Jun 30, 2018

Ousting Rebecca Gagnon and Overhauling the Minneapolis Public Schools Requires that We Recognize that Revolution is Not a Dinner Party and That When Degrading Ritual Becomes Habitual, Evolution Gives Way to Revolution


As we prepare to oust Rebecca Gagnon, overhaul the Minneapolis Public Schools Board of Education, and change forever the processes that have produced such wretched public education as imparted by staff at the Minneapolis Public Schools, we must remember that revolution calls for persistent action and absolute dedication to the good of students who must have a knowledge-intensive education:

 

A revolution is not a dinner party, or writing an essay, or painting a picture, or doing embroidery;  it cannot be so refined, so leisurely and gentle, so temperate, kind, courteous, restrained…..

 

Mao Zedong

 

…………………………………………………………………

 

When degrading ritual becomes habitual, evolution gives way to revolution.

 

Gary Marvin Davison

 

…………………………………………………………………

 

When Degrading Ritual Becomes Habitual, Evolution Gives Way to Revolution.

 

>>>>> 

 

When

degrading

ritual

becomes

habitual,

multifaceted

transgression

results in

oppression,

time

comes

to

loosen

the

tether

and

know

that the

weather

has

shifted,

that

too many

gifted

are

dangling,

jangling

rambling,

scrambling

in the

wind.

 

Thus,

when

those who

should be

imparting

education

merely

cower

in their

station,

their comfortable

Davis

Tower,

any thought

of

programmatic

evolution

gives way

to

K-12

Revolution.

 

Key Tasks for the K-12 Revolution in Summer 2018 >>>>> Publication of My Book, >Understanding the Minneapolis Public Schools: Current Condition, Future Prospect<; and Vigorous Organization to Defeat Rebecca Gagnon and to Elect Those Who Will Counter the Current MPS Board of Education Assemblage of Political Hacks


Summer 2018 will be an important juncture in the K-12 Revolution.

 

Before calendric summer ends, I will present my new book, Understanding the Minneapolis Public Schools:  Current Condition, Future Prospect.  In the book I shine a harsh light on curricular weakness, teacher mediocrity, and wretched student academic performance at the Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS).  I also give credit to Superintendent Ed Graff for slimming the central office bureaucracy and making adroit personnel decisions.  I detail the program for bringing genuine educational excellence to MPS, based on knowledge-intensive curriculum, thorough teacher retraining, aggressive skill remediation, resource provision and referral, and continued reduction of the central office bureaucracy.

 

By midsummer, I will also be making the rounds in churches, community centers, and other public gathering places to advocate for the defeat of Rebecca Gagnon, who after failing to get endorsement for her aspiration as a candidate for the Minnesota State Legislature has retreated to run for a third term on the MPS Board of Education:

 

Rebecca Gagnon is a shameless political hack whose defeat should be our paramount goal in the coming November 2018 election.

 

Unfortunately, we have apparently lost our chance to oust the second worst political hack, Nelson Inz, who is running uncontested for his District 5 seat, as are Jenny Arneson and Siad Ali for the District 1 and District 3 seats.

 

For the coming election, then, the candidacies that are our best possibilities for getting members on the board who are not controlled by the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers (MFT) and Democrat Farmer Labor (DFL) party are found in the two at-large seats.  The general election will list two candidates contesting for each of these positions, so there will a run-off to eliminate one of the candidates given below in the at-large category.  Here is the line-up as matters now stand, including the uncontested seats for districts one, three, and five:

 

School Board At Large (2 seats – going to Primary)

 

Doug Mann

Sharon El-Amin

Kimberly Caprini

Josh Pauly

Rebecca Gagnon

 

School Board District 1

 

Jenny Arneson

 

School Board District 3

 

Siad Ali

 

School Board District 5

 

Nelson Inz

 

……………………………………………………………………………………..

 

Ed Graff has been a good administrator but needs lots of guidance on matters of curriculum, teacher quality, skill remediation, and family resource provision and referral.  Graff, Eric Moore (Chief of Research, Assessment, and Accountability), and other members of the Davis Center (MPS central offices, 1250 West Broadway) cabinet understand the need for objective assessment of student performance, but such assessment is strongly opposed by the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers, which currently strongly influences all school board members but Don Samuels, who is not running for reelection to his current at-large position.

