As expected, the Minneapolis Public Schools
(MPS) Board of Education voted last evening (Tuesday, 12 March) to extend a new
contract to Superintendent Ed Graff.
This incompetent group of board members voted 8-0 in favor of a new
contract. District #2 Member KerryJo
Felder, who has had a contentious relationship with Graff and possibly might have
voted not to offer him a new contract, was not in attendance: She was dealing with the after-effects of a
fire in her home.
But new At-large Members Josh Pauly and Kim
Caprini conveyed during electoral campaign November 2018 that they would vote
to retain Graff. At the meeting, Caprini
made her case for Graff, saying (while seeming tacitly to admit that MPS faces
many unmet challenges) that the Graff administration has the district in the
best position for moving forward that she has seen during her years as a parent
and site committee member. Pauly, in the
taciturn fashion that has described his comments thus far, essentially
reiterated what Caprini and others speaking in this vein had said by the time
he spoke.
District #1 Member Jenny Arneson said that
Graff had identified his four goals (social and emotional learning,
multi-tiered system of support, literacy, and equity) and worked suitably
toward meeting them.
District #3 Member Siad Ali noted that he had
cast one of the votes for Graff’s opponent (Brenda Cassellius) at the end of
the second-phase superintendent search but had been happy with his work.
District # 5 Member Nelson Inz conveyed
that in his view the district is in much better shape, financially and in general,
than was the case upon Graff’s arrival.
District #6 Member Ira Jourdain maintained
that Graff’s focus on social and emotional learning rather than standardized
tests is the most favorable feature of this superintendent moving him to vote
for a new contract (see my comment on this Jourdain utterance at the end of
this article).
Neither District #4 Member Bob Walser nor
At-Large Member Kim Ellison commented.
………………………………………………………………………………
Be reminded that these irresponsible votes
constitute tawdry Act II following Act !, which brought Graff to the
Minneapolis Public Schools. The
superintendent search that ran from spring 2015 to spring 2016 was an abysmally
botched process. During the first phase,
the board failed to recognize the best candidate, Houston Independent School
District turn-around specialist Charles Faust;
then acted in ways that shut down that phase altogether. During the second phase, the board only
considered two finalists and opted for Graff.
Remember also that during Graff’s two years
and seven months at the Minneapolis Public Schools, student academic
achievement levels have been mostly flat but in certain areas for particular
demographic groups have actually fallen.
The number of African American students proficient in mathematics has
fallen from 19% to 17%; the American
Indian student mathematics proficiency rate also has fallen from 19% to 17%,
the mathematics proficiency rate for students on free or reduced price lunch
has dropped from 25% to 22%, and overall mathematics proficiency has declined
from 44% of to 42% during the Graff years.
Reading proficiency has risen from an
overall rate of 43% to 45% during the Graff years, a slight improvement
similarly witnessed for most demographic groups. But for African American students, reading
proficiency was flat at 21% and is still under 30% for American Indian and
Hispanic students, and for students on free or reduced price lunch.
Proficiency in science also remains
abysmal, just 34% overall with declines from 13% to 10%, 21% to 17%, 42% to
34%, and 17% to 15% respectively for African American students, Hispanic
students, Asian students, and recipients of free or reduced priced lunch.
And remember that Graff was a failure in
Anchorage, Alaska, where as the end of his three-year tenure in that district
approached the school board opted not to renew his contract. Very tellingly, Graff received an award from
the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL) during
the years encompassing that tenure of wretched student academic attainment.
Remember, too, that the Graff program
lauded by the members of the MPS Board of Education in voting to offer Graff a
new contract has no hope of improving academic results in the Minneapolis
Public Schools:
The Graff program has focused on four goals
cited by Arneson and either explicitly or tacitly mentioned by others: social and emotional learning; multi-tiered system (MTSS) of support; literacy;
and equity.
Social and emotional learning focuses on
respect for oneself and others as necessary preparation for receiving academic
instruction; this should be a given but
in itself cannot be the basis for a knowledge-intensive, skill-replete academic
program.
Multi-tiered system of support putatively
gives individual students the array of services, including counseling and
targeted academic intervention, that they need to be successful; were MTSS to work the way that the approach
should, great benefit would accrue, but there have been major problems in
implementation.
Literacy should be a given; but subject area focus should drive
improvement in reading, so that students acquire a broad vocabulary and depth
of reading comprehension across a range of academic disciplines.
And equity is a goal that will only be
reached by the provision of a knowledge-intensive, skill-replete education to
students of all demographic descriptors;
this is not happening.
…………………………………………………………………………………………
I and three others spoke against giving
Graff a new contract during Public Comments at last evening’s meeting. At least ten people were in attendance to
support those speaking against extending that contract to Graff. The rhythm of the meeting was favorably
disrupted; without these opponents, the
meeting most likely would have turned into an exercise in false adoration and
celebration.
MPS Board of Education Chair Nelson Inz and
Vice-Chair Kim Caprini interrupted the comments of those arguing against contract
extension, asserting that matters pertaining to MPS employees were off-limits
for Public Comment. The interruptions
were absurd, typically since I and other commenters were citing facts that are
in the public record. The notion that
factual reasons in the Graff record for denying him a contract were pronounced off-limits
demonstrates the deep moral corruption of a controlling board that seeks to
maintain a woeful status quo, to the political benefit of members who to a
person are bought and paid for by the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers (MFT) and
the Democratic-Farmer-Labor (DFL) Party.
I and most of the others went forward with
our comments anyway, to the clear chagrin of Inz and Caprini.
………………………………………………………………………….
The meeting of 12 March signaled a new
phase of the K-12 Revolution, for two main reasons:
First, opponents of the Graff contract who
gathered on that evening did so intentionally and will do so again, with much heftier
numbers, as community organizing becomes a much larger component of the K-12
Revolution.
One of many facets of community
organization will be mobilization for the November 2020 elections when the
seats of KerryJo Felder, Bob Walser, Ira Jourdain, and Kim Ellison will be up
for voter decisions. I intend to
organize vigorously for the defeat of all of these current members.
Jourdain has emerged as a particularly
objectionable board member for his opposition to standardized testing, which
goes so far as to urge parents and students to be aware of the opt-out possibility
with regard to the looming (spring 2019) Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments (MCAs)
that grade 3-8 students take to determine mathematics and reading
proficiency; grade 10 students take to
determine reading proficiency; and grade
11 students take to determine mathematics proficiency. Promotion of opting out of these important
assessments is irresponsibility of high magnitude.
Second, I am already entering on my blog
large portions of Understanding the
Minneapolis Public Schools: Current
Condition, Future Prospect and will very soon this spring move the book to
publication. Concurrently, I continue to
work toward completion of Fundamentals of
an Excellent Liberal Arts Education, which in fifteen chapters provides the
knowledge-intensive education that is lacking in the Minneapolis Public
Schools.
I will be using these enormous, fact-filled
tomes to exert maximum pressure on MPS Superintendent Ed Graff and the school
board that voted with such intellectual and moral corruption to renew the
contract of an administrator who has now failed miserably in two school
districts.
No comments:
Post a Comment