Mar 12, 2019

Superintendent Ed Graff Should Not Be the Recipient of a New Contract at This Evening’s (12 March 2019) Meeting of the MPS Board of Education; Voters Should Remember the Outcome When They Go to the Polls in November 2020

The Minneapolis Public Schools Board of Education will vote this evening on extending a new contract to Superintendent Ed Graff.  This incompetent group of board members will most likely vote 9-0 or 8-1 in favor of a new contract.  District #2 Member KerryJo Felder has a contentious relationship with Graff and possibly might not vote to offer him a new contract.   But new At-large Members Josh Pauly and Kim Caprini conveyed in the electoral campaign of November 2018 that they would vote to retain Graff;  and according to my best assessment, District #1 Member Jenny Arneson, District #3 Member Siad Ali, District #4 Member Bob Walser, District # 5 Member Nelson Inz, District #6 Member Ira Jourdain, and At-Large Member Kim Ellison will vote to extend a new contract to Ed Graff.
 
This is irresponsible, the tawdry Act II following Act !, which brought Graff to the Minneapolis Public Schools.  The superintendent search that ran from spring 2015 to spring 2016 was an abysmally botched process.  During the first phase, the board failed to recognize the best candidate, Houston Independent School District turn-around specialist Charles Faust;  then acted in ways that shut down that phase altogether.  During the second phase, the board only considered two finalists and opted for Graff.
 
Graff was a failure as superintendent in Anchorage, Alaska.
 
Remember that his record in that school district was abysmal, represented saliently by academic year 2014-2015 as follows:
 
Brief Summary of Achievement Levels during Ed Graff’s
Tenure as Superintendent in Anchorage, Alaska
 
Results for Academic Year 2014-2015
 
All Grade Levels
 
Language Arts
 
Does Not          Partially Meets         Meets              Exceeds
Meet                 Meets                            Standard         Standard
Standard          Standard
 
Student
Categories
 
African                 35.1%                    42.1%                          20.5%                  2.3%
American
 
White/                 13.3%                    33.7%                          44.3%                  8.5%
Caucasian
 
Hispanic              28.3%                    42.3%                          26.9%                  2.5%
 
 
Alaska                   42.4%                    37.5%                           18.1%                 1.9%
Native
American/
American
Indian
 
All Grade Levels
 
Mathematics
 
Does Not          Partially Meets         Meets              Exceeds
Meet                 Meets                            Standard         Standard
Standard          Standard
 
Student
Categories
 
African                 29.5%                   51.3.%                        16.9%                  2.3%
American
 
White/                 12.9%                    39.7%                          36.5%                  10.9%
Caucasian
 
Hispanic              23.4%                    50.9%                          21.8%                  3.9%
 
 
Alaska                   29.0%                    50.3%                           18.2%                 2.5%
Native
American/
American
Indian
 
Graff has performed similarly wretchedly as prime leader of the academic program as MPS superintendent:
 
Minneapolis Public School proficiency rates for the years that include two (those ending in 2017 and 2018) of the Graff tenure are as follows:
 
MPS Academic Proficiency Rates for 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, & 2018
 
Math                     2014       2015       2016      2017      2018
 
African                  23%       19%         19%      16%       17%
American
 
American             23%        19%           19%       16%        17%
Indian
 
Hispanic              31%         32%          31%       29%        26%
 
Asian                     48%         50%          50%       44%        46%
 
White                   77%         78%          78%       77%        77%
 
Free/                     26%         26%          25%       24%        22%
Reduced
 
All                          44%         44%           44%     42%        42%
 
Reading               2014       2015       2016      2017      2018
 
African                  22%       21%         21%      21%       21%
American
 
American             21%        20%           21%       22%        23%
Indian
 
Hispanic              23%         25%          26%       26%        27%
 
Asian                     41%         40%          45%       38%        44%
 
White                   78%         77%          77%       78%        80%
 
Free/                     23%         23%          23%       25%        25%
Reduced
 
