who seeks not knowledge but rather enhanced professional remuneration in ascending the bureaucratic ladder.

Graff’s meager academic credentials are as follows:

Academic Credentials

Ed Graff               (Superintendent)

 

Degrees Earned                                                Institution at Which Degree Was Earned

 

M. A., Education Administration    University of Southern Mississippi

             (online degree)

B. A., Elementary Education            University of Alaska, Anchorage

Other Credentials

Professional Licensures

District Professional Administrator, District Superintendent

District Professional Administrator, Principal K-12

Graff spent ten years as a teacher in the Anchorage School District (ASD) and then sixteen years as an administrator.  As an administrator, these positions included the following:

Professional Background

Anchorage School District, 2000-2016

Superintendent, 2013-2016

Chief Academic Officer, 2009-2013

Executive Director, Elementary Education, 2008-2009   

Readers should notice that Graff spent five years in positions that very directly gave him the opportunity to implement an effective academic program;  and another three years (for a total of eight) as superintendent, whose driving goal should be to design an organization that delivers knowledge-intensive curriculum, imparted by knowledgeable teachers.

But now recall that after all of those years, by the academic year ending in 2015, achievement of students in the Anchorage School District was very low (again peruse the data in Part One).

Elsewhere on Graff’s resume one finds evidence of success in bureaucratic streamlining and fiscal management.  Those are the areas in which Graff has acted most adroitly as MPS superintendent.  But all of this will go for naught if student academic proficiency levels continue to languish.

Graff has become an effective manager of the school district bureaucracy as to finances, including the elimination of the most unnecessary staff positions.  He has, though, been a failure as leader of the academic program, which is that all that ultimately matters, that which all other administrative maneuvers must serve.

………………………………………………………………………………..

Ed Graff’s program at the Minneapolis Public Schools has focused on 1)  Social and Emotional Learning;  2)  Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS);  3)  literacy;  and 4) equity.

Of these four key programmatic areas under Graff, literacy is a very basic skill that under previous administrations nevertheless was not addressed in any coherent fashion.  Graff and staff tout the new Benchmark curriculum as addressing this fundamental skill, but objective results (see Part One) have not been forthcoming.  And equity can only be achieved if teachers impart a knowledge-intensive, skill-replete education to students of all demographic descriptors.

In advancing Multi-Tiered System of Support, the Graff administration seeks to address the needs of students by identifying academic, psychological, and social needs of students and addressing those needs with the appropriate professional assistance.  This would be a promising initiative if adroitly conceived and then implemented district-wide.  Such conception and implementation have not occurred.

This leaves Social and Emotional Learning as defined by the organization CASEL, with which Graff was affiliated as a failed administrator in Anchorage.

CASEL (Cooperative for Academic, Social, and Emotonal Learning), based in Chicago, was founded in 1994.  Both CASEL and the term “social and emotional learning” were created at a meeting in 1994 hosted by the Fetzer Institute.   The meeting was meant to address a perceived need for greater coherence in an array of programs pertinent to drugs, violence, sex education, and civic and moral responsibility.  Social and Emotional Learning is meant to bring coherence.

In 1997 CASEL and the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) brought together writers and researchers to produce Promoting Social and Emotional Learning:  Guidelines for Educators.  The Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning claims to have made great advances in serving the multiple needs of youth over the course of the last twenty and more years, but the abiding ill-addressed academic, psychological, and social need of students in urban school districts across the nation (including that of Anchorage and of the Minneapolis Public Schools during the Ed Graff tenure) belies those claims. 

Social and Emotional Learning focuses on five designated competencies:  1)  self-awareness;  2)  self- management;  3)  responsible decision-making;  4)  social awareness;  and 5)  relationship building skills.  This is the kind of facile thinking frequently witnessed in the utterances of education professors and pop psychologists, the kind of goals that should be assumed but not touted for any transformative power.

For when all of these admirable competencies have been achieved, there will still be the matter of academic curriculum that should be at the core of any public school system.

Ed Graff is not capable of devising such a program, nor is anyone on staff at the Davis Center or elsewhere in the school district capable of creating such a program.  My analysis of the Minneapolis Public Schools Comprehensive Design will make this incapability abundantly clear.

Ed Graff is the typically ineffective superintendent of the locally centralized school district.

The locally centralized school district should be the best conduit of an excellent education to students of all demographic descriptors.  To realize the potential of the locally centralized school district, Ed Graff and all academic decision-makers must be replaced by true academicians, scholars whose credentials feature advanced training in rigorous academic disciplines, not in lightweight education programs.