 

Jenny Arneson and Siad Ali may be able to resist some MFT/ DFL pressure to support objective assessment, knowledge-intensive curriculum, and teacher retraining.  But current board members KerryJo Felder, Bob Walser, Ira Jourdain, Nelson Inz, and Rebecca Gagnon consistently do the bidding of the MFT/ DFL cohort.

 

We must defeat Gagnon and get the best two candidates for the two at-large positions that we can, impressing upon them the need for knowledge-intensive curriculum and teacher retraining.

 

This summer I will bring out the new book, make numerous public appearances, and do a great deal of organizing in looking toward the August primary and then the November general election.


We are at major juncture in the K-12 Revolution.

 

If you care about K-12 education, you must get to work.

 

The time is now and, in the spirit of Malcolm X, we must stare straight at reality and say “no more” to matters as they exist:

 

A change must and will come.

Jun 29, 2018

Understanding the Importance of the Immediately Following Multi-Article Series, “Principles of the K-12 Revolution,” Written by the National Expert on the Locally Centralized School District

Immediately following this article, readers will find a multi-article series of great importance.

 

The series draws heavily from seminal articles that I wrote for publication in the second and third editions of my Journal of the K-12 Revolution:  Essays and Research from Minneapolis, Minnesota, which I launched in July 2014.

 

I have taught students living at the urban core for 47 years and have done so in North Minneapolis for 27 years.  During the last quarter of a century, I have followed events at the Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) closely.  Close attention to events at MPS became an investigation into the inner workings of that school district in June 2014.  Since that time I have copiously gathered data and information, have attended more important events than any other observer, have had multiple meetings with MPS personnel, and along the way have recorded my findings on this blog and in the academic journal mentioned above.  I have also discussed the data and my observations on my television show, The K-12 Revolution with Dr. Gary Marvin Davison (Minneapolis Telecommunications Network [MTN], public access Channel 17 in Minneapolis, appearing every Wednesday at 6:00 PM) and at many public forums, including Public Comments made at monthly meetings of the MPS Board of Education.

 

The results of this whirlwind of data collection and activity will soon gain publication in my substantially complete book, Understanding the Minneapolis Public Schools:  Current Condition, Future Prospect.

 

No one knows more about the inner workings of the Minneapolis Public Schools than do I;  by extension, now one knows more about the functioning of the locally centralized school district than do I.
 

No one.

 

If someone makes a counterclaim, I am ready to meet them in energetic debate any time, any place.

 

…………………………………………………………..

 

The articles that you read as you scroll on down this blog, therefore, are written by the national expert on the locally centralized school district.  

 

And they are written by the thinker with the clearest philosophy of education that you will ever read.  I am ever amazed as public school officials and education change advocates alike become tongue-tied when they are asked,

 

“What is an excellent education?”

 

Officials and putative reformers alike hem and haw and stammer and stew and tend to offer some laundry list of worthy educational goals and programs---  but no fundamental definition that goes to the core of the constituent elements of an excellent education.  Likewise, few people understand the defining qualities of the truly excellent teacher.

 

You will find no such hemming, hawing, stammering, stewing, or fuzziness in the articles below.

 

What you will find instead are clear definitions of an excellent education and the excellent teacher.

 

You will find clear identification of the three main purposes of K-12 education.

 

You will find details concerning the knowledge-intensive curriculum at the core of an excellent education.

 

You will find explication of the nature of teacher retraining that must ensue at the level of the locally centralized school district to create the professionals capable of imparting information-heavy curriculum.

 

And you will find a thoughtful vision of the society that we can expect once we institute knowledge-intensive curriculum, retrain teachers, and impart an education of excellence to all of our precious children, of all demographic descriptors.

 

Read carefully.

 

Understand the seminal importance of what you are reading.

 

Then embrace the responsibility of citizenship, and get to work.

Jun 28, 2018

Essentials of Retraining Teachers at the Minneapolis Public Schools >>>>> (Part Six of a Multi-Article Series >>>>> Major Principles in the K-12 Revolution, for Mandated Study by Aspiring Superintendents and School Board Members)

In considering the essentials of teacher retraining at the Minneapolis Public Schools, be reminded of these definitions and a firm conviction:

 

Definition #1:

 

An excellent education is a matter of excellent teachers imparting a rich liberal arts curriculum in specified, grade by grade sequence to all students throughout the K-12 years.

 

                                                                                               

Definition #2:

 

An excellent teacher is a person of broad and deep knowledge, with the pedagogical skill to impart this knowledge to all students.

                                                                                               

Firm Conviction

 

People are highly intelligent creatures.  All people possessing IQs of 85 and above may learn anything there is to know. 

 

Once we get this conviction in our guts, we must acknowledge that the important factor for learning great amounts of information concerns rate of intake and processing.  People whose cognition operates at higher IQ levels will learn more rapidly than those whose IQs are in the lower range.  We then adjust our rate of delivery and our schedules projected for student acquisition of information accordingly.  But we proceed on the absolute conviction that the great bulk of students can learn anything, and that they can be properly prepared to take advanced courses no later than the high school years.

 

We then do acknowledge that some students, those operating below IQs of 85, are not likely to learn some information at an acceptable rate during the K-12 years.  Even with this acknowledgment, we must be cautious.  Cognitive assessments are extremely useful but imperfect.  We must maintain high expectations for learners traditionally consigned to “special education” classes, aspiring to give them the rich skill and knowledge sets that our enhanced curriculum offers.  We then try hard, observe

astutely, and adjust schedules as necessary.  Even people who do give evidence of genuine cognitive impairment have capacities to learn, feel, and experience for which they frequently are not credited.  We must do our very best culturally to enrich every single child entrusted to our intellectual nurturing;  then we must manifest the skill to make judgments as to the learning capacity for those who process information very slowly.  We must sensitively and accurately adjust learning schedules accordingly.

 

With our definitions of an excellent education and an excellent teacher residing at the upper levels of our consciousness;  and upon the conviction that human beings are highly intelligent creatures;  we must then set about creating highly educated students by giving them an excellent teacher in every single classroom.

 

……………………………………………………………………..             

                                                                               

In order to impart to our students their rightful inheritance of the rich storehouse of knowledge that has been generated by their fellow human beings, we need better teachers.

 

We must energetically be about the task of training teachers to deliver the high-quality, advanced curriculum.

 

We must retrain teachers at the level of the central school district, with the training that we render in our own Minneapolis Public Schools as the model that other school districts will follow.

 

To revolutionize teacher training is to revolutionize the human experience.

 

Knowledge is empowerment.  To empower teachers with knowledge is to create in them the high potential for transforming the lives of young people who have waited far too long to receive a substantive education.

 

As things stand now, many young people in the Minneapolis Public Schools are not graduating as a technical matter, which denies to them important certification in the workaday world via a high school diploma;  almost as bad is the prevailing circumstance that those who do walk across a stage at the end of their senior year to claim that formal certification lack the knowledge base that a diploma should signify. 

 

Many of our students graduate without understanding fractions, decimals, or percentages;  much less, then, do they understand algebra, geometry, trigonometry, statistics, or calculus.

 

Many graduates of the Minneapolis Public Schools have no ability to read Shakespearean literature, most have never heard of August Wilson, and in fact even the mere names of Jane Austen, Mark Twain, Herman Melville, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Lorraine Hansberry, Ernest Hemingway, Claude McKay, Langston Hughes, William Faulkner, Gwendolyn Brooks, John Steinbeck, Pearl Buck, James Baldwin, Toni Morrison, or Maya Angelou echo faintly if at all.  Most graduates cannot write an acceptable essay, nor do they have the ability to conduct research or to produce papers with proper citations (footnote, endnote, or internal).