All                          42%         42%           43%     43%        45%
 
Science                2014       2015       2016      2017      2018
 
African                 11%       15%         13%      11%       10%
American
 
American             14%        16%           13%       16%        13%
Indian
 
Hispanic              17%         18%          21%       19%        17%
 
Asian                     31%         35%          42%       31%        34%
 
White                   71%         75%          71%       70%        71%
 
Free/                     14%         15%          17%       16%        15%
Reduced
 
All                          33%         36%           35%     34%        34%
 
Graff has now served as MPS superintendent for two years and seven months.  He Inherited a Strategic Plan Acceleration 2020 that was a mere exercise in goal-setting with no chance of succeeding and was based on ill-conceived philosophical principles:  Most especially, the plan identified the school as the unit of change;  to the contrary, the unit of change must be the district as a whole, with consistent overhaul transpiring in the central office at the Davis Center (1250 West Broadway) and then throughout the schools of the district.
 
Graff and staff are working on a new strategic plan. 
 
In the meantime, the Graff program has focused on four goals:  social and emotional learning;  multi-tiered system (MTSS) of support;  literacy;  and equity.  Social and emotional learning focuses on respect for oneself and others as necessary preparation for receiving academic instruction;  this should be a given but in itself cannot be the basis for a knowledge-intensive, skill-replete academic program.  Multi-tiered system of support putatively gives individual students the array of services, including counseling and targeted academic intervention, that they need to be successful;  were MTSS to work the way that the approach should, great benefit would accrue, but there have been major problems in implementation.  Literacy should be a given;  but subject area focus should drive improvement in reading, so that students acquire a broad vocabulary and depth of reading comprehension across a range of academic disciplines.  And equity is a goal that will only be reached by the provision of a knowledge-intensive, skill-replete education to students of all demographic descriptors;  this is not happening.
 
During the Graff administration, student academic achievement levels have been mostly flat but in certain areas for particular demographic groups have actually fallen.  The number of African American students proficient in mathematics has fallen from 19% to 17%;  the American Indian student mathematics proficiency rate also has fallen from 19% to 17%, the mathematics proficiency rate for students on free or reduced price lunch has dropped from 25% to 22%, and overall mathematics proficiency has declined from 44% of to 42% during the Graff years.
 
Reading proficiency has risen from an overall rate of 43% to 45% during the Graff years, a slight improvement similarly witnessed for most demographic groups.  But for African American students, reading proficiency was flat at 21% and is still under 30% for American Indian and Hispanic students, and for students on free or reduced price lunch.
 
Proficiency in science also remains abysmal, just 34% overall with declines from 13% to 10%, 21% to 17%, 42% to 34%, and 17% to 15% respectively for African American students, Hispanic students, Asian students, and recipients of free or reduced priced lunch.
 
These figures are very similar to those describing student performance when Ed Graff was superintendent of schools in Anchorage, Alaska;  very tellingly, Graff received an award from the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL) during the years encompassing that tenure of wretched student academic attainment.
 
…………………………………………………………..
 
My investigation into the inner workings of the Minneapolis Public Schools reveals superior performance in the Department of Finance, headed by Chief Ibrahima Diop;  and in the Department of Information Technology led by Fadi Fadhil.  The Operations Division is also ably run by Karen Devet;  and Maggie Sullivan is a bright young woman who is struggling mightily to bring higher teacher quality to the schools of the district.
 
But the academic program that should be the core concern of any localized school district is languishing unacceptably.  A few months back, brilliant research division leader Eric Moore was given lead responsibility for the academic program, with Cecilia Saddler as second in authority for the academic program as Deputy for Academics, Leadership, and Learning.  Working under the constraints of the inadequate Graff program, neither of these able people has articulated a vision or overseen initiatives capable of improving the academic program.  Chief of Staff Suzanne Kelly took the lead in developing the Comprehensive District Design;  that program is too tentative and does not place proper emphasis on knowledge intensity and skill development.  Associate Superintendents Ron Wagner, Carla Steinbach-Huther, and Brian Zambreno erroneously and irresponsibly act so as to protect building principals and teachers from scrutiny, rather than endeavoring to improve academic performance;  my analysis indicates that these three do not have the philosophical grasp or the professional training to implement a viable academic program, even if they embraced the responsibility.
 