Accordingly, we must sweep the halls of the Davis Center clean of Ed Graff and academic decision-makers currently on staff and replace them with those who have respect for knowledge and are themselves knowledgeable.  Along with Graff, Aimee Fearing and staff and the Deparetment of Teaching and Learning , Michael Walker and staff of the Office of Black Male Achievement, Jennifer Simon and staff of the Department of Indian Education, and Associate Superintendents Shawn Harris-Berry, LaShawn Ray, Carla Steinbach-Huther, Ron Wagner, and Brian Zambreno must be swept away.

................................................................................................

Over summer 2019, the position of Executive Director of the Department of Teaching and Learning was bestowed upon Aimee Fearing.  This was another affront to Cecilia Saddler, who had assumed leadership of that department as Deputy Chief of Academics, Leadership, and learning after being passed over for Chief of Academics, Leadership, and Learning with Michael Thomas’s departure for Colorado Springs, Colorado.

 

Fearing’s credentials are as follows.

 

Academic Credentials for Aimee Fearing

Minneapolis Public Schools

 

Executive Director, Teaching and Learning

 

Degrees Earned          Field in Which                Institution at Which             

                                          Degree Was Earned      Degree Was Earned

 

Bachelors Degree       ESL Education                University of Northwestern

 

13 May 2000

 

Masters Degree          Education                       Hamline University

 

23 May 2003

 

Doctorate Degree       Education                       Hamline University

 

30 April 2015

 

Other Credentials

 

Professional Licensures

 

K-12 Principal Licensure

 

Expiration, 30 June 2023

 

K-12 ESL Licensure

 

Expiration, 30 June 2023

 

5-12 Communication Arts Licensure

 

Expiration, 30 June 2023

 

Thus, Fearing has the typical profile for an academic decision-maker at the Minneapolis Public Schools:  Her training is entirely in education rather than in an academic discipline (mathematics, natural science, history, government, English) that should be at the core of the curriculum of a locally centralized school district.  Fearing is not a scholar.  She is not a subject area specialist.  She should not be making decisions pertinent to academics.  And yet she leads a department that has the official responsibility for the academic program of the Minneapolis Public Schools.

 

The position of Executive Director of Teaching and Learning was most ably filled by Mike Lynch.  Lynch served under Superintendent Bernadeia Johnson and was fully behind her program of Focused Instruction, which had the potential for imparting a Core Knowledge curriculum that Lynch also embraced.  But Lynch encountered a great amount of opposition for his support of knowledge-intensive curriculum from staff members of the Department of Teaching Learning.  Although he and his immediate superior, Chief of Academics Susanne Griffin, seemed to have a good relationship, Griffin herself made few initiatives and leaned more to the prevailing anti-knowledge, education professor-espoused view of her Department of Teaching and Learning staff.  Lynch departed for graduate study in Boston in 2015.

 

Griffin brought in Macarre Traynm, whose main expertise was in Culturally Relevant Curriculum.  I met with Traynm and did not find her to have much enthusiasm for knowledge-intensive curriculum or what by then was a Focused Instruction plank of the Bernadeia Johnson program that was being sabotaged by Teaching and Learning staff members.  A mid-level Teaching and Learning official by the name of Tina Platt had responsibility for Focused Instruction, without possessing impressive credentials or the requisite knowledge base to oversee knowledge-intensive curriculum.  I advocated for the dismissal of Traynm and Platt;  Tranhym lasted just a few months and Platt also departed the district.

 

There was no Executive Director of Teaching and Learning during academic years 2017-2018 and 2018-2019.  Mercifully, this bloated department was slimmed down from 53 staff members to a current 30.  But the department is still overstaffed and full of incompetent occupants of sinecures.  The department should be cleared of present occupants, all of whom are trained in education rather than academic programs, at the graduate level and for most even at the undergraduate level. 

 

Again, we have the phenomenon of non-academicians bearing the responsibility for the academic program of the Minneapolis Public Schools.

 

If teachers were properly trained in their subject areas, there would be little need for a Department of Teaching and Learning.  No such department exists on college and university campuses to train professors, who are experts in the subjects they teach.  Such a department would be ludicrous.

 

Accordingly, the Department of Teaching and Learning should be disbanded.  Fearing and other staff members, all of them tainted by paltry education programs, should be dismissed.  As teachers are thoroughly retrained as subject area specialists, the Department of Teaching and Learning should pass into much deserved oblivion.

 

And Ed Graff should accept kudos for his adroit moves in matters of finance and administration, then resign for failing to articulate a viable academic program---  or, better, admit that he is an intellectual lightweight and seek subject area specialists among professors at universities and four-year colleges, or among independent scholars, to devise the needed knowledge-intensive, skill-replete academic program at the Minneapolis Public Schools.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment