Generally Unrecognized Key Vexations Pertinent to the
Minneapolis Public Schools
The
wretched quality of teacher training is the fundamental reason for the
abominable quality of public education.
Education
professors infect prospective teachers with an anti-knowledge ideology that
maintains the conceit that set bodies of knowledge are not necessary, that fact
can always be looked up, and that teachers should respond to the driving
interests of students in creating curriculum.
Many people may respond with wagging heads of assent until the reality
is considered:
In
actuality, students as prospective professionals and citizens need vast set
bodies of knowledge in mathematics, natural science, history, government,
economics, quality literature, and the visual and musical arts to have the
information base to enjoy life to the fullest, to be responsible citizens, and
to be prepare to become skilled workers and professionals.
Facts can
indeed be looked up, but now more than ever, in the age of digital sources of
disinformation and information, people need a strong information base to
evaluate the credibility of these sources.
And, while
driving interests of students should always be encouraged, young people need
the contextualization provided by broad knowledge to comprehend those topics of
most immediate interest to the student.
Wretched
teacher training degrades curriculum and results in terrible pedagogy,
resulting in the embarrassing quality of education at the Minneapolis Public
Schools and other public school districts.
…………………………………………………………………………………
But few
members of the public have any understanding of these key vexations, and a host
of other dilemmas, largely unnoticed by the public create an environment that
worsens the quality of preK-12 education.
In this
edition of Journal of the K-12 Education:
Essays and Research from Minneapolis, Minnesota, I consider these
five unnoticed vexations that go mostly unnoticed by the public: 1) the increasing meaninglessness of the high
school diploma; 2) the lack of concern
for the particular struggles of students facing conditions of poverty and other
challenges of life at the urban core; 3)
poor quality of school board members; 4)
the shallow knowledge of journalists, opinion piece writers, and other outside
observers; and 5) the low chances,
approaching zero, of finding an adequate superintendent.
Consider,
then, the articles that follow in the succeeding pages.
No comments:
Post a Comment