Michael Walker is in his fifth year as head of the Office of Black Male Achievement;  with 7,000 African males in the district, the office serves fewer than 500 students in what is still a pilot program.  Walker’s salary has risen from $114,000 to $128,000 during his tenure.
 
Anna Ross is a woefully inadequate leader for the Department of Indian Education;  she reveals little understanding of the data that show wretched academic performance for American Indian students and little vision as to how to improve acquisition of key knowledge and skill sets by American Indian students.
 
Thus, the academic program of the Minneapolis Public Schools is the Counter-Gestalt:  rather than being more than the sum of their parts, those collectively involved in the academic program are individually less than they could be.  Even those with talent and promise are less effective than they could be:   A system of knowledge-poor curriculum, inadequate teachers, and misguided approach drags everyone to a lower level.
 
……………………………………………………………………………..
 
The prime duty of superintendent in a locally centralized school district is to oversee the creation of an academic program that provides students with a knowledge-intensive, skill-replete education.  There is no hope that the four-point program of Ed Graff or the MPS Comprehensive Design can even raise mathematics and reading skills to grade level.  An abiding embarrassment for those involved in the development of the MPS academic program is that we cannot move beyond discussion of the development of basic skills to the provision of the full array of knowledge sets in mathematics, natural science, history, economics, government, literature, and English composition because the  administration of Ed Graff is so incompetent even in addressing basic skills.   
 
Graff and the academic decision-makers and program implementers that he has assembled have failed to promote the academic progress of the young people whose education is their sacred responsibility.
 
Members of the MPS Board of Education are poised to vote to give MPS Superintendent Ed Graff a new contract.
 
If that be the case, the mass movement to overhaul processes at the Minneapolis Public Schools must build, gather force, and sweep away those board members up for reelection in November 2020.
 
And in the meantime, the sweeping away and cleaning out must include the many incompetent academic decision-makers in the current administration.

Mar 7, 2019

Article #5 (and Last) in a Series >>>>> An Examination of the Ed Graff Record in Understanding Why He Does Not Deserve a Second Contract as Superintendent of the Minneapolis Public Schools >>>>> Graff’s Meager Academic Credentials and Lack of a Promising Educational Philosophy


This is the fifth article in my series examining the record of Ed Graff, conveying to readers why he does not deserve a second contract as superintendent of the Minneapolis Public Schools.

 

In the first fourarticles of this series I offered my readers strictly objective information from Ed Graff’s record as to credentials;  tenure in several capacities for the Anchorage, Alaska, schools;  and performance in the course of the two years and seven months that Graff has served as superintendent for the Minneapolis Public Schools.  I challenged my readers to consider why I would examine the record provided and recommend strongly against reappointment.  In the fourth article, I broke from the objective data presentation to explain why he does not deserve a new contract, analyzing the Graff record for failure to improve student achievement.

In this fifth and final article of the series, I emphasize the slim academic preparation and lack of a driving educational philosophy that prevent Graff from envisioning and implementing a knowledge-intensive academic program.

………………………………………………………………………………

 

Ed Graff brings little in the way of academic credentials that would be necessary for him to articulate and bring to reality a knowledge-intensive academic program to the Minneapolis Public Schools;  further, he gives no evidence of having developed an educational philosophy that could serve as the foundation for an academic program of excellence.

 

Whenever Graff has been given a chance to express an interest in the development of strong foundations of knowledge as the driving concern of a locally centralized school district, he has demurred, retreating into education professor-like jargon about teaching the whole child.