 

Most graduates cannot tell you how long ago the Big Bang occurred, and they do not know when the Earth was formed or anything about the processes that formed our planet.  They cannot trace the evolutionary development of plant and animal life on Earth, and they cannot identify the importance of Australopithecus, homo habilis, or homo erectus.  They could not tell you about the importance of neural synapses, chemical bonding, or the difference between nuclear fission and nuclear fusion.  Mention the names Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo, Newton, and Curie and you’ll see a lot of dazed eyes and hear confused mumbling.  They may know that Albert Einstein had some wild hair and said something about “E” being equal to “MC-squared,” but they could tell you little about the physics of energy, mass, and velocity, or the relativity of time in space. 

 

Graduating seniors cannot as a rule separate out very clearly the defining features of the great river valley civilizations or tell you much about Egypt---  other than that the latter had some cool

pyramids and some ruler-types called pharaohs.  Ask students to explain clearly why the civilizations of ancient Greece, the Roman Republic and Empire, Han Dynasty China, the Mauryan Emperor Asoka, Charlemagne, the Abbasid Muslim Empire, empire of Songhay, or Mayan civilization are of such importance to humankind’s past--- and they’ll be hard-pressed to give you anything resembling an acceptable answer.  Many would struggle to distinguish a meteorite from a Shi’ite.

 

Our graduates typically walk across the stage to claim a piece of paper that does not signify any understanding of Classical Roman versus Gothic architecture;  the style of the Renaissance master painters versus those of the Impressionists, Expressionists, Cubists, Surrealists, or abstract Modernists.  They most likely could not identify whether a recording played for them is Mozart, Bach, or Beethoven;   Muddy Waters, Howlin’ Wolf, or John Lee Hooker.  They would be at a loss to explain how exactly the disparate traditions of Ma Rainey and Hank Williams gave us Elvis Presley and Buddy Holly.  Ask them to describe the contributions to architecture made by Albert Suger, Fillipo Brunelleschi, and Frank Lloyd Wright---  and those puzzled expressions would grow more intense. 

 

…………………………………………………………………………………

 

This will change with the implementations of knowledge-intensive curriculum that I detail in Volume I, No. 2, August 2014 of my Journal of the K-12 Revolution:  Essays and Research from Minneapolis, Minnesota;  and the training of teachers able to impart such a curriculum, detailed in Volume I, No. 3, August 2014 of the journal. 

 

Deliver to young people an abundant store of knowledge in mathematics, natural science, history, language arts, and fine arts and we transform their lives.  Add to those core subjects of the liberal arts the training detailed in the second edition of the journal for world languages, industrial arts,  physical education, and an abundance of specialized courses in the social sciences---  and we send a new kind of human being forth into a world that they will make better.  They will apply for employment confidently as they prepare for lives of professional satisfaction;  but, just as important, they will live lives of cultural enrichment and civic engagement.  They will have the information base and the interest to vote, to be sure.  But they will also be motivated to be active citizens, showing up at public forums, organizing for community and institutional improvement, and volunteering not as rote, guilt-driven, episodic exercise---  but as human empathy put to altruistic action in the service of people considered part of the human family.

 

To give students the knowledge base that they will need to live such high-quality lives, we will need to view teachers in a whole new way, and to train them accordingly.

 

Concisely stated,

 

K-5 teachers will undergo a full academic year, 34 weeks in all, of training that will result in their receiving a rigorous Masters of Liberal Arts degree.  Multiple weeks will be dedicated to the study of mathematics through calculus;  the natural sciences of biology, chemistry, and physics;  history, economics, and psychology;  world literature and English usage;  and the fine arts (visual and musical). 

 

Teachers at grades 6-12 will be credited for a bachelor’s degree pertinent to the subjects that they will teach.  They must then pursue and receive a master’s degree in a discipline related to their teaching specialty;  master’s degrees in education will not be recognized.

 

Teachers at both grades K-5 and 6-12 will undergo a full year as interns, at the end of which they will be evaluated for positions as teachers in the Minneapolis Public Schools.

 

Teachers will thus be professionals who have undergone rigorous training comparable to that of physicians and attorneys;  accordingly, their pay will be raised to a median of $95,000 (from the current approximate figure of $67,000), with top earners receiving salaries of $155,000.  Such public sector salaries will not quite those of private sector physician and attorney counterparts but will recognize teacher professionalism and represent significant monetary upgrades.  With teachers thus trained, the Department of Teaching and Learning, the Office of Black Male Achievement, and the Associate Superintendent positions will be eliminated.

