Nov 6, 2026

Reflections on What the Results of the 3 November 2026 Elections Do and Do Not Mean

Results of the 3 November 2026 midterm elections bear much good news:

 

The victories of Sherrod Brown in Ohio and James Talarico in Texas were heartening confirmation of the good news that we were coming to expect.  While less than a perfect person, Peltola in victory should she outlast others in the ranked voting scheme would be a welcome addition to the already burgeoning senatorial count.  I am elated at the victory of Annie Andrews in South Carolina and the apparent squeaker of a victory for Scott Colom over the offensive Cindy Hyde-Smith should those post-marked mailed ballots go his way and (along with a favorable Peltola outcome) bring the Senate total for Democrats to 56.  And, given that the outcome seemed far from assured, I am very most moved by Gina Hinojosa’s win as governor for Texas.

 

My most grieving moments have been for the stalwart independent Dan Osborn, who seemed the ideal, highly intelligent, blue-collar candidate to take Nebraska and early in the evening seemed to be on a trek to victory.

 

Great news, all of this but the latter, but I am no more optimistic now than I was before the election.

 

And I do not think that the United States electorate performed any noble action on Tuesday.

 

Perpend >>>>>

 

………………………………………………………………………. 

………………………………………………………………………. 

 

I'm an optimistic guy (which surprises some people who witness my activist stances and view me as an angry rabble-rouser [and to be sure, I thrill at rousing the rabble on the Minneapolis Public Schools Board of Education and elsewhere in the education establishment]).  I am indeed, though, optimistic by nature, my maternal grandmother's in-her-mold grandson.  And then activists tend heavily toward the optimistic:  

 

Did Martin Luther King or Gloria Steinem not think that they were going to induce change?

 

I maintain that this is the best time to be alive:

 

Despite the lower middle class, alienated male reactionaries who have resented the gains of nonwhite and female populations over these many decades, those gains are a matter of fact and will not recede;  and then we added great advancement of LGBTQ citizens to the aspirations many of us had in the sixties and early seventies.  But the opposition of those blue-collar male reactionaries, the demagogues who have duped them, and the intellectual far right (Federalist Society;  Heritage Foundation) is formidable.

, 

That opposition is another reason for my optimism, and for saying that this is the best time in United States history.  With democracy under siege, we have had a chance to defend our great institutions.   So there went the organizations Indivisible, Run for Something, and the stalwart American Civil Liberties Union;  and here came No Kings.  

 

To those who complain about government, my rejoinder abides  >>>>>

 

"If you don't like the government in a democratic society, then you do not like yourself:  

 

You are the government."

 

As Tim Snyder maintains so eloquently, citizens in a democratic society must be ever vigilant:  The threat is eternal, so the fight must ever abide.

 

The nobility in our contemporary political history has lain with those who worked for the political advancement of women, nonwhite populations, and people of various sexual and gender identities;  and in the on-the-ground activities of those already acting and continuing to act in the manner prescribed by Tim Snyder.

 

But the United States electorate only tangentially if at all acted nobly on Tuesday.

 

People were paying more than they wanted to pay at the gas pump and for all manner of goods (beef, coffee, canned goods, produce, electronic goods, digital devices, clothes, furniture, cars, paper goods) at Walmart and Cosco.

 

So in the same way that that they had voted for Trump because they thought that he would bring them lower prices, they voted him out because he hadn’t.  Then some claimed that that they had had come-to-Jesus moments in response to Trump’s treatment of women, immigrants, nonwhite populations, the press, and anyone who oppose Donald J.;  but these are what I call, “made-up reasons” >>>>> at best, ancillary sentiments, rationalizations.  The United States electorate rejected Trump because voters lamented the price of goods and in some cases were experiencing elevated  financial pain.

 

When we walk down any sidewalk, we are likely to pass people 40% of whom still voted for authoritarianism on Tuesday;  that would be four out of every ten people we pass, almost as likely to pass them as those who voted against authoritarianism, whatever their actual fiscal reasons.

 

Democracy will prevail not because of what happened on Tuesday but because we had brilliant framers who generated the most amazing governmental document ever created in the United States Constitution.  Ironically, most of the very greatest proponents of liberty were slave owners, many of whom knew that the source of their income was wrong and who conceived a document that could and did eventually legislate their slave-owning class out of existence. 