 

At the first of five community meetings (I attended all but one of these, the one missed coming when I was In Dallas) that Graff held in the early weeks of his tenure as Minneapolis Pubic Schools superintendent, Graff gave one of his stock responses, to which I replied:

 

“Superintendent Graff, just yesterday I moved a family from Eastside St. Paul, the family having had a child in my New Salem Educational Initiative program for many years.  I have followed this family through two North Minneapolis residences, one in far South Minneapolis, another in East St. Paul, and now a duplex in Coon Rapids---  as the mother of the family continually sought more affordable Section 8 housing.  I moved the family yesterday to Coon Rapids, because they did not have the $200 that was the cheapest moving fee the mom could find to shuffle the family’s meager belongings from Eastside St.Paul to Coon Rapids.  Much in our usual manner, I talked to this highly intelligent woman about her growing up tough in Southside Chicago, her various familial and life struggles, and the hopes that she has for her boys:  Both of her sons are in my program, one a grade 10 student whom I have known since he was in Grade 1, the other a highly precocious fourth grader.

 

“So, sir, I most definitely know the value of establishing an emotional connection and getting the student to a psychological vantage point at which abundant learning becomes possible.  But I would feel myself a failure if I did not draw upon the relationships that I have with my students to deliver to them the highest quality college preparatory education.

 

“In that spirit, I ask you again:  Is the development of a strong knowledge base capable of preparing students for post-secondary education and life the ultimate purpose of K-12 education?”

 

Graff would not answer my question.

 

Graff has not had the quality of academic preparation that would abet the development of a respect for knowledge.  He secured a waiver to become superintendent, since Alaska does not require a license to occupy that role.  He conveys that he is working on graduate credits in curriculum and instruction, an ironic occurrence since knowledge deficient curriculum and poor teacher quality have continued as the prime dilemmas in the Minneapolis Public Schools during his two years and seven months as superintendent.

 

The formal credentials that Graff brought to the role of MPS superintendent are these:      

 

Academic and Professional Credentials

For MPS Superintendent Ed Graff

 

Ed Graff               (MPS Superintendent)

 

Degrees Earned                 Institution at Which

      Degree Was Earned

 

M. A., Education              University of Southern Mississippi

Administration                

 

This M.A. in Education Administration from University of Southern Mississippi is

an online degree.

 

B. A., Elementary             University of Alaska, Anchorage

Education                                           


Elementary education is the weakest major on any college or university campus. 

 

Graff’s master’s degree was of the highly suspect online sort that requires no ongoing attendance or analytical classroom exchanges with fellow students. 

 

Any rigorous academic preparation would of necessity have been of the self-teaching sort that all high quality elementary and secondary teachers develop for themselves, since teacher training programs are so inadequate.  But Graff never gives evidence of being a reader of challenging material or an articulator of intellectually acute ideas.  He is an academic mediocrity who should not be the leader at the apex of an organization the purpose of which is the impartation of abundant knowledge and skill sets.

 

Thus, this article and the previous entry (Article #4 in this series) convey that Superintendent Graff has proven inadequate as MPS superintendent for many reasons, grouped in two main categories:  

 

First, Graff’s academic credentials and propensities are meager.

 

Second, as those credentials and propensities would predict, the Graff program (described in the first three articles in this series) has been woefully inadequate, with no prospects for acceptable improvement.

 

MPS Superintendent Ed Graff’s contract most assuredly should not be renewed.  

Mar 6, 2019

Article #4 in a Series >>>>> An Examination of the Ed Graff Record in Understanding Why He Does Not Deserve a Second Contract as Superintendent of the Minneapolis Public Schools >>>>> From Objective Data Presentation to Analysis of Graff’s Tenures in Anchorage and Minneapolis

This is the fourth article in my series examining the record of Ed Graff, conveying to readers why he does not deserve a second contract as superintendent of the Minneapolis Public Schools.


