Dec 20, 2023

Article #3 >>>>> >Journal of the K-12 Revolution: Essays and Research from Minneapolis, Minnesota<, Volume X, No. 5, November 2023

Article #3     

The Japanese Period of Rule, 1895-1945

 

Qing rulers were loath to give up the Liaodong Peninsula of Manchuria, and they were humiliated by the indemnity provisions of the treaty, but they relinquished Taiwan with a notable lack of protest.

 

The Taiwanese themselves, though, put up a stiff resistance against the occupation of their island by the latest outside claimant.  On 25 May 1895 (38 days after the signing of the Treaty of Shimonoseki) one Tang Jingsong declared himself President of the new Republic.of Taiwan.  Tang, whose base was in northern Taiwan around Taibei, gave recognition as vice president to a notable figure from the Taizhong area by the name of Qiu Fengjia.  And Lin Yongfu, leader of a group in the Tainan area known as the Black Flag Militia, was declared head of the military forces of the fledging republic.  But Japanese forces soon landed near Jilong, then more came ashore at Lugang (on the west coast), and by 7 June Japanese troops occupied Taibei.  By this time Tang Jingsong had already escaped aboard a British ship bound for Xiamen, and within a few days Qiu Fengjia followed suit.  Lin Yongfu, meanwhile, put up quite a fight, keeping the Japanese well occupied in an effort to secure the southern part of the island until 19 October 1895, at which time Lin did make his own exit.  This ended the effort to establish a new and independent government headed by Taiwanese people, but anti-Japanese resistance continued for many years.  By 1903, 20,000 Taiwanese and 5,300 Japanese people had lost their lives in the violent conflict that accompanied Japanese seizure of the island.  Not until 1902 did violent protest across Taiwan substantially subside;  scattered protest would continue throughout the Japanese tenure of control on Taiwan, but for the most part the colonial overlords were able at this point to proceed with their policy initiatives without fear of serious sustained violence.

 

Those initiatives revealed the Japanese to be ruthless, predictable, enormously skillful rulers who adeptly extracted the agricultural, forest, and mineral wealth of Taiwan while introducing significant elements of modernity to much of the Taiwanese populace.  Under the vigorous Governor General Kodama Gentaro and his civil administrator Goto Shimpei, extensive geological, demographic, and cultivated land surveys went forward.  The colonial regime simplified the land tenure system, doubled cultivated land subject to taxation, and expanded the value of taxes collected on agricultural production four-fold.  Other highly effective resource extraction devices were put in place, including government monopolies on opium, salt, camphor, and tobacco;  savings accounts located conveniently at postal centers;  and excise taxes on various goods consumed out of addiction, habit, or luxury.

 

The Japanese brought a level of efficiency and completeness of control to the governance of Taiwan that the island’s people had never before witnessed.  The presence of the colonial administration was exerted at the highest level in provinces (shu) centered on the key cities of Taibei, Jilong, Taizhong, Tainan, and Gaoxiong.  And that control reached right down through other sizable municipalities (shi), counties (gun), townships (gai), and subtownships (ku), all the way into the island’s villages (sho). Eighty-seven branch Agricultural Associations connected administratively to the Central Agricultural Research Institute in Taibei served efficiently to disseminate the latest agricultural initiatives, even as they served as additional mechanisms of imperial control.  The two functions could be seen in finely tuned coalescence when the imperial administration decided in the 5 May 1926 Japanese Rice and Grain Conference to speed dissemination of the ponlai rice strain, preferable to the Japanese by comparison to the traditional Taiwanese zailai strain.  From just 400 hectares in 1922, cultivated land given to ponlai increased to 139,000 hectares by 1928 and to 400,000 hectares in 1944.[i]  The Japanese superintended the world’s first Green Revolution through advancing new high-yielding strains of rice and sugar, and by erecting an island-wide network of irrigation systems, many of them benefiting from highly sophisticated engineering feats represented quintessentially by the Taoyuan (completed in 1928) and the Jianan (completed in 1932) dam and reservoirs.

 

The great bulk of the Taiwanese population, its farmers, were subject to a high level of economic exploitation under the imperialist regime, but health and sanitation improved greatly and, accordingly, the incidence of dread diseases such as cholera, small pox, and bubonic plague radically diminished.  The Japanese also encouraged a minimal literacy for the general population and in 1943 made school attendance through the third grade mandatory.  In 1904 only 3.8% of the Taiwanese populace attended any kind of school.  By 1917 that figure had risen to 13.1% and continued to grow steadily until in 1943 the percentage of school-age children in attendance for academic instruction had increased to 71.3%.

 

The Taiwanese elite enjoyed more benefits from the Japanese administration, tapped as they were for key civil service posts and able increasingly as the Japanese tenure moved toward the 1930s to place their children in middle schools, Taiwan Imperial University in Taibei, and in a number of universities in Japan.   Travel and study in Japan came much into vogue for the Taiwanese elite.  By 1922, 2,400 Taiwanese students were matriculating at universities in Japan, and by 1942 that figure had increased about 150% to 7,000.  And by 1945, the year that the Japanese had to make their exit from Taiwan, 30,000 Taiwanese were living in Japan.

 

The years 1915-1930 featured a relative relaxation of authoritarian control by the imperialist regime on Taiwan.  In this atmosphere, Taiwan’s educated populace exerted vigorous efforts to gain greater political autonomy.  These efforts mostly focused upon gaining greater participation within the context of continuing control by the Japanese imperial administration.  In 1923, members of the restive and politically aware middle class formed the League for the Establishment of a Taiwanese Parliament (1923).  When their remonstrations gained little result, many members of this organization became more radical, moving toward a stance of demand for independence.  This engendered a breakaway organization, the Taiwanese Federation for Local Autonomy, formed by those who continued to hold a moderate position.  But members of this organization themselves eventually moved leftward, precipitating the formation of the conservative Taiwanese Federation for Local Autonomy by those who felt that as a practical matter, and in line with the loyalty that many members of the Taiwanese elite had developed toward the Japanese regime, autonomy within the Japanese Empire was the better way to go.

