Sep 17, 2026

Minneapolis Public Schools Board of Education Directors May Finally Be on the Cusp of Addressing Building Usage and Other Issues Pertinent to the District’s Financial Dilemma; Then Attention Will Have to Focus on Providing a Knowledge-Intensive, Skill-Replete Education

On 29 November 2022, Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) Board of Education Finance Committee members received a clear warning from Interim Supeintendent Rochelle Cox, Senior Finance Officer Ibrahima Diop, and Executive Budget Director Thom Roethke that MPS was facing a "fiscal crisis" that could reach catastrophic proportions if drastic budgetary changes were not made.

 

At the time, the approximately $960 million annual budget was balanced, in large measure due to  federal relief funds received during the Covid pandemic;  but those funds were slated to abate in 2024.  Cox and Finance Division officials warned that massive cuts would be necessary to avoid dangerous depletion of the general fund that would put the district into operating debt.  The Finance Division’s five-year financial projections indicated that even if enrollment decline could be reversed, expenses would greatly exceed revenue.  A fiscal cliff loomed;  doing nothing was "not an option";  Roethke said that maintaining the status quo in expenditures and revenue would find the district running out of money by the end of fiscal year 2025.

 

At that juncture in November, five newly elected board members--- Abdul Abdi (District 1), Collin Beachy (At-Large), Sondra Emerich (At-Large;  later to change their given name to Joiner), Faheema Feerayarre (District 3), and Lori Norvell (District 5)---  were due to join the MPS Board of Education in January 2023.   Kim Ellison, Board Chair at the time, observed that Senior Finance Officer Diop had been warning members about the looming financial crisis for years and that the issues must be addressed very soon to keep the district sustainable.

 

Interim Superintendent Cox and Diop conveyed to finance committee members that much of the financial dilemma was due to decreasing enrollment, which at the time had declined seventeen percent, from approximately 34,000 to 28,000 students, over five years.  Projections by Diop’s staff indicated that enrollment could decrease to 23,000 students by the 2027-2028 school year.

 

The key document presented at the November 2022 meeting stated that "MPS must address both the quality of its product as well as work with policymakers and city leaders to address factors outside of its control such as crime, housing prices and transportation issues, if it hopes to stabilize.”

 

Roethke emphasized that MPS spent $3,900 more on a per-student basis in general operating costs than the average spent by the state's 15 largest districts, largely due to Minneapolis's substantially lower student-to-teacher ratios compared with other districts.  The district’s relatively large number and small size of schools produced those lower ratios. "Other districts simply operate fewer, larger schools," Roethke commented.

 

Interim Superintendent Cox declared that as the next Board and long-term superintendent made the needed changes, they should do so in a way that focused on improved academic quality for the students of the Minneapolis Public Schools.

 

…………………………………………………………………………..

 

Three and a half years later, procrastinating MPS Board of Education directors and Superintendent Lisa Sayles-Adams may be finally poised to address building usage issues and other issues related to the district’s financial woes.

 

At the 15 September 2026 meeting of the Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) Board of Education, the Superintendent Lisa Sayles- Adams administration presented three options for building usage that depending on the plan could close 9 to 16 schools.  Under any of these plans, most elementary school would have art, music, gym, reading, and math intervention specialists.  All middle school students  would have full programs of athletics and extra-curricular activities;  all high school students would have access to all classes needed to meet graduation requirements.

 

Each of the three plans would close the following schools  >>>>>  

 

>>>>>   Loring Elementary School

>>>>>    Pratt Elementary School

>>>>>   Kenny Elementary School

>>>>>   Bethune Arts Elementary School

>>>>>   Anwatin Middle School

 

Each of the three plans would move students from presently occupied buildings to continue programming in another school site  >>>>>  

 

>>>>>     Hmong International Academy (would shift culture and language magnet programming to Jenny Lind Elementary)

>>>>>     Heritage High School (Somali student program would shift to Edison High School

 >>>>>    FAIR School for Arts (would shift to North High School)

>>>>>     Longfellow Alternative High School (teen parent program would shift to North High School)

>>>>>     Wellstone International High School (program for immigrant students ages 18 to 22 still working toward English language mastery would shift to South High Schools.

        

Each of the three plans would consolidate these schools:

 

  • Lake Nokomis Keewaydin and Wenonah community schools would consolidate at the  Keewaydin campus
  • Lake Harriet Upper and Lower Elementary Schools would consolidate at the upper school campus
  • Hiawatha and Howe Elementary Schools would consolidate over time at the Howe campus, or they might be closed
  • Hale Elementary School and Field Elementary School would consolidate at the Hale Campus

 

Some plans would close these schools:

 

  • Cityview Elementary School
  • Webster Elementary School

 

(Note also that if Hiawatha and Howe do not merge, they would close.)

