The Shallow Knowledge of Outside Observers
The
Minnesota Department of Education (MDE) is so chronically ineffective that the
worry cast with considerable frequency by Katherine Kersten with regard to
mandates issued by the MDE are unwarranted. Kersten especially worries
abidingly that academic standards issues are too liberal (as in ”woke”), as if
those standards are ever taught by teachers in systems such as tht eh
Minneapolis Public Schools.
Those
standards are not taught by the teachers of the Minneapolis Public Schools, so
Ms Kersten can quit fretting.
Take as
indication of MDE ineffectiveness a Minnesota State Office of Legislative
Auditor’s (OLA) report issued in 2023, a review of MDE oversight of four
programs: American Indian Education (AIE), Achievement and Integration
(A&I), World’s Best Workforce (WBWF), and Regional Centers of Excellence
(RCE). WBWF legislation in Minnesota was passed in 2013 and A&I
was given that appellation and updated in the same year. These
programs anticipated federal Every Student
Succeeds
Act (ESSA) legislation then under development and passed in Congress in 2015.
WBWF
programs purportedly have the five-fold goal of closing the achievement gap,
readying
all
students for school as kindergarteners, promoting grade-level literacy for all
third-grade students,
preparing
all high school graduates for career or college, and sending all high school
students forth to
graduation. Similarly,
A&I goals are to reduce academic disparities, pursue racial and economic
integration,
increase student academic achievement, and increase equitable educational
opportunities. None
of the programs under WBWF and A&I have achieved their aims and have no
capacity to do so. These programs serve only to meet the legalistic
requirements of ESSA and the
state
response to ESSA known as the North Star Accountability System.
Minnesota
school districts submit annual reports to MDE concerning programming for WBWF
and
A&I, but none of the programs are effective in increasing student
proficiency for those lagging
below
grade level, typically serving only a fraction of the “protected groups”
(African American/Black,
Hispanic/Latino,
American Indian/Indigenous students, and those receiving free/reduced price
lunch)
targeted
for increased proficiency. Further, as the OLA report conveys, MDE
does little besides
receiving
the reports and reporting in turn to the Legislature: no follow-up in terms of
investigating
program
effectiveness ever occurs.
As to AIE,
state legislation and MDE implementation is also ineffective. The
legislation, passed
in 2021,
serves the aim of closing the achievement gap “between American Indian students
and their
more
advantaged peers.” In this case, MDE is given an explicit statutory
responsibility to develop a
strategic
plan for addressing the achievement gap, and to consult with the American
Indian
community,
evaluate the state of American Indian education in Minnesota, approve pertinent
district
and
charter school plans, assist districts and charter schools in meeting goals,
and approve
preparation
programs for teachers of American Indian language and culture. The OLA report
finds
that MDE
has not met most of these statutory responsibilities.
The OLA
report, reflecting negatively on the efficacy of WBWF, A&I, and AIE
programs and
MDE
oversight, is more favorable to the Regional Centers of Excellence
(RCE). But the evidence cited
in
offering the positive comments is very thin. The success cited involved just 20
percent of schools
served. Although
RCE staff members are not formally employed by the state of Minnesota, most of
those
involved in addressing academic proficiency have been teachers certified and
operating within
the same
system that has produced such wretched proficiency rates (at the time the
report was issued, just 46% in reading and 53% in mathematics for white
non-Hispanic students, with achievement gaps of 37, 30, and 29 percentage
points between non-Hispanic white students and their American Indian, African
American, and Hispanic peers respectively).
There are
only 57 total staff members at the six RCEs (located in Sartell [11 staff
members],
Mountain
Iron [10], Thief River Falls [10], Rochester [15], Marshall [9], and Fergus
Falls [6]; the
Minneapolis
Public Schools and St Paul Public Schools supposedly receive direct MDE support
similar
to that
provided by the RCEs. There are over 2,100 traditional and charter
schools in Minnesota with
a total of
843,404 students. Considering that RCE staff members total only 57,
this means that there is
one staff
member for every 37 schools and for every 14,797 students. Given the
establishment
qualifications
of RCE staff members and those high ratios, the notion that RCES can address
lagging
student
proficiency rates in Minnesota is preposterous.
No federal
or state level bureaucracy will ever result in knowledge-intensive,
skill-replete
curriculum
or improve teaching quality in the school districts of Minnesota and throughout
the United
States. Because
of our mania for local control, only a locally centralized school district
could
superintend
the needed overhaul. My own efforts are to induce the requisite
transformation in the
Minneapolis
Public Schools.
And any
official in that school district, or at the Minnesota Department of Education,
who
would like
to engage me in a formally refereed debate in a public forum regarding the
analysis made
above,
know that I stand ready at any time to have that debate.
I do not
expect school district or MDE officials to engage me in that
debate; they will not be eager for me further to expose their
incompetence.
No comments:
Post a Comment