 

………………………………………………………………………………

 

We must have such education for our precious children.  We must allow those currently mired in generational poverty to break the cycle.  And beyond the break-through into economic stability, we must give children of all demographic descriptors lives of cultural enrichment, civic engagement, and professional satisfaction for the common good of the human family.

 

We can do this through the power of a knowledge-rich education, imparted to all members of the family named Humanity, by high-knowledge, fully professionalized teachers.

Jun 27, 2018

We Must Convince the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers (MFT) to Commit to Thorough Retraining >>>>> (Part Five of a Multi-Article Series >>>>> Major Principles in the K-12 Revolution, for Mandated Study by Aspiring Superintendents and School Board Members)


Teachers are abominably trained. 


 

Education professors in departments, colleges, and schools of education throughout the United States are philosophically united around a harmful creed known as “constructivism,” which takes student experiential frames of reference and avid personal interests as the driving forces of curriculum.  In a system undergirded by this approach for identifying what is to be studied, teachers are conceptualized as “facilitators,” classroom presences adept at understanding the life experiences of students, listening to young people talk about their passions, and directing learners to resources appropriate to their life experiences and interests.

 

There is much that is initially appealing about this conceptualization of the educational experience, especially in the United States.  People in the United States frequently see themselves as rugged individualists, free to do, live, worship, work, and congregate as they choose.  To rugged individualists, there is a great deal of appeal in the notion of a freewheeling classroom of happy, smiling students enthralled with an educational experience that focuses on them, pitched to their interests, with a classroom facilitator interfering as little as possible with the students’ exciting educational journey.    

 

But such an approach shortchanges students.

 

By not transmitting to them what is their cultural inheritance, we rob students of the great body of knowledge and wisdom accumulated over the centuries from the greatest mathematicians, most brilliant scientists, finest literary masters, most adroit historians, and most supremely talented practitioners of the fine arts. 

 

…………………………………………………………………

 

Low are the odds that a young student is going to gain an early understanding of the specific Native American groups who populated the two continents of the Western Hemisphere, the importance of Columbus’s voyages to the Americas, the injustices of the Middle Passage, the essential principles of the United States Constitution, or the presidencies of Washington, Adams, and Jefferson---  unless a knowledgeable teacher presents information and directs discussions about these major historical events and personages. 

 

Unlikely in the extreme will students in the early grades come to know the difference between

deciduous trees and evergreens, exactly what causes and constitutes different forms of precipitation, what plants thrive in the tropics versus those that persist under desert conditions, how cells promote the growth of bodily tissue and anatomical organs, why Copernicus was so insightful in describing the universe as heliocentric, how Gregor Mendel revolutionized our understanding of heredity and genetics with his seminal work---   unless a teacher who knows and cares about such things conveys the wonder of scientific discovery to students.

 

Not at all predictable will be the student’s path to understanding the cultural contexts that have given us classical, blues, jazz, rock, and hip-hop music;  the musical forms that determine the classification of those musical genres;  the defining elements of tap, folk, ballet, ballroom, and hip-hop dancing;   the musical concepts of melody, pitch, and harmony;  or the distinguishing features of West African, Renaissance European, Song Dynasty, American Realist, or International Cubist visual art forms---  unless a culturally and artistically astute teacher animates a classroom with the sheer glory of these extraordinary human accomplishments in the fine arts.

               

Nor will young students be privy to the elegant simplicity of Arabic numerals;  the interplay of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division in solving and explaining so many practical problems;  the thematic unity of fractions, decimals, and percentages;  the art of selecting which of these expressions of part to whole is most efficiently applied to a given circumstance;  the magnificent equilibrium of the algebraic equation;  the combination of art and science to be observed in geometric two-dimensional and three dimensional shapes---   unless a teacher alive in the world of mathematics conveys its power and beauty to students.