 

During the same years when this lively political discussion ensued, Taiwan’s writers engaged in vigorous debates of their own.  Writers stepped forward to argue for a literature that used modern expressions and explored current themes focused on issues of genuine interest to the Taiwanese population.  This sort of appeal was similar to the baihua (ordinary speech) movement in China and surfaced during the “New versus Old Debate” (xinjiu wenhua lunzhan) of 1924-1926.  In 1931-1932 came the Nativist Literary Debate” (xiangtu wenxue lunzhan) in which several prominent writers attempted to advance the Minnan dialect as the means for literary expression.  But in the course of the 1930s it became clear that the main language for literary work would in fact be Japanese.  Most writers by this time had been educated primarily in the Japanese language and used it, even when voicing anti-imperialist sentiment, exploring themes pertinent to the lives as lived by people on Taiwan, and advancing issues of interest to the Taiwanese populace in publications such as the Taiwanese People’s Newspaper (Taiwan minbao).

 

As Japanese armies spread down the coast of China from 1937 forward;  then occupied Canton (1938), Hainan (1939), Luzon (1942), and through Southeast Asia to the Burma-India border, a more thoroughly militarized style of governance had great impact on Taiwan.  Taiwan became a major industrial center for processing bauxite, iron ore, crude oil, and rubber from Malaya and Indonesia.  Harbors in Jilong and Gaoxiong were improved and other seaports identified for receiving and shipping critical wartime goods.  Transportation networks became more elaborate, mines and industries received technological upgrades, massive new hydroelectric installations were built, and ever more sophisticated financial institutions were created for investment in all of this activity in Taiwan, with the Japanese zaibatsu taking a key role.  The Japanese took firm control of the Taiwan Strait in 1940, and Governor General Hasegawa Kiyoshi became a point man in establishing the Greater East Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere (Tai Toa Kyoeiken).  This Japanese imperialist thrust came with energetic propaganda efforts through the Imperialization Movement (kominka) on Taiwan that sought to give the Taiwanese people a vision of greatness as residents within Greater Japan.  By 1945, 80,433 Taiwanese servicemen had contributed to the Japanese war effort, as had 126,750 civil employees.

 

The enormously formative period of modern Taiwanese history under Japanese authority came to an end in September 1945 with the Japanese concession of defeat in World War II.  By October, yet another outside governing authority claimed power on Taiwan.  This was the Nationalist regime of the Guomindang, which was poised to experience defeat by the Chinese Communists in the course of the 1945-1949 Chinese Civil War. 

Article #4 >>>>> >Journal of the K-12 Revolution: Essays and Research from Minneapolis, Minnesota<, Volume X, No. 5, November 2023

 

Article #4     

The Guomindang Period of Control, 1945-2000

 

By the middle and latter years of the 1940s decade, the Taiwanese people held varying views on the Japanese exit from governmental authority.  Some had internalized a degree of loyalty to the Japanese that made the Japanese ouster a matter of regret.  Others held on to hopes for some form of autonomous Taiwanese governing entity.  Still others took a wait and see attitude as to what rulers of similar Chinese ethnicity might have in mind for the people of the island.  What soon became clear was that the demoralized and corrupt representatives of the Guomindang who arrived on Taiwan during the years 1945-1949 governed in an authoritarian mode reminiscent of the recently departed Japanese, but without the discipline, skill, and predictability that the Taiwanese people had come to expect during the Japanese period of control.

 

The arrogance and corruption that characterized the governmental authority represented by Chen Yi and his administration in the inauguration of the fifth occupation of Taiwan by an outside ruling power engendered a great deal of anti-Guomindang activity across the island that exploded with great furor in the February 28th Incident (Er er ba shijian).  This uprising began with a seemingly unremarkable encounter between an old woman selling black market cigarettes and police who handled her roughly in the effort to get her to move on.  But this encounter drew angry crowds of people who pelted the police with rocks, sending others to get weapons that they brandished in a rush on police headquarters and on many streets of the city.  News of the incident spread throughout the island and spawned many weeks of protest, generally led by some of the brightest, best educated, most respected figures on Taiwan.  Before the government at last brought the larger movement inspired by the February 28th Incident to a close, somewhere between 10,000 and 20,000 Taiwanese had lost their lives.

 

The Guomindang never entirely recovered from this false start, which lay etched in the memories of people of all walks of life for many decades leading up to the 1980s.  But the Guomindang did successfully cut a deal with the Taiwanese people that bought their cooperation with a governing regime that managed to right itself dramatically from its missteps in the events around the Chinese Civil War and the first years of its tenure of power on Taiwan.  Listening carefully to advisers from the United States that arrived in the wake of President Harry Truman’s order for United States ships to occupy the Taiwan Strait, and building on the infrastructure and certain policies set in motion during the Japanese era of control, the Guomindang authored a series of policy initiatives that transformed the economy of Taiwan.  A brilliant land reform program begun in stages during 1949-1953 laid the groundwork for a land to the tiller agrarian society that ended centuries of landlord domination of the countryside.  An import substitution policy dominated government economic activity during 1953-1961 and induced many private businesses to produce aggressively for the home market.  In 1962 came the shift to an  export orientation for Taiwan and its fellow “little dragons” (including also Singapore, Hong Kong, and South Korea) that effectively joined them to the “big dragon” of Japan in bringing economic clout to East Asia.