In the first three articles of this series I offered my readers strictly objective information from Ed Graff’s record as to credentials;  tenure in several capacities for the Anchorage, Alaska, schools;  and performance in the course of the two years and seven months that Graff has served as superintendent for the Minneapolis Public Schools.  I challenged my readers to consider why I would examine the record provided and recommend strongly against reappointment.
With this fourth article, I begin to analyze the Graff record, breaking from the objective data presentation to explain why he does not deserve a new contract.
………………………………………………………………………………

At the 12 March meeting of the Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) Board of Education, board members will be voting on a new contract that has already been negotiated and drafted by district officials. 

Graff does not deserve a new contract.

Graff came to MPS from the Anchorage, Alaska, public schools, where he had served for many years as an elementary school teacher and administrator in several capacities, including building principal, academic officer, and superintendent.  At the end of Graff’s three-year term (running from autumn 2013-spring 2016) as Anchorage superintendent, the school board for that district voted not to offer Graff another contract.  MPS board members Jenny Arneson and Rebecca Gagnon (the latter no longer on the MPS board, having lost in the November 2018 election) visited Anchorage in early 2016;  they could not determine why the Anchorage board did not renew Graff’s contract but found vague reasons to report favorably on his performance.

In my observations and interactions with Graff upon his arrival, I found numerous warning signs that he would not be an effective leader of the academic program of the Minneapolis Public Schools.  In addition to my regular attendance at board and other meetings of the district, I attended four of the five community meetings that Graff held, finding him evasive as to his educational philosophy and vision for the district:

He told me to just watch what he did to find out about these matters.

I have watched, and I do not like what I have witnessed.

From what can be gleaned from documents pertinent to the Graff program, priorities for MPS focus on social and emotional learning (SEL), a multi-tiered system of support (MTSS), literacy, and equity:

Social and emotional learning is touted most prominently by the organization CASEL (Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning and focuses on five chief goals for the social and emotional development of students and school personnel:  self-awareness, self-management, decision-making, social awareness, and human relationship skills.  The MTSS program seeks to identify student academic and life challenges and to address these with targeted academic assistance, psychological evaluation, and counseling.  Literacy concerns the development of reading skills via the new Benchmark reading curriculum.  Equity follows provisions in the district’s Equity and Diversity and Impact Assessment (EDIA) and another document, the Educational Equity Framework, both of which convey a vow to provide equitable treatment to all students and district personnel.

The striking observation about SEL, literacy, and equity is that they should be assumed.  We should be able to assume that students are guided by caring adults in their social and emotional development.  Reading is clearly one of two skills, along with math, that is determinative of academic success.  In the year 2019, equity in any moral and rational universe should be an intrinsic value.  These three aspects of the Graff program certainly should be present and observed throughout the district, but these are so clearly to be expected that they should not be offered as major planks in a program for transformation of the magnitude needed at the Minneapolis Public Schools.

The MTSS program would be promising but has not been implemented, and there has been no thorough preparation of teachers and administrators across the district to identify and provide the targeted assistance to students fundamental to the promulgated program.  Nor do officials in many quarters of the Davis Center (MPS central offices) with whom I have talked have any faith that the level of training for implementing the program can be provided in the near future.

Student performance during the Graff years has been flat or, for key demographic student categories, declining.  This is stunningly consistent with the performance of Anchorage district students during the Graff years as superintendent in that location.  During Graff’s three years as superintendent in Anchorage, over 70 percent of African American, Latino/Latina, and Native Alaskan/American Indian students did not meet standards of proficiency in both reading and mathematics.  In the Minneapolis Public Schools, mathematics proficiency rates for African American and American Indian students have declined from 19 percent for the academic year ending in 2016 to 17 percent in the academic year ending in 2018 and have declined also (to under 30%) for Latino/Latina students and for those on free/reduced price lunch.  Similarly, despite a two percentage point rise in overall reading proficiency, 25 percent or fewer MPS African American, Latino/Latina, and American Indian students are proficient in reading as of spring 2018.

