Historical events occur according to the same processes that determine human behavior.
The
behavior of human beings is determined by the combination of positive
reinforcement (rewards for given behaviors), punishment (aversive results from
certain behaviors), and negative reinforcement (the withdrawal of punishment)
for certain behaviors that a person of certain genetic and biological
propensities experiences in life.
Operants
(punishment and reinforcement), as these interact with the genetic and
biological qualities that define each individual, produce all behavior.
Notice,
then, two important implications:
1) Human beings do not have free will;
2) The interaction of operant conditioning and
biogenetic inheritance in determining human behavior renders irrelevant the
issue of nature vs. nurture.
The more
important debate has been between the determinists of behaviorist psychology,
versus the free will advocates of humanist psychology.
The
processes that actually determine human behavior resolve the issue in favor of
the behaviorists.
..........................................................................
This has
enormous implications for the origin of historical occurrences.
Historical
events occur due to the interaction of individuals whose behavior is determined
by operant conditioning:
A
combination of aversive and rewarding outcomes produce human behaviors and
neurally recorded experiences that create cultures and communities of
particular prevailing circumstances, which interacting individuals seek to maintain or to
change. Preference for change occurs
when a critical mass of interacting human beings agree that current conditions
are aversive enough to seek alteration.
When
masses of people seek alteration, rebellions (vigorous action against
established norms and those who preserve those norms) may occur.
But
revolution (social, cultural, or political transformation) depends on the
presence of leaders whose operantly determined behavior renders them capable of
and inclined toward directing or provoking mass discontent so as to achieve
transformation:
The
United States revolution and constitution were produced under particular
historical conditions due to the brilliance of leaders saliently represented by
Franklin, Jefferson, and Madison.
The Civil
War was conducted under particular historical conditions by a flawed but
prescient Abraham Lincoln.
Vladimir
Lenin (Vladimir Ulyich Ulyanov) interpreted the works of Marx and Lenin so as
to determine the course of the Bolshevik
Revolution under particular historical conditions of early 20th
century Russia.
Joseph
Stalin (losif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili), under particular historical
conditions, redirected the Bolshevik Revolution so as to create the totalitarian
Soviet state.
Adolf
Hitler, under the particular historical conditions of late 1920/early 1930s
Weimar Republic, conceived and implanted Nazi (National Socialist) policies
associated with that combination of factors associated with the Holocaust and
the attempt to establish a global empire.
Mohandas
Gandhi under the particular historical conditions of 20th century
British colonial India, led a movement guided by the tenets of satyagraha to
induce the exit of the colonialists from the subcontinent.
Decades
of life under the particular historical conditions of Jim Crow prevailed until a
unique combination of courage, eloquence, and organizational capabilities in
Martin Luther King made possible the 1950s/1960s Civil Rights Movement.
Centuries
of oppression of half the world’s population abided until the particular
historical conditions of the 1960s induced Gloria Steinem to create Ms.
Magazine as a fulcrum for success in the feminist movement.
Under the
particular historical conditions of lingering racist and sexist reactionary
attitudes, Donald Trump won the presidency and established an administration
under policies that were uniquely conceived or assembled to create the
circumstances of current life in the United States.
..........................................................................
Other
important historical figures assisted the above Great Moral Actors or Uniquely
Immoral Actors; but the precise course
of history was unlikely in the extreme to have occurred without these
historical presences.
The
behavior of these historical presences was determined by the particular
operants and genetic factors of each individual.
The particular
historical conditions that provided the context for the actions of these Great
Moral Actors or Uniquely Immoral Actors were the result of the interaction of
citizens, each manifesting operantly determined behavior and then gathering
with others to produce the prevailing social environment conducive to change.
Great
Moral Actors or Uniquely Immoral Actors do not change history merely as matter
of personal biographies; they require
certain prevailing conditions for achieving the outcomes for which they become
famous.
Also, beyond and below the occurrence of nation-wide social transformation, the lives of the nonfamous, the peasant, the worker, the nonliterate, the woman in patriarchal society, must be known, often through the work of anthropologists and oral historians, for a full account of history.
But in
the absence of Great Moral Actors or Uniquely Immoral Actors, nation-wide historical
change does not occur at all, occurs more slowly, or happens according to
different processes than would be the case without their leadership.
Hence,
Great
Men, Great Women, particular personalities:
They indeed matter very much.
No comments:
Post a Comment