 

The Arab-Israeli conflict of 1973 brought the oil embargo disruptions of 1973-1974 that affected Taiwan along with all industrialized and industrializing economies of the world.  But decision-makers at the Guomindang’s Central Bank of China adjusted interest rates and monetary flow so as to ameliorate the inflationary impact on Taiwan’s populace, and Taiwan’s economy continued to grow rapidly during the 1970s and 1980s, weathering along the way a second oil crisis in 1979.[i]  Just as the regime had greatly abetted its export-led strategy with the establishment of two Export Processing Zones (EPZs) in the Gaoxiong area and one near Taizhong in the late 1960s, so it adroitly propelled a shift to information and high technology goods with the establishment of the Xinzhu Science and Technology Center during the 1970s..[ii]  On the strength of apt economic moves that met the prevailing international and domestic conditions at given times, the Guomindang administration was able to keep the deal that it had cut with the Taiwanese people and hold opponents of the regime at bay well into the 1980s.

 

International political realignments in the meantime contributed to an increasingly unsettled political situation in Taiwan.  In 1971 the United Nations dropped its recognition of Chiang Kai-shek’s Republic of China in favor of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that was firmly ensconced as the actually governing force in China.  In 1972 the government of Japan gave formal diplomatic recognition to the PRC and the United States administration led by President Jimmy Carter did so in 1979.  By that time there was a well-developed movement of political opposition on Taiwan, formed of courageous activists who proved willing to challenge the one-party state.  A significant demonstration of discontent took place in the form of the 1979 Gaoxiong Incident, an event led by Shi Mingde and Lu Xiulian, that inspired anti-government forces throughout the island and gave impetus to the formation of a major political challenger to the Guomindang.  The ability of non-Guomindang candidates to compete effectively for public office had always been greatly circumscribed.  Those who did run against Guomindang candidates were labeled simply dangwai (“outside the party”).  By 1986 some people who had participated as dangwai candidates came together to form the Democratic Progressive Party (minjindang, the DPP), a party that included many of the participants in the Gaoxiong Incident and other key figures, most notably Chen Shuibian.

 

Against this backdrop of growing political opposition, President Chiang Ching-guo considered the future of the polity whose leadership his father Chiang Kai-shek had passed to him upon the latter’s death in 1975.  A person who had come to power as a hard-nosed operative with close ties to the military and security establishments, Chiang Ching-guo nevertheless proved capable of evolving an agreeable public persona with the vision to see that a new day was dawning across Taiwan’s political landscape.  In 1987 he lifted martial law, recognized the legitimacy of the DPP, and let it be know that his vice-president, a native Taiwanese by the name of Lee Teng-hui, had his blessing to lead the Guomindang party and government when Chiang’s Chingguo’s  failing health should render him incapable.  Lee did in fact assume power in 1988 upon Chiang Chingguo’s death.

 

Lee Teng-hui proved himself to be one of the master political operators of the late 20th century.  He seized upon the opportunity offered him by public demonstrations at Taibei’s Chiang Kai-shek Memorial in March 1990 to move toward major reforms in the two national legislative bodies, making the Legislative Yuan a truly representative body for which candidates could now campaign freely, and setting the National Assembly on a course toward extinction.  This latter body, comprised through most of the years of the “Republic of China” on Taiwan of largely mainlander figures who elected the president, gave way to Taiwan’s first democratic election of the president in 1996.  Lee Teng-hui won this election.  Riding high in popularity and in the course of his 1990s tenure of power having presided over a political miracle every bit as impressive as Taiwan’s  famous economic miracle, Li nevertheless declined to run again for president in 2000.  That election pitted Guomindang candidate Lien Chan against independent candidate James Soong and the Democratic Progressive Party’s Chen Shuibian.[iii]  Chen won that election with a plurality of the votes, thus bringing to an end the Guomindang era of rule.  Chen won reelection in 2004 before becoming embroiled in a corruption scandal that eventually sent him to prison, a situation that provided an opportunity in a now democratic context for the Guomindang to win control of the presidency again via the candidacy of Ma Ying-jeou.

Taiwan is an independent political entity and will be an avowedly independent nation if the Taiwanese people, now free participants in a democratic polity, should decide to make such a formal declaration.  Since the leadership of the People’s Republic of China needs the Taiwan issue as part of its strategy to maintain control on the basis of nationalistic claims (along with economic prowess), a declaration of a new nation to be called, for instance, the Republic of Taiwan, would be pugnacious.  Such a declaration would have the potential of provoking a military confrontation that thus far few Taiwanese have shown a willingness to engender

 



 

[i] Davison, Agricultural Development, pp. 122-123;  Lin Zhongxing, pp. 79-83.

 

[ii] Lin Songlin, in his Jiang jingguo di shidai [the Chiang Ching-kuo era] (Taibei: Fenglin Shidai Ltd, 1993), pp. 23-31, gives a detailed discussion of the Ten Major Projects that symbolized the dynamic economic moves of the administration during the 1970s.  See also Murray A. Rubenstein, “Taiwan’s socioeconomic Modernization, “ in Rubenstein, pp. 373-374, and Davison, Agricultural Development, p. 122 and pp. 126-127.   

 

[iii] Julian Baum, Dan Biers, and Susan Lawrence, “Chen’s Chance,” Far Eastern Economic Reivew, 30 March 2000, pp. 18-20;  Julian Baum and Bruce Gillien, “Crude Tactics, “ Far Eastern Economic Review, 29 June 2000, p. 25;  Davison, History: Independence, p.  114.

Article #5 >>>>> >Journal of the K-12 Revolution: Essays and Research from Minneapolis, Minnesota<, Volume X, No. 5, November 2023

Article #5     

The Political Independence of the Taiwanese People, 2000-Present

 

Given the aggressive and illogical claims of the regime that maintains control in China, the people of Taiwan have thus far been satisfied with de facto independence, continuing to operate under the outdated and always fanciful official appellation, Republic of China.