 

 

Former Minnesota Federation of Educators president Greta Callahan, now MPS Board of Education director for District 6, spoke vehemently against any school closures.  She complained that the decision had been made by seven central office staff without sufficient consultation with the community and that the presentation did not indicate how much money would be saved or how many families might leave the district;  and she said that the Board of Education directive to the Superintendent Lisa Sayles-Adams administration was not to bring a plan for closing schools but a plan rather for winning back the 47% of Minneapolis families of school aged children that do not select MPS over charter schools, private schools, and other districts.

 

Callahan drew loud applause from most audience members, including the heavily represented organization, Minnesota Families for Public Schools.  

 

But At-Large Board Director Joyner Emerick countered that the administration had exactly fulfilled the Board’s directive and praised the potential for equitable distributions of resources under the plans. District 2 Director Sharon El-Amin commended the plans for the potential to improve academic results for Black and Brown students.  District 5 Director Lori Norvell Board member also indicated approval, agreeing with Emerick that the administration had fulfilled directives from the Board faithfully.   District 4 Director Adriana Cerrillo, along with Emerick attending the meeting virtually, commended the administration’s hard work but was less effusive in her praise than Emerick, El-Amin, and Norvell. 

District 3 Director Lisa Skjefte was absent. 

 

District 1 Director Abdul Abdi questioned if Edison High School had the infrastructure to serve Heritage High School students, expressing fear that they might seek other options.

 

At-Large Director and Board Chair Collin Beachy commended the superintendent and administration for their hard work and conveyed openness to the changes proposed;  but he wants a plan for measuring improved academic results, and he seeks to mitigate impact on teachers.

 

……………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………….

 

The MPS Board of Education is slated to vote on these proposals at the 10 November 2026 regular business meeting, after meetings for community input occur during a period encompassing 30 September through 9 October.

 

These meetings will in all likelihood be sham events in the mold of the highly controlled Superintendent Lisa Sayles-Adams “Listening Sessions” of spring 2024, after the Board decision to hire her on 1 December 2023 and after beginning her new post on 5 February.  So no one should be fooled that community opinion is going to be taken seriously.

 

But the Board should approve one of the plans, ideally ceasing to utilize 16 buildings now serving as school sites, thereby saving operating costs so as to more wisely utilize resources.

 

Thereafter, the focus must be on providing students with a knowledge-intensive, skill-replete education, necessitating the training of teachers capable of delivering such a curriculum.

 

Rochelle Cox would have, as long-term superintendent, long since induced the Board to act on the financial crisis about which she, Senior Finance Officer Diop, and Executive Directo Thom Roethke had warned.  And she would have moved forward with her Tutoring Triad interventions, online ACT preparation, and online high dosage tutoring.  She and then Senior Academic Officer Aimee Fearing would have continued to invite such proponents of broad knowledge for intrinsic value and improved reading ability as Natalie Wexler and then skillfully induced teachers to undergo the training necessary for the provision of a knowledge-intensive curriculum.

 

The process that denied to Cox and Fearing the opportunities to continue their promising initiatives was deeply corrupt.  The Superintendent Lisa Sayles-Adams administration has been deceitful and irresponsible in seeking to blame former Finance Division officials for the crisis about which they had warned and sought so skillfully to mitigate.  Sayles-Adams is an intellectual lightweight who somehow gained doctoral committee approval at Minnesota State University/Mankato for the worst dissertation that I have ever read, yet insists on staff and Board members addressing her as “Dr.”  Her administration has taken no action to improve academic quality, lacking the comprehension and courage to take necessary action.

 

In the aftermath of the Cox and staff presentation on MPS finances in November 2022, I analyzed building usage and published suggested closings and re-purposed buildings that closely resemble the plan presented at the 15 September 2026 meeting by the Sayles-Adams administration, while also continuing in Public Comments and on my blog and other platforms to expose the academic failure of the district.

 

The MPS Board of Education is at least three and a half two years too late in moving on the building usage and financial issues;  Sayles-Adams has moved too slowly on the building usage issues since her assumption of her position and she has irresponsibly blamed the district financial crisis on people who were confronting that crisis forthrightly.

 

The MPS Board of Education should approve one of the plans addressing building usage on 10 November.

 

In the meantime, and with the distraction of the building usage matter out of the way, I will continue relentlessly to advocate for the changes necessary to provide knowledge-intensive, skill-replete education to children of all demographic descriptors

 

No comments:

Post a Comment