Other than the four key goals (SEL, MTSS, literacy, and equity), the other place to consider for indication of the Graff program is in the MPS Comprehensive District Design, a draft for which indicates a program for the provision of a well-rounded education to all students, to be phased in until full implementation is achieved by academic year 2021-2022.  My examination of this program, though, gives me little hope that any new strategic plan to be forged from the Design and the four goals is likely to be any more successful than the ill-fated Acceleration 2020 Strategic Plan that is now effectively moribund.

Ed Graff has been very successful in paring the Davis Center bureaucracy from approximately 650 to 450 staff members and in making astute personnel evaluations and hires in the areas of finance, information technology, operations, and human resources.  But the MPS academic division is extraordinarily weak.  Nothing in the Graff record at Anchorage or Minneapolis indicates that he can be the leader with a vision and attainable goals for student academic achievement that is the fundamental responsibility for the locally centralized school district.

Upon his urging, I have observed closely what Ed Graff has done as MPS superintendent since July 2016:

That observation, yielding the presentation given above, argues powerfully against the new contract on which board members will vote at the Tuesday, 12 March meeting.

Mar 4, 2019

Article #3 in a Series >>>>> An Examination of the Ed Graff Record in Understanding Why He Does Not Deserve a Second Contract as Superintendent of the Minneapolis Public Schools >>>>> The Graff Program Focused on Social and Emotional Learning; Multi-Tiered System of Support; Literacy; and Equity

This is the third article in my series examining the record of Ed Graff, conveying to readers why he does not deserve a second contract as superintendent of the Minneapolis Public Schools.


Other than that opening subjective statement, though, I am in these first articles in the series offering my readers strictly objective information from Ed Graff’s record as to credentials;  tenure in several capacities for the Anchorage, Alaska, schools;  and performance in the course of the two years and seven months that Graff has served as superintendent for the Minneapolis Public Schools.
I challenge my readers to consider why I would examine the record provided and recommend strongly against reappointment.  I surmise that for many readers this exercise may prove difficult, inasmuch as to those who do not understand the nature of credentials acquisition for professional positioning in locally centralized school systems, there may well be items in the Graff record that look appealing but are in fact distinct negatives.  Readers who have truly sought to go deeply with me over the course of the nearly 1,000 articles on this blog will most likely draw the same conclusions as have I.
Whichever sort of reader you are, please now continue your examination of the facts pertinent to the record of Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) Superintendent Ed Graff;  I now present the essence of the Graff program focused on Social and Emotional Learning (SEL);  Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS);  Literacy;  and Equity.
Please now read the descriptions of these planks of the Graff program, as follows:
Graff has served as MPS superintendent for two years and seven months.  He inherited Strategic Plan Acceleration 2020  but is now working with his staff on a new strategic plan.  He and Chief of Staff Suzanne Kelly are also working on a Minneapolis Public Schools Comprehensive District Design, to be implemented in phases that by 2022 features the goal of delivering a well-rounded education to all students, for whom multiple pathways to success will be provided. 
In the meantime, the Graff program has focused on four goals:  Social and Emotional Learning (SEL);  Multi-Tiered System Support (MTSS);  Literacy;  and Equity. 
Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) focuses on respect for oneself and others as necessary preparation for receiving academic instruction.  Graff won an award from the Collaborative for Academic, Social, Emotional Learning (CASEL).  The CASEL approach emphasizes five areas for personal and social development:  self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, responsible decision-making, and relationship skills.


Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) is projected to give individual students the array of services, including counseling and targeted academic intervention, that they need to be successful.  The program has only gained very partial implementation.


Literacy concerns the development of reading skills with the Benchmark curriculum that was adopted soon after Graff became superintendent in Minneapolis. 


Equity as perceived in the Graff administration follows the Equity and Diversity Impact Statement (EDIA) and the Educational Equity Framework.