 

But Taiwan has never been the Republic of China.  That term was brought from China as part of the baggage carried by the Guomindang, the loser of a territory that it aspired to regain.  Until the 1990s, the Guomindang maintained a “provincial” government for Taiwan and even a “provincial” legislature based in Taizhong that was officially separate from the “national” government in Taibei.  Among the reforms of the Lee Teng-hui era was the elimination of the Taizhong governments.[xi]  With Chen Shuibian’s tenure came the adoption of the name “Taiwan” for many central government journals and the abiding assumption that any reference to the “Republic of China” was a convenient fiction.

 

Indeed, Taiwan has never been China, and only briefly in the long scope of history even under the sway of any government that actually exercised control over all of China. And no government has simultaneously controlled Taiwan and all of China for the last 116 years.  Only during the Dutch, Zheng, and Qing periods did Han Chinese people begin immigration into Taiwan in significant numbers.  Until the 17th century, Taiwan was an island on which the stock of people who had conducted themselves freely across the island for about 5,600 years still had the island to themselves.  Taiwan’s populace then endured a succession of periods during which outsiders controlled the island:  the periods of Dutch (1624-1661);  Zheng family (1661-1683);  Qing Dynasty (1683-1895);  Japanese (1895-1945);  and Guomindang (1945-1987) control.  Only as the Dutch, Zheng, and Qing periods ensued did Han Chinese people from Fujian and Guangdong come to the island in significant numbers, eventually overwhelming in sheer size the aboriginal population.  During the Guomindang era, people with ancestral roots across China followed the Guomindang across the Taiwan Stratit.  Thus today the Taiwanese population consists of a small aboriginal population, a sizable minority population of Han Chinese whose ancestral roots lie outside Fujian and Guangdong, and a majority population of Han Chinese people with ancestral ties to Fujian and Guangdong whose forebears have resided on Taiwan for about 400 years.

 

In the momentous year of 2000, the same year that a non-Guomindang political actor was elected to the presidency, an exhibition at the Taibei Fine Arts Museum highlighted the four prime contemporary cultural influences on Taiwan:  aboriginal culture;  traditional Chinese culture;  the cultural legacy of the Japanese period, and the manifestations of Western cultures (especially that of the United States) that have significantly affected Taiwan in contemporary times. These are the Taiwanese people.  These are the influences that have shaped a unique and independent political entity.

 

Taiwan features a thoroughly industrialized and post-industrialized economy with a high per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of $35,100 (#36 in the world).  The People’s Republic of China features a rapidly growing economy but has a low per capita GDP of $7,400 (#127 in the world).[xii]  Taiwan underwent a political transition beginning in 1987 that resulted in full-blown democracy by the late 1990s.  The government of the People’s Republic of China unleashed troops on its people at Tiananmen in 1989 and maintains tight political and military control.[xiii]  Taiwan’s wealth is well-dispersed throughout the island, which has a very natural politico-territorial integrity.  The People’s Republic of China features a dynamic economy, the benefits of which are unevenly dispersed;  it is an empire, rather than a nation proper, that exercises dominance over restive and unwilling peoples, most especially those of Tibet and Xinjiang.  The People’s Republic of China extends its claim to Taiwan on the basis of that imperial thrust, not on the basis of any logic found in history.

 

Empires and nations usually control territory based on original thrusts of martial force.  The leadership of the People’s Republic of China could opt to make such a move on Taiwan in an effort to make the island an addition to the empire of China.  Taiwan, though, is currently an independent political entity with a history mostly separate from the great unfolding of events in China.  Its history has been one of outsider seizures of power from which the people broke free beginning in 1987.  The great bulk of the Taiwanese people recognize the substantial difference between their own polity and that which prevails in China.  They want the independence that remains theirs to maintain and, if they so chose, to formally proclaim.  If the Taiwanese people should ever declare that independence, such a declaration could only be dishonored through force of arms, under the watchful eye of an international community that chooses to side with military might over historical right.

Dec 4, 2023

Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) Board of Education Meeting of Friday, 1 December 2023, to Select New Superintendent Microcosmically Represents All That Is Wrong with Public Education

The Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) Board of Education meeting of Friday, 1 December 2023, to select the new MPS Superintendent microcosmically represents all that Is wrong with public education. 

The background to this demonstration of incompetence and intellectual corruption goes back to autumn 2022 when A. J. Crabill, invited to address that Board as a representative of the Council of Great City Schools, seemingly against expectation of key members, counseled the Board to use a search or law firm only for vetting and handling logistics:  He conveyed his conviction that astute Boards are always in readiness when the need arises to select a new superintendent and should always be cultivating internal candidates.  The previous Board, especially as impelled by the four key members given reference above, ignored Mr. Crabill’s advice and endeavored to put in place a suggested timetable for a very conventional process in selecting the next superintendent. The current Board, most of whom were sworn in officially in January 2023, in large measure followed the signals of the previous Board and charted a very conventional search, except that on 7 March 2023 they voted to extend the contract of Interim Superintendent Rochelle Cox. 

 

With that move the new Board members did provide hope that they could come to understand the historically unprecedented nature of the extraordinary initiatives authored by the Interim Superintendent and executed brilliantly by her staff.

 

With exceptional energy and acuity, Cox and staff superintended the introduction of a new math curriculum (Bridges/Number Corner) that for the first time in recent memory was followed across all grade levels at all schools;  for reading/language arts, a similar uniformity of curriculum was followed in a process that will now move from Benchmark Advance to a new curriculum currently under trial.  Cox and staff also moved with new vigor to ensure faithful implementation of the reading intervention programs Groves, PRESS (“Pathways to Reading Excellence”), and LETRS (“Language Essentials for Teachers of Reading and Spelling”).  Academic and Strategic Initiative staff introduced high dosage tutoring provided by the firms of Carnegie and Axiom, online ACT training and, most importantly, 133 three-person professional teams (one licensed teacher, two trained Education Support Professionals [ESPs]), each team responsible for addressing the academic needs of 75 students lagging below grade level and having not experienced growth in reading or mathematics skills for two successive quarters.  