 

And they made a way for Lucretia Mott, Ida B. Wells-Barnett, Kwame Toure, Robin Morgan, and the stalwarts in those door-pounding, ground-trekking, political activists who prove that in a democracy the people rule and government is never any enemy unless we allow ourselves to be our own enemies.

 

My optimism, then, lies in citizenship in a democracy.

 

I have selected for the main target of my own activist energies the most important of all our institutions for the production of citizens:  the public schools.  And when I go six feet under, I will know that I have done all that I could do, with documents left behind to show others the way. 

 

 

Nov 4, 2026

Results of the 3 November General Election, Minneapolis Public Schools Board of Education

At-Large

(Two seats were available;  those now go to Christin Crabree and Collin Beachy.)  

Christin Crabtree

     89,822

   (36.93%)

Collin Beachy

     74,208

   (30.31%)

Stephanie Johnson

     47,893

   (17.69%)

Michael Baskins

     29,619

   (12.18%)

Write-in

   1,673

  (0.69%


District 1

(One seat was available;  that seat now goes to Abdul Abdi.) 

Abdul Abdi

     13,899

   (59.18%)

Ben Lattimore

      9,465

   (40.38%)

 Write-in

     122

  (0.57%)


District 3

(One seat was available;  that seat now goes to Shannon Gibney.)  

Shannon Gibney

     14,135

   (98.26%)

Write-in

   250

(1.74%)

 

District 5

 (One seat was available;  that seat now goes to Becca Dryden.) 

Becca Dryden

     21,285

   (64.72%)

Molly Chase

    11,392

   (34.64%)

   Write-in

      211

   (0.64%)

 

Nov 2, 2026

Two Cases of Rapid Salary Increase at the Minneapolis Public Schools Davis Center (Central Offices)

Ryan Strack

(Senior Executive Officer)  

April              May         July       September       May

 2025             2025         2025          2025            2026

$132,225    $149,636   $149,636   $210,865   $210,865

 

Scott Weber

(Executive Director, Human Services)  

April              May         July       September       May

 2025             2025         2025          2025            2026

$143,389    $169,739   $169,739   $175,717   $175,717 

High-Salaried Minneapolis Public Schools Davis Center (Central Office) Staff

Lisa Sayles-Adams

(Superintendent)  

April              May         July       September       May

 2025             2025         2025          2025            2026

$266,000    $266,000   $266,000   $266,000   $271,000

 

Ty Thompson

(Deputy Superintendent)  

April              May         July       September       May

 2025             2025         2025          2025            2026

$226,852    $226,852   $226,852   $232,478   $232,478

                                                                                                                  

Jamie Jonassen

(Superintendent)  

April              May         July       September       May

 2025             2025         2025          2025            2026

$207,295    $207,295   $207,295   $216,136   $216,136

 

Tom Parent

(Senior Operations Officer)  

April              May         July       September       May

 2025             2025         2025          2025            2026

$201,270    $201,270   $201,270   $210,865   $210,865

 

Alicia Miller

(Senior Human Resources Officer)  

April              May         July       September       May

 2025             2025         2025          2025            2026

$179,000    $183,896   $183,896   $200,821   $200,821

 

Donnie Belcher

(Executive Director, Communications)  

April              May         July       September       May

 2025             2025         2025          2025            2026

$138,000    $142,385   $142,385   $169,148   $170,790

 

Lisa Sayles-Adams

(Superintendent)  

April              May         July       September       May

 2025             2025         2025          2025            2026

$266,000    $266,000   $266,000   $266,000   $271,000

 

Ryan Strack

(Senior Executive Officer)  

April              May         July       September       May

 2025             2025         2025          2025            2026

$132,225    $149,636   $149,636   $210,865   $210,865

 

Scott Weber

(Executive Director, Human Services)  

April              May         July       September       May

 2025             2025         2025          2025            2026

$143,389    $169,739   $169,739   $175,717   $175,717

 

Kimberly Haynes

(Superintendent)  

April              May         July       September       May

 2025             2025         2025          2025            2026

$117,686    $126,736   $126,736   $129,904   $129,904

 

Front Matter and Contents >>>>> Journal of the K-12 Revolution: Essays and Research from Minneapolis, Minnesota<, Volume XIII, Number 4, October 2026

Volume XIII, No. 4                                       

 

October 2026  

 

Journal of the K-12 Revolution:

Essays and Research from Minneapolis, Minnesota

 