 

And there is not much chance that students will gain introduction to literary masterpieces such as the A. E. Milne Winnie the Pooh books;  the stories from One Thousand One Arabian Nights;  the strange worlds that Louis Carrol created in Alice in Wonderland and Alice Through the Looking Glass;  the power of the African American folktale, The People Could Fly; or the Native American tale, Inktomi Has Two Eyes -----  unless a teacher who truly appreciates and reads high-quality literature models such love in transmission to students. 

 

And yet these are all realms of knowledge in the worlds of natural science, history, fine arts, mathematics and literature over which children as young as those in the Grade K-2 years can roam with acute understanding when taught by a teacher of intellectual substance, rather than a mere functional facilitator.  Indeed, the examples of the knowledge base that very young children are capable of building may be found in the Core Knowledge curriculum of E. D. Hirsch, and in my own full description of curriculum properly sequenced for transmission by teachers throughout the K-12 years in the immediately prior edition (Volume I, No. 2, August 2014) of this Journal of the K-12 Revolution:  Essays and Research from Minneapolis, Minnesota.    

 

When we give students room to make their own decisions for research efforts, we must make sure that they have a solid informational base on which to identify topics for investigation.  When we ask young people critically to analyze an issue, we must ensure that they have the factual knowledge necessary to inform their analysis.  We take from our students something very precious when we deny to them their cultural inheritance in mathematics, literature, history, natural science, and the fine arts.

 

And if we deny them thusly, we send our students across the stage at graduation, after thirteen years of schooling, almost as ignorant as they were when they entered Grade K---  however thoroughly their egos have been massaged on the flimsy notion that the curriculum should be guided upon their own whims.

                                                                                               

The level of knowledge that abides in the heads of most high school graduates is unconscionable.

 

To correct this violation of a public trust, to rectify our failure to provide common skill and knowledge sets to all of our precious young people, whatever their demographic descriptors, we need better teachers.  We need teachers who respect knowledge and have it rumbling along their neural pathways, ready to be imparted with conviction, energy, joy.

 

To do this we must overleap the impediments posed by the vapid creed of education professors in our departments, colleges, and schools of education.

 

At the central school district level, we must retrain our teachers to deliver the advanced curricular content that I detailed in the immediately prior edition of Journal of the K-12 Revolution:  Essays and Research from Minneapolis, Minnesota.

 

………………………………………………………….

 

Over the long haul, we need to dissolve our departments, colleges, and schools of education and come to a consensus on a new approach to training teachers. 

 

But this will take a lifetime or two, and we do not have time to wait.

 

We must immediately implement my program for training and certification of primary and secondary teachers of substantive intellect and exemplary pedagogical skill. 

 

My program focuses on an approach that would transform teacher training throughout the United States.  The approach to be implemented nationally follows logically from the program of teacher training that I assert to be ideal for the Minneapolis Public Schools.  The transformation nationally will require much time to confront entrenched interests of the many adults in the education establishment who benefit from the current system that is so deleterious to the interests of excellent teachers and students waiting to receive a substantive education.   The program designed for the Minneapolis Publics Schools could be implemented immediately, given full focus and dedication to the task, before that time when we can expect to dismantle departments, schools, and colleges of education.   

 

The immediate task is to retrain teachers newly certified after participating in current, useless programs of teacher preparation.  As to veteran teachers, my abiding estimate is that no more than 10% of the teachers presently on staff in the Minneapolis Public Schools are truly excellent;  15% are so terrible that they never should have been allowed in a classroom;  and the remainder fall in the broad 75% that are intolerably mediocre.  The terrible teachers in that 15% category will most likely always be terrible and in almost all cases will have to be jettisoned.  Most teachers in the 75% category of mediocrity should be given the option to retrain and prove their mettle for retention.  For those already operating at levels of true excellence, incentives should be put in place for them to retrain according to processes detailed in these articles, but a flexible approach may be utilized for those already manifesting abundant knowledge and high-level performance.

 

In the article that I will post on this blog tomorrow, I will provide a summary of the essential features for teacher retraining that we must convince the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers leadership and rank and file to undergo, so that they can reach their potential as teachers and impart a truly excellent education to all of our precious children, of all demographic descriptors.