 

The work that Cox and staff have done to address with elevated intentionality the skill acquisition needs of students languishing chronically far below grade level has never been accomplished by any public school district serving students living at the urban core.

 

Never.

 

Thus, given the unprecedented alacrity with which Cox and staff proceeded to overhaul the Minneapolis Public Schools as a prospective model for urban school districts across the nation, the Board should have put aside conventional processes and asked Rochelle Cox to be the next long-term superintendent of the Minneapolis Public Schools.  They should never have given their decision-making responsibility to an MPS Superintendent Search Task Force that included 14 (of the 17 total) members not elected by the voters in the district.  At any time up until the meeting of Friday, 1 December, the Board could have declined the recommendations of the Task Force and offered the contract to Cox.

 

Alternatively, the Board could have added Cox’s name to the list of finalists, so that the whole Board would have the ability to assess her record compared to the other candidates.  The Task Force was given the responsibility to recommend two or three candidates.  While Cox has never publicly stated that she submitted an application, there is a high degree of probability that she did so and could have had her name forwarded to the Board, along with those of Sonia Stewart and Lisa Sayles-Adams.  The members of the Board---  and the public---  should have had the opportunity to assess the candidacies of Stewart and Sayles-Adams along with the accomplishments of Cox.

 

I have observed superintendents ranging from Richard Green in the 1980s through Ed Graff during 2016-2022.  Because of the terrible training that superintendents receive in education programs, and the academically lightweight nature of their background, there is little surprise that superintendents of the Minneapolis Public Schools and other districts typically fail to address the chronic substandard academic proficiency of students, particularly those facing the challenges of familial poverty at the urban core.  Therefore, the fact that Rochelle Cox is a keen reader of books and has interests across the mathematic, scientific, and liberal arts is highly unusual. 

 

Following from that keen academic interest and her intense love of children and adolescents, Cox in the months stretching from July 2022 through the present (as November turns into November 2023) relentlessly provided to the Board at each monthly business meeting, and each Committee of the Whole, presentations focused on academic programming, closely faithful to the goals of the Strategic Plan (academic achievement, student well-being, effective staff, and school climate and equity).  

 

I sat for years observing Board members and was perpetually stunned that very little discussion of academics took place.  The Board, if members had any perception of what a transformation they were witnessing, should have long ago offered Rochelle Cox the position of long-term Superintendent of the Minneapolis Public Schools. 

 

Instead, the Board on that fateful evening of 1 December 2023 confined themselves to deciding from the candidacies of Sonia Stewart and Lisa Sayles-Adams. 

 

Stewart is the typical mediocrity from superintendent candidate pools, and she had disturbing red flags in her professional history:

 

Stewart has written a book, All Children Are Our Children:  A Pearl at the Heart of the City (CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform), based on her experiences at Pearl-Cohn, which she considers the crown jewel of her accomplishments as an educator.  But Pearl-Cohn guidance counselor Kelly Brown, in an article by Samantha West of the Green Bay Press Gazette, conveyed her view that Stewart and staff at Pearl-Cohn maneuvered to make standardized test scores look better than they were.  A Nashville television report in 2015 revealed that Pearl-Cohn had implemented a policy prohibiting giving students a grade below a 60---  even if all the student did was “wad up the test and throw it back at the teacher.”  A district spokesperson at the time defended Stewart by saying that Metro Nashville Public Schools had implemented a controversial policy two years earlier that no student could get a grade below a 50 and that Stewart had simply misinterpreted that policy.

 

Brown also criticized a policy at Pearl-Cohn that automatically gave an A to any student who took an Advanced Placement exam — even if they slept through it.  She also stated that under pressure from the district’s central office to improve test scores, just before students were to take end-of-course finals for which they had not done well on practice exams, Stewart prevailed upon counselor Brown to transfer students from the classes in which they had been enrolled to the Credit Recovery program. 

 

Current figures from U. S. News and World Report record that only 3% of Pearl-Cohn students are proficient in mathematics, only 12% are proficient in reading, and that though 35% of Pearl-Cohn high school students took the Advanced Placement exam in academic year 2021-2022, not a single student recorded 3 out of 5 points regarded by college and university admissions offices as minimally necessary to gain college credit.  Despite an 86.5% graduation rate, college readiness for graduating seniors at Pearl Cohn is rated as just 18.3 (eighteen and three-tenths) on a scale of 0 to 100.

 

As for Lisa Sayles-Adams, her record is also undistinguished. 

 

Academic results in the Eastern Carver County Schools where Sayles-Adams has been serving as superintendent, are not very impressive, given that this district serves middle class students and only 9.2% (nine and two-tenths percent) of students are on free/reduced price lunch.  The latter district serves just 9,377 students, raising doubt as to whether Sayles-Adams is actually prepared to lead the Minneapolis Public Schools, in which 48% of 29,000 students are on free/reduced price lunch and with that figure rising to 85% of students at many MPS schools. 

 

Despite being a very middle-class district, the mathematics proficiency rate in Eastern Carver County Schools is just 64% for elementary school students, while for reading the figure is 63%;  the comparable figures for middle school students are 42% and 59% and for high school students 56% and 67%.  The graduation rate, at 69.5%, is not impressive for a middle-class district, and the college readiness score of 45.2 (forty-five and two-tenths) on the U. S. News and World Report scale of 0 to 100 is quite mediocre.

 

And yet these were the predictably lackluster candidates of the sort regularly recommended by search firms to school boards.

 

The official vote tally on Friday, 1 December 2023, went 8-1, with Sayles-Adams getting the affirmative votes of Board members Kim Ellison, Faheema Feerayarre, Lori Norvell, Sharon El-Amin, Abdul Abdi, Joyner Emerick, Collin Beachy, and---  despite having spoken in behalf of Stewart in the discussion period---  Adriana Cerrillo;  only Ira Jourdain voted for Stewart.