Minneapolis Public Schools Academic Proficiency Rates   

As Measured By Spring 2026

Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments

(MCAs)

 

A Five-Article Series

 

A Publication of the New Salem Educational Initiative

Gary Marvin Davison, Editor    

 

 

Minneapolis Public Schools Academic Proficiency Rates   

As Measured By

Spring 2026 Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments

       

A Five-Article Series

                                   

Gary Marvin Davison

New Salem Educational Initiative

Copyright © 2026

 

Contents

 

Introduction

 

Article #1

Minneapolis Public Schools Student Proficiency Rates for Year Ending in 2026 as Measured by Spring 2026 Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments (MCAs), Overall and Disaggregated by Ethnicity

 

Article #2

Minneapolis Public Schools Student Proficiency Rates for Academic Years Ending in 2014 through 2026 as Measured by Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments (MCAs), Overall and Disaggregated by Ethnicity

 

Article #3

 

Minneapolis Public Schools Student Proficiency Rates for Academic Year Ending in 2026, as Measured by Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments (MCAs):  Elementary Schools

 

Article #4

 

Minneapolis Public Schools Student Proficiency Rates for Academic Year Ending in 2026, as Measured by Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments (MCAs):  Middle & K-8 Schools

 

Article #5

 

Minneapolis Public Schools Student Proficiency Rates for Academic Year Ending in 2026, as Measured by Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments (MCAs):  High Schools

 

 

 

 

Introductory Comments >>>>> Journal of the K-12 Revolution: Essays and Research from Minneapolis, Minnesota<, Volume XIII, Number 4, October 2026

The district of the Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) is academically disastrous and has been for many decades, for which the data given in this edition of Journal of the K-12 Revolution:  Essays and Research from Minneapolis, Minnesota are illustrative.

 

For a brief phase encompassing August 2022 through January 2024, the administration of Interim Superintendent Rochell Cox and Senior Academic Officer Aimee Fearing launched several initiatives---  Tutoring Triads, online ACT tutoring, and online high dosage tutoring---  intended to address directly the key academic vexations that had long haunted the district.  Cox and Fearing were also moving deliberately to implement knowledge-intensive curriculum and to train teachers capable of imparting such a curriculum.

 

But the current administration of Superintendent Lisa Sayles-Adams, whose tenure began in February 2024, abandoned all of those promising initiatives.  The new reading curricula of the University of Florida Literacy Institute (UFLI) and Arts & Letters were introduced in response to State of Minnesota READ Act stipulations regarding the “Science of Reading,” but in the absence of the aggressive initiatives of reference and knowledge-intensive teacher training, the Sayles-Adams administration indicates little comprehension of the program necessary to advance academics in the Minneapolis Public Schools.

 

In the articles below, readers will successively observe Minneapolis Public Schools student academic proficiency rates overall and disaggregated according to ethnicity as measured by the Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments (MCAs) for the academic year ending in 2026;  a comparison to that single year with those academic years ending in 2014 through 2025;  and then student academic proficiency rates as measured by the MCAs for the academic year ending in 2026 in all MPS  elementary schools, middle & K-8 schools, and high schools.

 

Readers should contemplate the consequences of the loss of momentum achieved during the administration of Interim Superintendent Rochelle Cox (August 2022 through January 2024) and the lack of aggressive attention to academics during the tenure of Superintendent Lisa Sayles-Adams from January 2024 through October 2026.

 

 

Article #1 >>>>> Journal of the K-12 Revolution: Essays and Research from Minneapolis, Minnesota<, Volume XIII, Number 4, October 2026

Minneapolis Public Schools Student Proficiency Rates for Year Ending in 2026 as Measured by Spring 2026 Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments (MCAs), Overall and Disaggregated by Ethnicity

 

Given below are academic proficiency rates for all Minneapolis Public Schools students and for student categories disaggregated by ethnicity for academic year 2026:

 

All

Students

 

Math    Reading   Science  

                               

 37%         42%         22%

 

African

American

 

Math  Reading  Science      

 

10%      16%          4%

 

American

Indian    

 

14%     21%          9%

 

Math  Reading  Science      

 

Hispanic/

Latine

 

13%     15%           7%  

   

 

Math  Reading  Science      

 

Asian

American

           

30%      32%        18%                  

 

 

Math  Reading  Science      

 

White

            

69%      74%          44%