 

During the discussion period, Board members repeatedly stated that Stewart and Sayles-Adams were both “great” candidates.

 

Given the de facto mediocrity of the candidates, I ask of the Board members a question that I am ever asking of education establishment figures:

 

Are they


1) ignorant (abysmal information bases);  

 

2) in denial (staring straight into the truth but rejecting facts);  

 

or

 

3) outright corrupt?

 

 

This phenomenon of low school board member quality is one of the key vexations of public education. 

 

The mediocrity of superintendent candidates is another;  they share with all public school administrators and teachers a lack of solid academic credentials, possessing at most an undergraduate degree in a solid discipline, with all graduate training in departments, schools, and colleges of education. 

 

Lack of informed public interest is another vexation of the public schools and was witnessed by the low turnout at the 1 December meeting, with just a dozen so onlookers, aside from language interpreters and journalists.  In this case, the low turnout also most likely indicated dissatisfaction with the candidates under consideration:  There was a spooky silence in the room, with no applause whatsoever when Lisa Sayles-Adams was announced as the next long-term Superintendent of the Minneapolis Public Schools.


Given this gloomy outlook for most public school districts, the accomplishments of Rochelle Cox and staff are magnified.  They have articulated a nonpareil academic program and demonstrated highly elevated talent.  Cox’s staff, under the strong assumption that she had applied for the long-term superintendent position, was in mourning after the decision;  many were on the edge of despondency. 

 

The pathbreaking work that this super staff has done for months is now under threat by a Board whose members variously lack intellectual wherewithal, are in a state of denial, or are outright corrupt---   and thus unable to grasp the opportunity to create the model for public education that Cox and staff have articulated and are vigorously in the process of implementing.

 

Ironically, Lisa Sayles-Adams does have a chance to succeed if she embraces the initiatives of Rochelle Cox and her staff.   If she does not do so, she will be the typically failed superintendent that characterizes all public school districts and has plagued the Minneapolis Public Schools specifically from the tenure of Richard Green (1980s) through Ed Graff (2016-2022).

 

What high praise is the circumstance that Cox, despite her crude treatment at the hands of the MPS Board of Education, loves children so much and is so invested in the quality rather than the prestige of the work, that she is likely to stay on to advise Sayles-Adams;  this is true, too, of most of her magnificent staff.

 

The fate of the long-suffering students of the Minneapolis Public Schools, then, now resides in the willingness of Lisa Sayles-Adams to continue the unprecedented work of Interim Superintendent Rochelle Cox and her staff.

 

Nov 26, 2023

An Open Letter to Members of the Minneapolis Public Schools Board of Education, Pertinent to the Inadequacy of the Two Candidates--- Sonia Stewart and Lisa Sayles-Adams--- Recommended by the 17-Member, Mostly Unelected, Superintendent Search Task Force


New Salem Educational Initiative

A Program of New Salem Missionary Baptist Church

Gary Marvin Davison, Director

November 26, 2023

 

 

Directors

Minneapolis Public Schools

Board of Education

1250 West Broadway

Minneapolis  MN  55411

 

 

MPS Board of Education Directors:

 

I trust that this note finds all of you well in the aftermath of a warm and joyful Thanksgiving with loved ones, and that the spirit of gratitude lingers as you anticipate a very blessed holiday season.

 

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

 

Attached to this email are several documents for your reference as we move forward in this week, at the end of which you will, if the schedule holds, on this coming Friday, 1 December, vote on the next Superintendent of the Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS).

You have bungled this search terribly.

One of the documents attached is the communication containing the notes that in autumn 2022 A. J. Crabill sent to the previous iteration of the MPS Board of Education.  Mr. Crabill was invited to address that Board as a representative of the Council of Great City Schools.  Seemingly against expectation of key members of that Board, though, Mr. Crabill counseled members to use a search or a law firm only for vetting and handling logistics:  He conveyed his conviction that astute Boards are always in readiness when the need arises to select a new superintendent and should always be cultivating internal candidates.

The previous Board, especially as impelled by the four key members given reference above, ignored Mr. Crabill’s advice and endeavored to put in place a suggested time table for a very conventional process in selecting the next superintendent.  You, the members of the current Board, in large measure followed the signals of the previous Board and charted a very conventional search, except that on 7 March 2023 you voted to extend the contract of Interim Superintendent Rochelle Cox. 

With that move you provided hope that you would understand the historically unprecedented nature of the extraordinary initiatives authored by the Interim Superintendent and executed brilliantly, especially by Executive Director of Strategic Initiatives Sarah Hunter, Senior Academic Officer Aimee Fearing, Deputy Senior Academic Officer Maria Rollinger, and Senior Finance and Operations Officer Ibrahima Diop;  but also by Executive Director of Engagement and External Relations Tyrize Cox, Executive Director of Equity and School Climate Derek Francis, and Executive Director of Student Support Services Meghan Hickey.  Indeed, Senior Information Technology Officer Justin Hennes,  Interim Senior Human Resources Officer Alicia Miller, the associate superintendents, and the Anti-Bias, Anti-Racist (ABAR) team give appearance as a nonpareil group of highly talented individuals working with extraordinary and seamless alacrity to implement a knowledge-intensive, skill-replete academic program, with abiding reference to MPS Strategic Plan values prioritizing academic achievement, student well-being, effective staff, and school and district climate.

With exceptional energy and acuity, Cox and Fearing superintended the introduction a new math curriculum (Bridges/Number Corner) that for the first time in recent memory was followed across all grade levels at all schools.  And for reading/language arts, a similar uniformity of curriculum was followed in a process that will now move from Benchmark Advance to a new curriculum currently under trial.  Cox and staff also moved with new vigor to ensure faithful implementation of the reading intervention programs Groves, PRESS (“Pathways to Reading Excellence”), and LETRS (“Language Essentials for Teachers of Reading and Spelling”).  Academic and Strategic Initiative staff introduced high dosage tutoring provided by the firms of Carnegie and Axiom, online ACT training and, most importantly, 133 three-person professional teams (one licensed teacher, two trained Education Support Professionals [ESPs]), each team responsible for addressing the academic needs of 75 students lagging below grade level and having not experienced growth in reading or mathematics skills for two successive quarters.  

Remember that I have profound knowledge of the history and philosophy of education, that I have spent 52 years teaching students living at the urban core, that I have for 30 years now directed the New Salem Educational Initiative, and that I currently teach 45 students per week, with a 25-person waiting list of students living mostly in North Minneapolis who either attend or live in the attendance zone of the Minneapolis Public Schools.

Take very seriously, then, this communication that conveys to you that Rochelle Cox has been in the process of leading the Minneapolis Public Schools forward toward a model for urban public school districts across the United States. 

The work that Cox and staff have done to address with elevated intentionality the skill acquisition needs of students languishing chronically far below grade level has never been accomplished by any public school district serving students living at the urban core.

Never.

If you doubt this assertion, please read the Analysis and Philosophy sections of my book, Understanding the Minneapolis Public Schools:  Current Condition, Future Prospect, or schedule a meeting with me so that I may explain to you why you have been making history under the direction of Interim Superintendent Rochelle Cox.

……………………………………………………………………………………………


Thus, you should have eleven months ago put aside conventional processes and asked Rochelle Cox to be the next long-term superintendent of the Minneapolis Public Schools.  You should never have given your decision-making responsibility to a task-force that included 14 (of the 17 total) members not elected by the voters in the district. 

You could still take the initiative to decline the recommendations of the task force and offer the contract to Cox;  alternatively, you could make other moves that would alter the track you are now following:

You could add Cox’s name to the list of finalists, so that the whole Board would have the ability to assess her record compared to the other candidates.

I find odd the circumstance that the task force did not recommend three candidates rather than just two: 

While Cox has never publicly stated that she submitted an application, there is a high degree of probability that she did so and could have had her name forwarded to the Board, along with those of Sonia Stewart and Lisa Sayles-Adams.  You members of the Board---  and the public---  should have the opportunity to assess the candidacies of Stewart and Sayles-Adams along with the accomplishments of Cox.

………………………………………………………………………………………………...


As you ponder these recommendations, please read the documents that I have attached to this email. 

I am also going to embed in this email (see below) a mostly objective assessment of the candidacies of Sonia Stewart and Lisa Sayles-Adams.  This combines much information from the presentations on the MPS Board of Education website with objective information from my own investigations, especially including data on the demographics and academic progress for the Hamilton County Schools, where Stewart has served as Deputy Superintendent;  and the Eastern Carver County Schools, where Sayles-Adams has most recently served as Superintendent.

Be attentive, though, in the information provided for Stewart that a controversy arose over her claims of academic progress at Pearl-Cohn High School, in view of policies of her initiation that seemed to make failing courses impossible and rewarded students excessively, giving any student an “A” who merely took an Advanced Placement (AP) exam. 

Please read the article (see link directly below) by Samantha West (“Meet Sonia Stewart, One of Two Finalists for the Green Bay Area Public School District,” Green Bay Press Gazette, May 12, 2023), pertinent to the questions that have been raised about Sonia Stewart’s policies while at Pearl-Cohn High School.

https://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/story/news/education/2020/02/14/sonia-stewart-candidate-green-bay-schools-superintendent-touts-focus-school-culture/4649734002/

Stewart has written a book, All Our Children Are Our Children:  A Pearl at the Heart of the City that is inspiring at many junctures (I ordered and read this book on Saturday, 25 November) but makes highly exaggerated claims for the academic achievements of students at Pearl-Cohn High School, given that U. S. News and World Report data indicates that only 3% of students at Pearl-Cohn are proficient in math, only 12% in reading, that 35% of students at the high school take at least one Advanced Placement (AP) course but that not one---  not one---  passed (score of at least 3 out of 5) in the year ending in 2022 covered by the U. S. News and World Report presentation, and that college readiness for Pearl-Cohn seniors is only 8.7 (eight and seven-tenths) on a scale of 0 to 100.

As to the record of students in the Eastern Carver County Schools where Sayles-Adams has been serving as superintendent, the data observed is not very impressive, given that this district serves middle class students and only 9.2% (nine and two-tenths percent) of students are on free/reduced price lunch.  Also, the word I have from my sources in the St. Paul Public Schools (SPPS) is that administrators regarded Sayles-Adams as not being ready to take a head superintendent role when she assumed the position in Eastern Carver County Schools.  The latter district serves just 9,377 students, casting doubt as to whether this stronger of the two candidates recommended by the task force is actually prepared to lead the Minneapolis Public Schools, with 48% of 29,000 students on free/reduced price lunch;  at many MPS schools the figure for those receiving free/reduced price lunch is at 85% or more).

Consider my comments and information provided herein very seriously, and read carefully the attached documents.

I will be attending the events for the upcoming week and will be highly available for any discussion or questions.

Do go ahead and consider the information below.


With my very best wishes--- 

Gary

 

Gary Marvin Davison, Ph.D.

Director, New Salem Educational Initiative

2507 Bryant Ave North

Minneapolis    MN     55411

http://www.newsalemeducation.blogspot.com

 

Author, 

Understanding the Minneapolis Public Schools:  Current Gary Condition, Future Prospect (New Salem Educational Initiative, second edition, 2023)

Foundations of an Excellent Liberal Arts Education (New Salem Educational Initiative, 2022)

A Concise History of African America (Seaburn, 2004)

The State of African Americans in Minnesota 2004 (Minneapolis Urban League, 2004)

The State of African Americans in Minnesota 2008 (Minneapolis Urban League, 2008) 

A Short History of Taiwan:  The Case for Independence (Praeger, 2003)

Tales from the Taiwanese (Libraries Unlimited, 2004)

Culture and Customs of Taiwan ([with Barbara E. Reed] Greenwood,  1998)

 

Sonia Stewart

 

Deputy Superintendent

Hamilton County Public Schools (HCPS)

45,176 students

 

As Deputy Superintendent of the Hamilton County Public Schools, Sonia Stewart has responsibility for the departments of Teaching and Learning, School Leadership, Opportunity and Access, and Social Emotional and Academic Development.  Her initial position at HCPS was Community Superintendent for the MidTown Learning Community.

 

Prior to her three and one-half years at HCPS, Stewart spent 13 years in the Nashville Public Schools, where she became Executive Officer of Organizational Development after serving as Math Teacher and Head Girls Basketball Coach, Freshman Academy Administrator at Glencliff High School, and then an eventful tenure as Executive Principal at Pearl-Cohn High School.  This latter position created a high profile media story of success but has brought negative reflections from some of her HCPS colleagues who say that testing policies at Pearl Conn inflated test scores and prohibited giving students failing grades. 

 

With regard to questionable policies that Stewart may have utilized, former Pearl Cohn guidance counselor Kelly Brown conveys her view that success at Pearl-Cohn maneuvered to make standardized test scores look better than they were.  A Nashville television report in 2015 revealed that Pearl-Cohn had implemented a policy prohibiting giving students a grade below a 60---  even if all the student did was “wad up the test and throw it back at the teacher.  A district spokesperson at the time defended Stewart by saying that Metro Nashville Public Schools had implemented a controversial policy two years earlier that no student could get a grade below a 50 and that Stewart had simply misinterpreted that policy.

 

Brown also criticized a policy at Pearl-Cohn that automatically gave an A to any student who took an Advanced Placement exam — even if they slept through it.  She also claimed that under pressure from the district’s central office to improve test scores, just before students were to take end-of-course exams for which they had not done well on practice exams, Stewart pressured counselor Brown to transfer students from their classes. The district said in a statement that such an action was in violation of district policy that may not have been clearly communicated to principals, and Stewart vigorously denied the accusations.

 

Before those 13 years in the Nashville Community Public Schools, Stewart taught math in Los Angeles, California and served as the Founder and Executive Director of The Oaks Community Development Corporation in Chicago, building a network of parents, community leaders, and partner organizations for bringing educational reform to a neighborhood at the urban core.

 

Stewart has written a book, All Children Are Our Children:  A Pearl at the Heart of the City (CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform), based on her experiences at Pearl-Cohn.

 

Stewart’s academic credentials are as follows  >>>>>

 

Ed, D., Education, Leadership, and Policy

Vanderbilt University (Nashville, Tennessee)

 

M. Ed.

Trevecca Nazarene University (Nashville TN) 

 

B.S., Mathematics

Biola University (La Mirada CA). 

 

U.S. News and World Report data on public school districts indicates the following for Hamilton county Schools >>>>>

 

Hamilton County Schools

 

79 schools;  22 high schools

Student enrollment 45,176

 

White                                47.6%

African American            25.6%

Hispanic                            17.9%

2 or more ethnicities       6.9%

Asian/                                 1.8%

Pacific Islander

American Indian/             0.0%

Alaska Native

Native Hawaiian/             0.0%

Other Pacific Islander   

 Free/Reduced Price Lunch     46.7%

English Language Learners      6.0%

 

I am working on obtaining information on percentage of students who receive Free/Reduce Price Lunch;  the N/A given in the typically copious U.S. News and World Report data is highly unusual. 

 

Academic Proficiency

 

                         Math             Reading

 

Elementary                39%                 35%

Middle School           26%                 26%

High School               21%                 42%

 

College Readiness                         18.3      (Rated on scale of 0-100) 

Graduation Rate                            86.5%

 

 

 

Lisa Sayles-Adams              

 

Superintendent

Eastern Carver County Schools

9,379 students

 

Lisa Sayles-Adams began her career in education at the Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS)  from 1996 to 2004 as a teacher and eventually served as principal at an MPS contract alternative school in the organization The City, Inc. 

 

Sayles-Adams then worked from 2004 until 2012 in the 52,000-student district of Clayton County Schools in Georgia, serving as high school principal and principal for two elementary schools.

 

Next, Sayles-Adams moved to the St. Paul Public Schools in 2012, holding positions as middle school and elementary school principal before serving for five years as an assistant superintendent.  Then, in 2020, she moved into the same position in the Eastern Carver County Schools;  she was selected as superintendent for the 2021-2022 academic year. 

 

Sayle-Adams's academic credentials are as follows  >>>>>

 

 

Ed, D., Educational Leadership (2022)

Minnesota State University/Mankato

 

M.A., Curriculum and Instruction (2002)

University of Minnesota/Twin Cities 

 

B.A. Political Science        (1992)

University of Minnesota/Twin Cities

 

U.S. News and World Report data on public school districts indicates the following for Eastern Carver County Schools         >>>>>

 

 

Eastern Carver County Schools

21 schools;  6 high schools

Student enrollment 9,379

 

White                                74.6%

Hispanic                            10.4%

African American              5.4%

Two or                                5.2%

more ethnicities

Asian/                                 3.9%

Pacific Islander

American Indian/           0.3%

Alaska Native

Native Hawaiian/           0.1%

Other Pacific Islander

 

………………………………………………….

 

Free/                                 9.2%

Reduced Price Lunch     

English                              5.6%

Language Learners

 

Academic Proficiency

 

Math             Reading

 

Elementary                64%                 63%

Middle School          42%                 59%

High School               56%                 67%

 

Graduation Rate                69.5%

 

College Readiness             45.2   (scale of 0-100)